Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @03:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the sauce-for-the-goose dept.

Police who raided a marijuana store, destroying security cameras and the DVR, harassing the store's customers, consuming edible marijuana products, and playing darts, were caught on camera. The cops claim that said recording is illegal because the cops had an expectation of privacy after destroying all of the security cameras.

I wish I could make up this stuff.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @08:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @08:35PM (#220380)

    A man was shot to death by police a couple blocks from here a couple weeks ago and people have already largely forgotten about it. No protests and very little press.

    So why aren't you protesting? Why aren't you pushing it on the media? You're just as guilty as the people you're chastising, hypocrite.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @09:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @09:14PM (#220401)

    Tu quoque. Why aren't you doing so too? In fact, how do you know he's not? One person can only do so much, and few people are as charismatic as MLK.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @10:50PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @10:50PM (#220456)

      Tu quoque.

      Close, but I never stated or implied that the point wasn't valid or should be ignored based on his hypocrisy, which is what makes it a fallacy ('you're not also doing it, so your point is invalid'). There's nothing fallicious about simply pointing out hypocrisy.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @12:06AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @12:06AM (#220492)

        Then it's not close; my implication that it was an example of tu quoque was simply incorrect. But it is hard to tell sometimes, as hypocrisy is often used as a way to dismiss someone's arguments in and of itself.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @11:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @11:07PM (#220465)

    Why would I be protesting? I'm not protesting the other ones. The protests are done in bad faith based upon the assumption that the police are wrong. By the time the facts of the case are known, the protests overshadow the facts and the actions of the parties involved receive an inaccurate re-appraisal in the context of the protesting.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @06:41PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @06:41PM (#220809)

      The protests are done in bad faith based upon the assumption that the police are wrong.

      Murder is always wrong. Police are not judges nor executioners, if they kill anyone they are automatically in the wrong. This is not the Judge Dredd universe, the job of police is to bring in suspected criminals so they can go to court, not act as judge, jury, and executioner.