Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday August 10 2015, @09:45PM   Printer-friendly

Microsoft's first cumulative update for Windows 10 - KB3081424 - is causing havoc for some users. How do I know this? Because I spent a good part of my Sunday morning dealing with it, that's how.

The problem, in a nutshell, is that the update puts affected systems into an endless crash loop. The update tries to install, gets to a certain point, fails, and then displays the unhelpful "We couldn't complete the updates, undoing the changes."

If it stopped there things wouldn't be too bad, but because Microsoft now forces updates onto Windows 10 users, the OS kept trying - and failing - to install the update, which in turn placed the system into a periodic crash/reboot loop that put quite a dent in my productivity.

To make matters worse, the tool that Microsoft released to hide or block toxic Windows 10 updates (as reported by my ZDNet colleague Ed Bott) didn't allow me to prevent this update from attempting to install. So I was forced to either abandon the machine until a fix was made available or try to fix it myself.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-cumulative-update-causes-reboot-loop-havoc-for-some-users/


Original Submission

Submitted from IRC.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Tuesday August 11 2015, @08:29AM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Tuesday August 11 2015, @08:29AM (#221170) Homepage
    Good on you. Mint isn't for me, but if there are comfortable and convenient distros for people not like me, then that's good for linux generally (similarly, mopeds on the roads are good for harley-riding hells angels, as the more two-wheelers there are the better it is for all of them).

    I had a funny "compatibility" issue with an old notebook I just bought. In Windows (no idea which, I wouldn't know one from any other) I could do only panel (lo-res), only hdmi (a few different resolutions, including quite hi-res), or cloned displays (pinned to the panel's resolution). One slightly botched linux install later (I had intended to leave the Windows as dual bootable, /just in case/, but failed), using xrandr I can have the panel and the hdmi simultaniously and independently running together - and the hdmi has about 20 different resolutions available to it. And this is on a laptop which allegedly has notoriously very poor graphics support under linux (a GMA Intel chip with an IMG graphics processor on it. I bought it because it was cheap, and I was a bit "tired"). So "very poor" is apparently almost better than what MS Windows provides. I say almost, as the hardware scaling of video overlays doesn't (yet) work (because IMG are incompetent tossers, and I knew this is a demonstrable fact already because I've been one of their clients), which means that I need to set the HDMI screen to the closest resolution, and let the telly do the hardware scaling (which it does perfectly well).
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3