Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday August 11 2015, @03:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the as-we-have-said-for-years dept.

Brent Scott has a piece on Aeon about the transformation of the traditional "hacker ethic" as described by Steven Levy and Pekka Himanen into a means of enterprise modeling "doublethink".

We are currently witnessing the gentrification of hacker culture. The countercultural trickster has been pressed into the service of the preppy tech entrepreneur class. It began innocently, no doubt. The association of the hacker ethic with startups might have started with an authentic counter-cultural impulse on the part of outsider nerds tinkering away on websites. But, like all gentrification, the influx into the scene of successive waves of ever less disaffected individuals results in a growing emphasis on the unthreatening elements of hacking over the subversive ones.

Scott goes on to suggest that the hacker ethic has become a "hollowed out" form of "solutionism" as suggested by Evengy Morozov, meaning that "...the tech-industry vision of the world as a series of problems waiting for (profitable) solutions."

This process of gentrification becomes a war over language. If enough newcomers with media clout use the hollowed-out version of the term, its edge grows dull. You end up with a mere affectation, failing to challenge otherwise conventional aspirations. And before you know it, an earnest Stanford grad is handing me a business card that says, without irony: 'Founder. Investor. Hacker.'

The piece ends with Scott calling for a reclaiming of the hacker ethic

I'm going to stake a claim on the word though, and state that the true hacker spirit does not reside at Google, guided by profit targets. The hacker impulse should not just be about redesigning products, or creating 'solutions'. A hack stripped of anti-conventional intent is not a hack at all. It's just a piece of business innovation.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by m2o2r2g2 on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:20AM

    by m2o2r2g2 (3673) on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:20AM (#221124)

    News just in... meanings of words can change.

    If we have a concept that is no longer represented by a word, then trying to "take back the word" will be a losing battle.

    Easiest solution: find a new word, or use more specific sub classifications (like black hat and white hat do for indicating testing with or without inside knowledge)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:25AM (#221126)

    The time has come to take back the word "loser" and show the world that everybody is worth something even if they have no job and have no income and do work on unpaid projects for the love of learning. Losers unite!

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:55AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 11 2015, @06:55AM (#221140) Journal

    News just in... meanings of words can change.

    If we have a concept that is no longer represented by a word, then trying to "take back the word" will be a losing battle.

    Easiest solution: find a new word, or use more specific sub classifications (like black hat and white hat do for indicating testing with or without inside knowledge)

    Did "ethos" change its meaning? Because TFA article is not as much about the meaning of "hacker", as about the "hacker ethos being hacked".

    The countercultural trickster has been pressed into the service of the preppy tech entrepreneur class.

    So, Ok, if you want to make an argument about TFA message and you stumble and fall onto your nose on the "hacker" word, I suggest you to replace it with "trickster" ("countercultural trickster" if you like it better).
    Then you should be able to decipher the substance in TFA* and make your argument.

    ---
    * for a 3000+ words TFA, there's a homoeopathic amount of substance anyway. I can't blame you for not detecting it.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday August 11 2015, @08:16AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Tuesday August 11 2015, @08:16AM (#221164)

    News just in... meanings of words can change.

    If the meanings of words can change, then you can also attempt to educate people about why they shouldn't use a certain word in a certain way. They can change in positive ways too.

    News just in: You don't have to mindlessly accept people using a word in a way that you don't like. You can, in fact, criticize the use.