Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday August 12 2015, @01:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the but-look-what-fdr-did-with-polio dept.
An Anonymous Coward writes:

The New York Times reports some good news from the health front: it's been a year since anybody was diagnosed with polio in Africa.

The goal had seemed tantalizingly close in recent years, but polio always managed to roar back, particularly in Nigeria. Then officials embraced a vigorous new approach to vaccination and surveillance in that country, hiring thousands of community "mobilizers" to track down the unvaccinated, opening operations centers nationwide to track progress and seeking out support from clerics and tribal chiefs.

The result has been remarkable.

The last African case of polio was detected in Somalia on Aug. 11, 2014, the final sign of an outbreak with its roots in Nigeria — the one country where the virus had never been eradicated, even temporarily. But the last case in Nigeria was recorded on July 24, 2014.

According to Wikipedia, there were 416 cases worldwide in 2013, down from 350,000 in 1988. Since the polio virus only infects humans, this means that total eradication of the disease is now within reach.

The bad news is, polio still exists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and we have the CIA and the Taliban to thank for that. In 2011, while looking for Osama bin Laden, the CIA used an immunization campaign as a cover. When this news came out, it reinforced an already widespread belief that vaccines are a Western conspiracy to sterilize Moslems. This means that a lot of people in the region are now either avoiding immunization, or shooting at health workers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2015, @02:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2015, @02:40PM (#221699)

    Now that's a twisted logic. But then, without the help of the CIA (back at the time when Soviet Rusia was the enemy, and religious fanatism seemed the ideal weapon against atheist communism), the Taliban would not have existed anyway. [emperors-clothes.com] So even with that sort of twisted logic, the blame comes back to the CIA.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Informative=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday August 12 2015, @06:19PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday August 12 2015, @06:19PM (#221802)

    No, it's the Brits' fault because without all that tax on tea and whatnot the U.S. never would have existed to make a CIA organization to fund/train the Taliban to fight the Russians.

    Or maybe you could say it's the Protestants' fault for starting the Reformation which led to the Puritans wanting to come over in the first place. Although religion wasn't the only reason colonists came over.

    But more directly, it's fair to say that if the U.S. wasn't as powerful as it is militarily, the Taliban wouldn't be fighting us with asymmetric warfare. It's our own fault for having too-good technology :)

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2015, @08:01PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2015, @08:01PM (#221877)

      It's the fault of Columbus, because without Columbus, nobody in Europe would have known that America exists.

      But then, ultimately it's that meteorite's fault. Had that meteorite not extinguished the dinosaurs, humans would never have developed.