Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday August 12 2015, @05:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-what-I-wanted-to-hear dept.

Ads have long been part of the trade-off for users of the free Web, but the rise of ad blockers is making it increasingly difficult for publishers to sustain that ad-supported model.

That's according to a report published Monday by Adobe Systems and PageFair, a startup focused on assessing the cost of ad blocking and proposing alternatives.

While PageFair clearly has a vested interest in illustrating the negative effects of ad blocking, the findings of its study with Adobe are difficult to ignore. Most notably, ad blocking will cost publishers nearly $22 billion this year, it reported.

Ad blocking has grown by 41% globally in the last 12 months, the report found, amounting now to about 198 million active ad-block users around the world.

There were some interesting geographical differences highlighted in the report, too. For instance, in the U.S., ad blocking grew by 48% over the preceding 12 months to reach 45 million active users by June. In the U.K., ad blocking grew by 82% to reach 12 million active users over that same time frame.

Meanwhile, those numbers will surely be on the rise on the mobile side, Adobe noted in a blog post, given that Apple's iOS 9 will likely include ad-blocking features in Safari by default while Adblock Plus is already available in limited beta for Android.

Ad blocking represents "a major, growing problem for both digital publishers and marketers," said Greg Sterling, vice president for strategy and insights with the Local Search Association.

In many ways, the ad-blocking phenomenon is a response to security and privacy fears that have arisen in the culture at large and a rejection of the state of advertising on the PC internet, Sterling said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by meisterister on Wednesday August 12 2015, @06:38PM

    by meisterister (949) on Wednesday August 12 2015, @06:38PM (#221826) Journal

    ..but all of that energy and CPU time that their ads waste? That's costing US a pretty penny.

    One thing the advertisers may not have noticed is that their software is running on my computer, and I tend not to like it when that software decides it needs enough CPU power to melt my lap and kill any battery life I was hoping to enjoy.

    I've since gotten used to living in an adblocked world, and, quite frankly, it's jarring when I have to use someone else's computer without adblock. Webpages are littered with flashing, annoying bullshit that gets in the way of actually gleaning information from the site.

    --
    (May or may not have been) Posted from my K6-2, Athlon XP, or Pentium I/II/III.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2