SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the that's-what-I-wanted-to-hear dept.
Ads have long been part of the trade-off for users of the free Web, but the rise of ad blockers is making it increasingly difficult for publishers to sustain that ad-supported model.
That's according to a report published Monday by Adobe Systems and PageFair, a startup focused on assessing the cost of ad blocking and proposing alternatives.
While PageFair clearly has a vested interest in illustrating the negative effects of ad blocking, the findings of its study with Adobe are difficult to ignore. Most notably, ad blocking will cost publishers nearly $22 billion this year, it reported.
Ad blocking has grown by 41% globally in the last 12 months, the report found, amounting now to about 198 million active ad-block users around the world.
There were some interesting geographical differences highlighted in the report, too. For instance, in the U.S., ad blocking grew by 48% over the preceding 12 months to reach 45 million active users by June. In the U.K., ad blocking grew by 82% to reach 12 million active users over that same time frame.
Meanwhile, those numbers will surely be on the rise on the mobile side, Adobe noted in a blog post, given that Apple's iOS 9 will likely include ad-blocking features in Safari by default while Adblock Plus is already available in limited beta for Android.
Ad blocking represents "a major, growing problem for both digital publishers and marketers," said Greg Sterling, vice president for strategy and insights with the Local Search Association.
In many ways, the ad-blocking phenomenon is a response to security and privacy fears that have arisen in the culture at large and a rejection of the state of advertising on the PC internet, Sterling said.
(Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday August 13 2015, @01:07AM
I have been advocating for years that the solution is personal responsibility and selective attention away from ads, or from the negative feelings they seem to engender in some people (along with proper security measures to prevent actively malicious code).
Truly? Because it seems to be that ad blockers are the solution for many people, or they wouldn't use them. In addition to being annoying and increasing page load times, ad networks often spread malware. "personal responsibility" would fix nothing, as "personal responsibility" can't actually block ads. It's perfectly legitimate to control what you see on your own computer.
For obvious reasons this has always been met by increased hostility and waves of propaganda in favor of ad-block.
Probably because your "solution" is not a solution at all. And propaganda? Really? If someone wants to use an ad-blocker, I'm not sure how that is propaganda. The advertising companies, however, spew forth tons of propaganda; far more than any normal user could hope to spread.