Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday August 13 2015, @06:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-many-balls-are-too-many dept.

This story seems to almost be out of science fiction (or The Prisoner) but the pictures don't lie. The water people in Los Angeles are so desperate to save what water is left in some reservoirs that they are essentially putting a roof on it by filling the lakes with black plastic balls:

Facing a long-term water crisis, officials concerned with preserving a reservoir in Los Angeles hatched a plan: They would combat four years of drought with 96 million plastic balls.

On Monday, Mayor Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles arrived at the 175-acre Los Angeles Reservoir to release the final installment of the project: 20,000 small black orbs that would float atop the water. [...]

Mr. Garcetti said that the dark balls would help block sunlight and UV rays that promote algae growth, which would help keep the city's drinking water safe. Officials also said the balls would help slow the rate of evaporation, which drains the water supply of about 300 million gallons a year. The balls cost $0.36 each and are part of a $34.5 million initiative to protect the water supply.

This is an ingenious way of reducing evaporation. Perhaps the state's aqueduct system can also be filled with these balls to stop evaporation there.

HughPickens.com also submitted this article just minutes later!


Original Submission 1

Original Submission 2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by FlyingSock on Thursday August 13 2015, @07:28AM

    by FlyingSock (4339) on Thursday August 13 2015, @07:28AM (#222165)

    FIrst: You don't want no plastic in your water. You want plastic in your water.

    Second: These reservoirs have a huge surface area, even if you had a tarp large enough it would still be hanging in the water (which again implies plastic in the water) same goes for a net. Gravity's a bitch like that. You could of course now propose installing pylons or something to support the tarp. But unless you invest quite a lot this would probably not be stable enough, as the water may also be quite deep and there would be significant wind stress on the tarp.

    All in all I think the balls quite an elegant solution. A roof that carries itself by swimming on the surface. Of course the same solution could also have been achieved with other materials, but this would be significantly more expensive and not necessarily less harmful.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by quadrox on Thursday August 13 2015, @07:37AM

    by quadrox (315) on Thursday August 13 2015, @07:37AM (#222170)

    FIrst[sic]: Please read my title again. I am not saying what you think I am saying.

    Second: That's why you pull the ropes/net taut. As you said, tarp is probably not the ideal cover, some kind of dark cloth should do the trick though.

  • (Score: 2) by jimshatt on Thursday August 13 2015, @10:48AM

    by jimshatt (978) on Thursday August 13 2015, @10:48AM (#222212) Journal
    You wouldn't necessarily need pylons to the bottom. Floating pylons would suffice.
    • (Score: 2) by Tramii on Thursday August 13 2015, @03:52PM

      by Tramii (920) on Thursday August 13 2015, @03:52PM (#222360)

      Plastic floating pylons?

      • (Score: 2) by jimshatt on Friday August 14 2015, @08:55AM

        by jimshatt (978) on Friday August 14 2015, @08:55AM (#222742) Journal
        Lots and lots of them! Spherical pylons, preferably.