Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday August 13 2015, @03:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-way-to-charge-the-batteries-is-a-robot-disaster dept.

A computer science team at The University of Texas at Austin has found that robots evolve more quickly and efficiently after a virtual mass extinction modeled after real-life disasters such as the one that killed off the dinosaurs. Beyond its implications for artificial intelligence, the research supports the idea that mass extinctions actually speed up evolution by unleashing new creativity in adaptations.

Computer scientists Risto Miikkulainen and Joel Lehman co-authored the study published today in the journal PLOS One, which describes how simulations of mass extinctions promote novel features and abilities in surviving lineages.

"Focused destruction can lead to surprising outcomes," said Miikkulainen, a professor of computer science at UT Austin. "Sometimes you have to develop something that seems objectively worse in order to develop the tools you need to get better."

The original article from Science Daily.

The original source from The University of Texas.

The abstract of the study published in PLOS One.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday August 13 2015, @04:32PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 13 2015, @04:32PM (#222379) Journal

    Indeed, it's much better to live in a low-growth developed economy than in a fast-growing underdeveloped one.

    Until the low-growth developed economy trades places with the latter and becomes the low-growth underdeveloped economy.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 13 2015, @04:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 13 2015, @04:37PM (#222381)

    If that happens, either the low-growth developed economy was not really developed, but just less underdeveloped, or the developed economy stagnated not only at growth, but also at innovation, and therefore was out-innovated by the growing one (in that case, the developed economy is now actually shrinking, as the newcomer is eating its lunch).

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday August 14 2015, @12:20AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 14 2015, @12:20AM (#222600) Journal

      or the developed economy stagnated not only at growth, but also at innovation,

      This. Industry has been fleeing the developed world for a half century, productive scientific research has devolved into welfare for eggheads, and short term thinking has become amply rewarded. There are consequences to that.