Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday August 14 2015, @02:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the confusing-the-sciences dept.

Researchers developed a protein-based, genetically encodable system that can bind water-soluble uranium with exceedingly high affinity and selectivity. This also is the first time that a protein has been designed with these characteristics using exclusively natural amino acids.

This is the first known demonstration of a bacterial system used to mine ocean-based uranium that reduces the expense while increasing the selectivity of current methods available. The overall method developed could find broad applications in sequestration and bioremediation of water-soluble uranium and similar transuranic elements. This biotechnology method could also have similar applications to other low-concentration ions in solution.

Uranium plays an important role in the search for alternative energies to fossil fuels; however, uranium resources on land are limited. The oceans are estimated to contain 1,000 times as much uranium as is buried in deposits on land, but unfortunately, the uranium in the ocean is in the form of water-soluble uranyl (UO2 2+) which is present at a very low concentration (~13.7 nM). The uranyl is bound by carbonate and other anions, with the added complication that seawater also contains various metal ions at high concentrations, making separating the uranium extremely complex.

After years of trying to find an efficient and affordable way to extract uranyl, researchers at the University of Chicago, Peking University, and Argonne National Laboratory turned to biology. There are no naturally occurring proteins known to bind uranyl, but by adapting a computational screening strategy for protein-protein interactions, a potential uranyl-binding motif was designed. The scientists used the motif to search the Protein Data Bank for proteins that could accommodate or be adapted to accommodate uranyl. One candidate in initial binding experiments showed promise and was further optimized. The engineered, thermally stable protein called Super Uranyl-binding Protein (SUP) binds uranyl tightly (Kd of 7.4 femtomolar) and with high selectivity (>10,000-fold selectivity over other metal ions). The SUP was also confirmed to contain the computationally designed structural features through examination of the protein crystal structure. This protein can repeatedly sequester 30 to 60% of the uranyl in synthetic sea water and thus provides a much needed advance in the isolation of uranyl from seawater.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mr_mischief on Friday August 14 2015, @05:28PM

    by mr_mischief (4884) on Friday August 14 2015, @05:28PM (#222911)

    I doubt anyone's planning to put this into the oceans at large. I think the more likely goal would be to bring some seawater into a manmade reservoir, grow this stuff in it, extract the uranium for use as fission fuel, and evaporate out (or reverse osmosis filter, or distill, or ...) the water without the bacteria. Nobody wants to concentrate uranium in an ocean current and have to go track it down.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 14 2015, @08:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 14 2015, @08:56PM (#223003)

    Good points on running a batch process in a reservoir. That seems fairly safe.

    Since the concentration of Uranium in sea water is very low, I was imagining some kind of continuous process where sea water is run through a plant, with enough holding time for the "bugs" to do their job. Then all it takes is one slip with the output filtering and the bugs are loose in the ocean...

    Maybe the inventors will be clever enough to design "bugs" that live at some elevated temperature...and die if they are exposed to colder water in the ocean.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 15 2015, @01:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 15 2015, @01:30AM (#223096)

    Nobody wants to concentrate uranium in an ocean current

    Clearly, you haven't been paying attention to what megacorporations have been doing to the ecosystem for many many decades.

    and have to go track it down.

    Clearly, you didn't notice that after the Deepwater Horizon blowout and the subsequent devastation of the Gulf ecosystem, USA.gov ASSISTED in the coverup of the extent of the damage, hasn't required the responsible parties to actually clean up the mess, and has only delivered wrist slaps.

    ...and, BTW, while oil dispersant may make things -appear- better (out of sight; out of mind), it doesn't improve the situation, IT ACTUALLY MAKES THINGS WORSE. [washingtonpost.com]

    -- gewg_