Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Saturday August 15 2015, @04:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the Less-space-than-a-nomad dept.

Apple is building a self-driving car in Silicon Valley, and is scouting for secure locations in the San Francisco Bay area to test it, the Guardian has learned. Documents show the oft-rumoured Apple car project appears to be further along than many suspected.

In May, engineers from Apple’s secretive Special Project group met with officials from GoMentum Station, a 2,100-acre former naval base near San Francisco that is being turned into a high-security testing ground for autonomous vehicles.

In correspondence obtained by the Guardian under a public records act request, Apple engineer Frank Fearon wrote: “We would ... like to get an understanding of timing and availability for the space, and how we would need to coordinate around other parties who would be using [it].”

Automobile manufacturing is a radical departure from Apple's core business. Can they pull it off?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by TrumpetPower! on Saturday August 15 2015, @06:55PM

    by TrumpetPower! (590) <ben@trumpetpower.com> on Saturday August 15 2015, @06:55PM (#223330) Homepage

    You should stop thinking of these devices as "cars with optional autopilots" and instead as "fully roboticized taxis and limos." I guarantee you, Apple won't sell it with any user interface more direct than Siri. No steering wheel, no pedals, not even a joystick. Maybe a touchscreen, but only for the infotainment system, perhaps with an "advanced" mode that lets you tap your destination on a map. The chairs will likely swivel so those in front can turn and have a face-to-face conversation with those in the back. Probably even offer an option to black out or otherwise darken the windows so as to enhance the movie-watching experience.

    Once people expect the cars to do the driving for them, they'll be no more capable of saving the car from a crash than any other passenger. Nobody's going to spend any time supervising the car's driving, any more than you already spend supervising the driver's driving. Anything the car could detect and warn somebody about to take control, the car could avoid in the first place without intervention. And the time to get somebody's attention, explain the problem, and elicit a reasonable response...yeah...not gonna happen.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Sunday August 16 2015, @04:15AM

    by captain normal (2205) on Sunday August 16 2015, @04:15AM (#223448)

    Maybe, but last weekend I was nearly hit by a red sedan with a SciFi type setup on it's roof. It ran a stop sign right in front of me. Fortunately I still have fast reactions, and even though there were skid marks, avoided collision. A magnetic sign on the door said "Apple Maps". I assumed it was it was out doing the same thing as google street view. A couple of days later I saw the same (or a similar) vehicle run a stop sign in a different part of town. This second car had no sign on it. There seemed to be an actual driver in each car.
    After reading about the driverless car trials, I wonder if this was a test car. If so it needs a lot more work off of city streets. In any case I'm sure there will be some liability payments in Apple's future. And I'm kicking myself for reacting so fast. Probably could have gotten a newer SUV out of Apple.

    --
    When life isn't going right, go left.