Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday August 16 2015, @12:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the walkie-talkies-FTW dept.

The Supreme Court was asked in a petition to force the government to disclose the US clandestine plan to disable cell service during emergencies.
...
The Electronic Privacy Information Center told the high court's justices Tuesday that the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision created a new "catchall provision that can be used in any case involving records related to domestic and national security programs." (PDF)

The privacy group had demanded the documents from the Department of Homeland Security in 2011 following the shuttering of cell service in the San Francisco Bay Area subway system to quell a protest. The Department of Homeland Security refused to divulge the documents associated with SOP 303, which the appeals court described as a "unified voluntary process for the orderly shut-down and restoration of wireless services during critical emergencies such as the threat of radio-activated improvised explosive devices."

In recent protests in Hong Kong the government shutdown cell service in the area of the protests. The protesters used FireChat to get around the restrictions.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Gravis on Sunday August 16 2015, @02:32PM

    by Gravis (4596) on Sunday August 16 2015, @02:32PM (#223524)

    the DHS abused this power by cutting cell service to protesters. it seems like the court recognized this was bullshit and thus are exposing them to counteract said bullshit.

    the lesson here is that if you abuse your power, you will lose your power.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by btendrich on Sunday August 16 2015, @03:21PM

    by btendrich (3700) on Sunday August 16 2015, @03:21PM (#223536)

    You almost sound as if you believe that...

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JNCF on Sunday August 16 2015, @03:59PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Sunday August 16 2015, @03:59PM (#223543) Journal

    I'm not sure that the DHS was the one to shut down cellphone service. A naive reading of the summary/article would seem to suggest that, but it doesn't explicitly say it. It simply says that the request to the DHS was made chronologically following the shutdown, not that the DHS was involved in the shutdown. I remember previous articles on the subject acting like it was the Bay Area Rapid Transit Police who shut down service. According to BART, [bart.gov]

    Cell phone service was not interrupted outside BART stations.

    Not that we can trust them, or the DHS, or anyone.

  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Monday August 17 2015, @02:31AM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Monday August 17 2015, @02:31AM (#223729)

    the lesson here is that if you abuse your power, you will lose your power.

    You're right of course. If the Supreme Court abuse their power by going against the DHS's wishes, they'll lose their power.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @04:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @04:02AM (#223758)

    In case you haven't noticed the DHS is becoming the Communist/SJW enforcement arm... that arm should be cut off at the neck.