Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Sunday August 16 2015, @07:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the wax-on-wax-off dept.

conspiracy-theories dept.

If you haven't ever played Solitaire, Minesweeper, Hearts or FreeCell, it's safe to say you're in the minority. These simple Windows games have probably caused more lost worker hours than anything short of a worldwide coffee shortage. Whichever one was your favorite, the temptation to take just one more go at beating them—to get a faster time or a better score—was hard to ignore.

But as fun as these games were, they weren't actually designed for entertainment. At least not in their Windows incarnations.

The oldest of the four, Microsoft Solitaire, was first added to Windows 3.0 in 1990. Although the game (sometimes called "Patience") has existed since the late 1700s, this digital version seemed to be demonstrating that in the future we would no longer require a physical deck to play simple card games. But that's not what it was doing at all. Its real aim was far more modest: it was teaching mouse-fluency by stealth.

The intention was that Solitaire would get a generation of computer users still most familiar with a command-line input to teach themselves how to drag and drop, without realizing that's what they were doing. The fact that we're still dragging and dropping today suggests that it worked rather well.

http://mentalfloss.com/uk/technology/32106/the-true-purpose-of-solitaire-minesweeper-hearts-and-freecell

It is highly probable that SN members were aware of the true purpose of these games but the article seemed interesting nevertheless.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @01:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @01:18AM (#223704)

    > My comment wasn't intended, surprisingly, to be scientifically accurate.

    You criticize someone for a colloquialism that is not meant to be taken literally by offering up an argument that is not meant to be taken literally.
    Is your dick raw yet? Because your inane public masturbation is fucking tiresome.

    Now that I've got a killfile mechanism that works without logging in, you are #2 on the list - right after MDC.

  • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Monday August 17 2015, @07:15AM

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Monday August 17 2015, @07:15AM (#223811) Homepage

    Now that I've got a killfile mechanism that works without logging in, you are #2 on the list - right after MDC.

    Ooh, ouch, that really really hurts. No, really, stop it, you're breaking my heart. I think I may have to go and have a little cry.

    Boo-hoo. Ah-boo-hoo.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk