Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Thursday August 20 2015, @01:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the unsafe dept.

Islamic State militants beheaded Khaled al-Asaad, 82, a renowned antiquities scholar in the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra and hung his mutilated body on a column in a main square of the historic site because he apparently refused to reveal where valuable artifacts had been moved for safekeeping.

Before the city's capture by Isis, Syrian officials said they moved hundreds of ancient statues to safe locations out of concern they would be destroyed by the militants. Isis was likely to be looking for portable, easily saleable items that are not registered.

Unesco warned last month that looting had been taking place on an "industrial scale". Isis advertises its destruction of sites such as Nimrud in Iraq but says little about the way plundered antiquities help finance its activities. Stolen artefacts make up a significant stream of the group's estimated multi-million dollar revenues, along with oil sales and straightforward taxation and extortion.

Asaad had worked over the past few decades with US, French, German and Swiss archaeological missions on excavations and research in Palmyra's famed 2,000-year-old ruins. "He was a fixture, you can't write about Palmyra's history or anything to do with Palmyrian work without mentioning Khaled Asaad. It's like you can't talk about Egyptology without talking about Howard Carter."

Archaeological experts say Isis took over the already existing practice of illegal excavation and looting, which until 2014 was carried out by various armed groups, or individuals, or the Syrian regime. Isis initially levied 20% taxes on those it "licensed" to excavate but later began to hire its own own archaeologists, digging teams and machinery.

"Their systematic campaign seeks to take us back into pre-history. But they will not succeed."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Thexalon on Thursday August 20 2015, @03:46PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Thursday August 20 2015, @03:46PM (#225446)

    WHO IS TEACHING YOUNG PEOPLE THAT IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO BECOME A JIHADIST?!?!?!?!?!

    That's easy: Jihadists. Who are not, as you seem to think, the vast majority of local imams and other religious leaders. Indeed, the imams are at the forefront of trying to convince young Muslims that joining Daesh is anti-Islam.

    What you are continuing to refuse to do is recognize that approximately 99.9% of Muslims oppose Daesh (and other jihadist groups), and that far more are putting their lives on the line to oppose Daesh than are to fight for them. You do this in an attempt to justify atrocities on a scale that would make Francisco Franco, Josef Stalin, Chairman Mao, and Pol Pot seem like wimps.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Thursday August 20 2015, @03:59PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 20 2015, @03:59PM (#225454) Journal

    Exaggerate, much? You seem to suggest that I've called on the western world to just nuke the mideast.

    Atrocities? That is what is happening right now, today, everywhere within Daesh's power. Did you read the story about - uhhmm, I think it was 19 - women put to death because they refused to marry the swine? "Marry this soldier." "No, I don't want to marry him." "Then, die bitch!"

    Atrocities. Is it an atrocity to kill a man who is standing over the bodies of women and children he has butchered? If so, then I'm all for atrocities.

    • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Friday August 21 2015, @01:40AM

      by Grishnakh (2831) on Friday August 21 2015, @01:40AM (#225652)

      Is it an atrocity to kill a man who is standing over the bodies of women and children he has butchered? If so, then I'm all for atrocities.

      There's a whole bunch of groups of armed Muslims fighting Daesh right now; do you think they're worried about fighting them fairly? I don't. I'm sure the Kurds, Iraqis, Iranians, Jordanians, etc. would all be happy to exterminate every last Daesh if they had the ability to do it easily. I'm sure they'd also be happy to have you go over there and help them; there's already a few western soldiers who have gone over there voluntarily to fight them. One's been killed.

      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday August 21 2015, @02:25AM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 21 2015, @02:25AM (#225665) Journal

        Then it's time we did OUR PART.

        The Kurds have been clamoring for the weapons needed to do the job. Turkey objects to arming the Kurds. The US is honoring Turkey's objections. The Kurds have done a magnificent job, considering their very limited resources. The United States and Europe need to supply the Kurds with anything they ask for, up to and including armor. Then, we need to offer them air support. "We" - the US and Europe. And, if Turkey doesn't like it, we tell Turkey to go stuff themselves. We tell them as diplomatically as possible, but we tell them to fuck off.

        The Druze are just as dangerous as the Kurds, but alas, they have not yet been goaded into action. The Druze also have a complicated loyalty thing going - they are very reluctant to offend a host nation's government in any way. Syria would be very offended if the Druze were to arm themselves, separately from the Syrian army.

        The Yazidi? As far as I can tell, they've just run from every potential fight, abandoning their week and feeble. I've not read of one single time the Yazidi have stood and fought.

        Those are just the Christians in the affected area - Muslims also have various reactions to Daesh. One sect seeks to make peace with Daesh, some tribes hope to escape notice, others just pack up and leave.

        Aside from the Kurds, NO ONE is doing nearly enough to destroy an organization which poses an existential threat to almost all groups in the region.

        And, let me be very clear. Daesh does pose an existential threat to every government in the region, as well as every religious group or sect, in addition to the many different tribes.

        As evidenced by TFA, Daesh is intent on destroying any and all opposition, as well as destroying the history, the culture, and the legacy of any opposition. Complete and utter genocide for any and all who disagree with this supposed "Islamic State".