Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 21 2015, @06:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the fighting-over-office-space dept.

El Reg has published an article that suggests, at least according to one person in the LibreOffice community, that OpenOffice development is essentially moribund and Apache should abandon it.

Christian Schaller, a Red Hat Software Engineering Manager and GNOME developer, wrote an open letter to Apache saying that "the OpenOffice project is all but dead upstream since IBM pulled their developers off the project almost a year ago and has significantly fallen behind feature wise... I hope that now that it is clear that this effort has failed that you would be willing to re-direct people who go to the openoffice.org website to the LibreOffice website instead."

A member of the Apache OpenOffice team was quick to respond: "We think Apache OpenOffice as released has been a huge success," he said. "Most of us don't really like the direction LibreOffice is heading to."

That said, the most recent OpenOffice update, version 4.1.1, was published nearly a year ago, and while the source code repository does show recent activity, it is much less than that for LibreOffice, as a quick browse of GitHub stats will confirm.

Other coverage can be found here.

I use LibreOffice when I'm in Linux and OpenOffice when I'm in MacOS X. Personally, I prefer them both to MS Office, although I do have MS Office on the Mac only because the people I work with don't use anything else. Are there any Soylentils here beside myself who use either one of these free products?


Note by Subsentient: Changed title from "Wither OpenOffice?"

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by mcgrew on Friday August 21 2015, @04:36PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday August 21 2015, @04:36PM (#225920) Homepage Journal

    Microsoft Office is beating the hell out of the rest because it's so often mandatory. I much prefer Open Office Write to Microsoft's word processor, but magazines only take submissions in Microsoft Word format. And I absolutely HATE that word processor, getting away from it was one reason I was so happy to retire. Now that I'm going to submit stories to magazines, once again it's mandatory. (Excel is the best spreadsheet, even with that awful ribbon interface, but the ribbon isn't the worst thing about Word)

    As to "die, open office," it's the usual flamebait from The Register. The last time I tried Libre Office it didn't have full justification, which is absolutely necessary for me, since I publish my books straight out a PDF made by the Open Office file.

    It's installed on my computer, does well what I need it to do, it's going to take a very big reason for me to switch to anything else. I'll still write the stories in Oo, then copy and paste to Word.

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Friday August 21 2015, @06:57PM

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Friday August 21 2015, @06:57PM (#225976) Journal

    What I want to know is, what exactly makes you hate Word?

    I have used all three, OpenOffice, LibreOffice and MS Office. When MS rolled out Office 2010 everyone threw a shit fit because of the ribbon interface. I use MS Office at work. I have no choice so I got used to it. You know what? I find the ribbon interface to be much more intuitive and easier to use. Going back to the other offices feels clumsy. Tabbed menus instead of toolbars provides you with a clean interface.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @10:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @10:33PM (#226071)

      Do you remember when the Ribbon was the way of the future, and soon everybody would be changing their interfaces to that style?

      Didn't happen, did it?

      The Ribbon isn't nearly as incredible as people think. I won't use Microsoft Office because of it being there.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by mcgrew on Saturday August 22 2015, @03:06PM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Saturday August 22 2015, @03:06PM (#226271) Homepage Journal

      Yes, I know quite a few people who like the ribbon, I hate it. I liked Word 97, I can't FIND anything in Word, like how to shut off "smart quotes". When I can find a control it takes forever. Microsoft makes it worse by naming everything unconventionally. Why is the hell did they rename "edit" to "home?" That's just brain-dead stupid. It's like Microsoft wants all their software to be as complicated (not complex, deliberately complicated) to use as possible while taking away user control.

      --
      mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Justin Case on Saturday August 22 2015, @11:57PM

      by Justin Case (4239) on Saturday August 22 2015, @11:57PM (#226449) Journal

      > what exactly makes you hate Word?

      1. It is a product of Microsoft, a company which has done me personally far more harm over my lifespan than terrorists have. Multiply that by millions of customers and...

      2. It is a product of Microsoft, which guarantees it will fail frequently, randomly, and usually spectacularly.

      3. It is a product of Microsoft, which means they will try to force me to upgrade and relearn every couple years.

      4. That damned ribbon, which occupies way too much screen space, and hides capabilities, resulting in wasted hours hunting for stuff that used to be right there, easy to find.

      5. When it craps on my document -- and it will -- it will just say "oh well, I guess you're hosed again sucker". Open/Libre Office however will frequently save the day in these situations.

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @07:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @07:53PM (#225998)

    The last time I tried Libre Office it didn't have full justification, which is absolutely necessary for me, since I publish my books straight out a PDF made by the Open Office file.

    That seems a little hard to believe, that is such a basic feature for a word processor that I would have expected it to always be there. Do you remember which version? I checked my netbook which has 4.0.6.2 installed on it and "full justification" is there in plain view. If you can provide a specific version, I'd like to check, but obviously I'm not going to check all the versions.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @08:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @08:36PM (#226012)

    Without specifying A VERSION NUMBER, that isn't calling out an actual format.

    This paradigm ONLY WORKS IF YOU STAY ON THE M$ TREADMILL and constantly pay M$ their filthy lucre.
    Try sending your "M$-standard" document to someone who doesn't use THE SAME VERSION and you are headed for problems.

    ...and it gives me great pleasure each time this topic arises to mention that the solution to a "M$-standard" document that won't open with M$'s own app is to open that with LibreOffice.
    Never seen it fail.

    At that point it is anticlimatic to take the recovered document back to M$'s app--but some folks don't comprehend irony.

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @10:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 21 2015, @10:38PM (#226073)

    magazines only take submissions in Microsoft Word format

    File -> Save As... -> File Type -> .doc

    The last time I tried Libre Office it didn't have full justification

    Format -> Alignment -> Justified