Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 21 2015, @09:59AM   Printer-friendly
from the touching-development dept.

Social practices and cultural beliefs of modern life are preventing healthy brain and emotional development in children, according to an interdisciplinary body of research presented recently at a symposium at the University of Notre Dame.
...
"Breast-feeding infants, responsiveness to crying, almost constant touch and having multiple adult caregivers are some of the nurturing ancestral parenting practices that are shown to positively impact the developing brain, which not only shapes personality, but also helps physical health and moral development," says Narvaez.

Studies show that responding to a baby's needs (not letting a baby "cry it out") has been shown to influence the development of conscience; positive touch affects stress reactivity, impulse control and empathy; free play in nature influences social capacities and aggression; and a set of supportive caregivers (beyond the mother alone) predicts IQ and ego resilience as well as empathy.

The United States has been on a downward trajectory on all of these care characteristics, according to Narvaez. Instead of being held, infants spend much more time in carriers, car seats and strollers than they did in the past. Only about 15 percent of mothers are breast-feeding at all by 12 months, extended families are broken up and free play allowed by parents has decreased dramatically since 1970.

On the other side, there's hand-wringing about helicopter parenting.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Friday August 21 2015, @09:23PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Friday August 21 2015, @09:23PM (#226038)

    Why don't they teach parenting at school?

    Because you'll piss people off by having the government teach morals, effectively. The religious people will be pissed that the parenting course doesn't include teaching kids how important $RELIGION is, and other people will be pissed that the parenting course doesn't teach how vaccinating your kids will give them autism, while other people will be pissed that they're taught that helicopter parenting hurts kids, while other people will be pissed that they're taught that leaving your kids in day care all day and never spending much time with them hurts them, I could go on and on.

    Just look at how hard a time state governments are having with making vaccines mandatory; if they try to teach proper parenting there'll be a revolution (and like the revolutions in the Middle East, the new government will be composed of a bunch of religious loonies; it'll be much worse than what we have now).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Justin Case on Sunday August 23 2015, @01:33PM

    by Justin Case (4239) on Sunday August 23 2015, @01:33PM (#226654) Journal

    > you'll piss people off by having the government teach morals, effectively. The religious people will be pissed that the parenting course doesn't include teaching kids how important $RELIGION is, and other people will be pissed that the parenting course doesn't teach how vaccinating your kids will give them autism, while other people will be pissed that they're taught that helicopter parenting hurts kids

    Hmmm. Maybe education shouldn't be a politically* driven activity.

    * Interpretation for the hard-of-thinking: government funded.

    • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Sunday August 23 2015, @02:56PM

      by Grishnakh (2831) on Sunday August 23 2015, @02:56PM (#226663)

      Hmmm. Maybe education shouldn't be a politically* driven activity.

      * Interpretation for the hard-of-thinking: government funded.

      Ok great, so you're going to deny education to poor people? That's a wonderful idea. We'll have a giant underclass of people with no education whatsoever and no way to get any kind of job or get out of poverty, and pretty soon there'll be food riots. Do you really want to live in a 3rd world country?

      • (Score: 2) by Justin Case on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:10PM

        by Justin Case (4239) on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:10PM (#226666) Journal

        I did not propose denying anybody anything. Just that, if it has some value, you ought to exchange something else of value to get it.

        Are you saying some people have no value whatsoever?

        And why do we have so many poor people anyway? Didn't their government education teach them how to avoid poverty?

        Or perhaps the government taught you that you must depend on the government for everything.

        • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Sunday August 23 2015, @04:00PM

          by Grishnakh (2831) on Sunday August 23 2015, @04:00PM (#226673)

          You're a fucking lunatic.

          • (Score: 2) by Justin Case on Sunday August 23 2015, @04:28PM

            by Justin Case (4239) on Sunday August 23 2015, @04:28PM (#226677) Journal

            I see you obtained your superior debating skills in a government school.