Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Saturday August 22 2015, @09:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the just-like-aliens dept.

Long-term cryogenic and hibernative sleep may be the key to getting humans to Mars — and beyond. But with research and funding active concerns, it may first come to a spa near you.

Our bodies aren't meant for space. It's heartbreaking for science fiction fans to hear, but it's also a self-evident fact. Our bodies require too much maintenance to speed through the stars. We need a steady supply of those things absent from space —namely water, food and oxygen. We crave warmth but won't find it in deep space, where the average temperature is minus 455 degrees Fahrenheit.

Even if we could survive in an icy vacuum without sustenance, we'd probably go insane without distractions and room to move. In 2013, participants in a 17-month Russian spaceflight simulation became depressed and lethargic in the cramped quarters. They grew desperate for privacy and often skipped exercises that would be crucial during a real spaceflight.

Ensuring space travellers stay healthy and active during long flights is a puzzle with two pieces: cargo and weight. Food, water, exercise equipment and televisions are heavy. Fuel is expensive and volatile. The more weight you're bringing into space, the more fuel you need. But aeronautic engineers (of SpaceWorks) believe they have found the key to solving that puzzle: put your space travellers to sleep.

https://vanwinkles.com/latest-science-of-cryogenic-sleep-human-hibernation-for-space-travel

[Also Covered By]: http://gizmodo.com/how-traveling-to-deep-space-in-cryogenic-sleep-could-ac-1725605323

[Related Blog]: http://spacetorpor.blogspot.com/

[Related NASA Coverage]: http://www.nasa.gov/content/torpor-inducing-transfer-habitat-for-human-stasis-to-mars/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Farkus888 on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:40AM

    by Farkus888 (5159) on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:40AM (#226529)

    Weight is still very relevant until it is in space. If food and water systems for us to be awake are lighter than the freezer for cryogenic sleep then the logistics of launching are easier if we are awake and bored.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:00PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Sunday August 23 2015, @03:00PM (#226664)

    No, weight isn't important at all. Only Americans think it is, because they cannot understand mass due to their unit system and poor education.

    What's important is MASS. Even in space with zero-g, mass has inertia; more mass requires more thrust and more fuel to move around.