Microsoft has now released three cumulative updates for Windows 10. These updates combine security fixes with non-security bug fixes, and so far, Microsoft hasn't done a very good job of describing the contents of these cumulative updates. While the security content is quite fully described, explanations of the non-security fixes have been lacking.
Many, including your author, feel that this is undesirable and that a key part of the Windows-as-a-Service concept, in which Microsoft releases a steady stream of fixes and functional improvements, is a clear explanation of what those updates are. This is a new approach for Microsoft, and it seems like reassuring users and administrators that issues are getting fixed—and that functional changes are clearly described—should be important.
...
Unfortunately, it does not seem that the company intends to change this approach. Company representatives told The Register that while the company "may choose" to perform "additional promotion" of new features depending on their "significance," there's no intention of providing full release notes. This means that future patches are going to continue to say nothing more than "This update includes improvements to enhance the functionality of Windows 10."
Anybody want off the Microsoft train yet?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 25 2015, @06:14AM
Free choice involves knowledge of one's choices. Many people lack that knowledge. No knowledge = no choice.
I've pretty much given up on W10 and now use Xubuntu almost exclusively.
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Tuesday August 25 2015, @12:52PM
I'm on devuan Linux. Not interested in systemd either.
My friend that uses Windows did the free upgrade to 10, and in a day or so downgraded again. It seems none of his games worked on 10.
-- hendrik
(Score: 2) by etherscythe on Tuesday August 25 2015, @06:04PM
This surprises me. Which games? Were they modern, or designed for XP?
"Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"