Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Thursday August 27 2015, @12:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the patent-unlocked dept.

The German high court has upheld an earlier ruling, that Apple's "Slide to Unlock" Patent (EU Patent 1964022) is a trivial extension of the state of the art embodied by the Swedish Neonode N1 released in 2003 (with Windows CE), and is therefore invalid.

From Reuters:

The Neonode N1 had substantially similar technical features, the patent court had found. It ruled Apple's easier-to-use interface was not in itself patentable. Neonode sold tens of thousands of phones before declaring bankruptcy in 2008. It reorganized itself as an intellectual property firm licensing its patented optical technology for use in phones, tablets, readers and other touchscreen devices.

Motorola Mobility, at the time a unit of Google Inc but now owned by China's Lenovo Group Ltd, filed the original suit in a Munich court against the Apple user interface patent. Apple won that case but the ruling was later overturned by the federal patent court.

Also at Heise (German).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:26PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:26PM (#228611)
    Why? Choosing and creating a virtual analog is not as straight-forward as you imagine, especially when you haven't been granted several years of hindsight. And, no, you never had a physical slide-to-unlock button on your dumbphone.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:31PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:31PM (#228616)

    > And, no, you never had a physical slide-to-unlock button on your dumbphone.

    Sure did, but it was on the right side. I should have patented putting it on the left and/or the front

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:47PM

      by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 27 2015, @03:47PM (#228621)
      How did it display a variable unlock image?
      --
      🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday August 27 2015, @04:26PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Thursday August 27 2015, @04:26PM (#228635)

        The gap on one side got smaller as the gap on the other side got bigger. Not the best show on earth, for sure.

        • (Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday August 27 2015, @04:49PM

          by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 27 2015, @04:49PM (#228642)
          Also not covered in Apple's patent.
          --
          🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by c0lo on Thursday August 27 2015, @05:35PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 27 2015, @05:35PM (#228660) Journal

    And, no, you never had a physical slide-to-unlock button on your dumbphone.

    You sure?
    The 'too bad they never made any sequels', do you remember it? [laptopmag.com])

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 27 2015, @08:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 27 2015, @08:00PM (#228706)

    I said slide to whatever, not a physical slide to unlock, and i wasn't talking about just phones. And yes, it is fucking trivial to make slide to whatever in software. The patentable part could be the touch part of the phone, which it has been, but using that slide motion on a touch screen to do a function is not patentable.