Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday August 27 2015, @01:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the get-off-my-lawn dept.

in the long run the fortunes of nations are determined by population trends. Japan is not only the world's fastest-aging major economy (already every fourth person is older than 65, and by 2050 that share will be nearly 40 percent), its population is also declining. Today's 127 million will shrink to 97 million by 2050, and forecasts show shortages of the young labor force needed in construction and health care. Who will maintain Japan's extensive and admirably efficient transportation infrastructures? Who will take care of millions of old people? By 2050 people above the age of 80 will outnumber the children.

Who will take care of millions of old people? Robots!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by curunir_wolf on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:11PM

    by curunir_wolf (4772) on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:11PM (#228754)

    Given Japan's history, their xenophobia is quite reasonable. They have usually been independent, and have been repeatedly attacked by outsiders. (Yeah, more recently in WWII they returned the favor, but that's ONE instance. Japan has a long history of repelling invaders. Sort of like Britain, only more successfully.)

    Yea, you should probably check again. Japan first invaded Korea in the 16th century, and Korea was actually run as a colony of Japan starting around 1910 (they were a part of the Japanese Empire from some time in the 1850's). So Japan's imperialism goes back much further than you give them credit for.

    --
    I am a crackpot
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 27 2015, @11:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 27 2015, @11:30PM (#228783)

    Yeah. For the last 700 years, Japan has pretty much always been the aggressor. [wikipedia.org]

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Friday August 28 2015, @12:53AM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 28 2015, @12:53AM (#228801) Journal

    And Britain invaded France, and ran part of France as, essentially, a colony. (Ever hear of Joan of Arc?) But Britain was invaded by the Norse, the Danes, and Angles, the Romans, The French (though you could claim those were Norse, the one's I mean started out from Normandy).

    Nobody's ancestors were peaceful. Only some of them. That goes for countries as well as people. But Japan was more successful at fighting off invasions than Britain was, probably because their "channel" was a lot wider.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.