Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 27 2015, @06:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the Game-On! dept.

If you're like me and dig a good RTS game but run Linux as your primary desktop, today is your lucky day:

Exactly one year to the day after writing Company of Heroes 2 might be coming to Linux, today marks the planned release of the Linux port of CoH 2.

Company of Heroes 2 for Linux isn't up on Steam at the moment, but it's expected to appear there within the next few hours. As mentioned last week with regards to the system requirements, this Linux/OSX game port by Feral Interactive Games lists Intel or NVIDIA graphics as the requirement. "Requires an Intel Iris Pro graphics card or an NVIDIA 600 series graphics card or better with driver version 352.21 or later." But a GeForce GTX 760 or better is what Feral recommends for the game on Linux. There's no mention at all of AMD Catalyst or RadeonSI support, so we'll just have to see what goes wrong with it later today...

No, this isn't a soyvertisement. I just dig when good games and Linux meet.


[Ed. additions] Also noted on twitter:

Feral Interactive on Twitter: "Mac Linux ready their armies: Company of Heroes 2 will arrive Aug 27 on Steam and soon after on MAS. Minisite: http://t.co/VUysnoVnR6"

Also, it appears that it will have per-platform multiplayer.

Nice GamingonLinux article/review of the release.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by gman003 on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:29PM

    by gman003 (4155) on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:29PM (#228763)

    They have always required use of the Steam Client to actually launch games. They have a URL protocol such that a browser link can call the Steam Client to launch a game, but it still goes through the Steam Client, and it always has.

    The "check which computer is being used to access your account" thing is DRM to protect your account, not to protect the games. Because many users' libraries are high-value targets, there's a lot of scammers and hackers. They have computer validation (on by default) and two-factor authentication (opt-in IIRC, but I use it) specifically to protect your games not from you, but from those who would take them from you.

    You can trivially bypass the single-running-copy-of-a-game limit by using Offline Mode, and the computer verification doesn't do anything to stop multiple machines being used at once. Running multiple instances of Steam on a single account is actually necessary for some features, like in-home streaming.

    The social media is sometimes annoying, I'll admit, but they have at least avoided every possible pitfall with it. They don't require real names, they don't restrict name changes, they don't force you to use any third-party social media (linking with Facebook is optional and actually kind of hard to find, it's not in-your-face in the slightest), and you can make your profile private (nobody can see it) or friends-only (only users you've added as friends can see it). I only rarely use any of it - mostly friend chat - but when I do, it's quite useful, and since the only real downside is that it exists and takes up space in the UI (which, yes, is not the greatest), I'm fine with that tradeoff. Granted, I use the actual Steam Client almost all the time, since that's what you use to launch the actual games (which I use more than the community stuff).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:56PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 27 2015, @10:56PM (#228772) Journal
    Staying true to the fine title of the thread (TFTT?), I'm almost tempted to give it a go and try to run those games I bought about 5 years ago (they are no longer available in the "current catalogue on offer").
    Maybe I'd be able to make the point (supported by evidence) of "Steam - may be milder but it's still DRM. Look, I can't redownload and run those games which I paid" - but... it simply doesn't worth my bother.
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by gman003 on Thursday August 27 2015, @11:24PM

      by gman003 (4155) on Thursday August 27 2015, @11:24PM (#228781)

      Out of curiosity, what games did you have that are no longer available? I can think of only a few that were removed, and I've been on Steam for a decade. One was a free promo for Half-Life 2 - withdrawn because the company that made it went out of business, their domain was bought by a porn site, and nobody had the source code to change the hardcoded URL in the credits. Another one was Arkham Knight, which was withdrawn from sale until they can patch it enough to be playable. The last I can think of was an indie game that turned out to be literally unfinished, and was suspended as a probable scam. In the latter two cases, if you own the game you can still download it, but no new sales are permitted.

      And while Steam is, indeed, a form of DRM, I don't think "can't download games you bought" is necessarily related to that. GoG, for example, is a DRM-free marketplace, but I doubt they'd let you download games if they somehow lost the license to sell those particular games. Consider the analogy to a physical copy. (If you're paranoid about this, Steam itself has a "back up games" utility).

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Marand on Friday August 28 2015, @12:31AM

        by Marand (1081) on Friday August 28 2015, @12:31AM (#228795) Journal

        Out of curiosity, what games did you have that are no longer available? I can think of only a few that were removed, and I've been on Steam for a decade

        Fable 3 is one example that I own. It got removed from the store after the gfwl stuff died off, to be replaced by the publisher with a different version or something, but it's still available for download, install, and play for anyone that bought it before removal. (There were also a bunch of Marvel-license games that vanished after a disagreement or license expiration, but I didn't own any of them.)

        So, games do vanish sometimes, but Valve doesn't retroactively remove it from your library, unlike Amazon did years ago to Kindle owners.

      • (Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Friday August 28 2015, @02:59AM

        by Hairyfeet (75) <bassbeast1968NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday August 28 2015, @02:59AM (#228824) Journal

        Actually there are quite a few games where the original version has been removed and now there is only the director's cut or some such. An example is Deus Ex: HR, all you can get is the directors edition now, not the original which I have. IIRC there was also a handful yanked by one particular publisher as they were being sued by a couple of dev houses saying they did not have the right to sell the games on a digital service, sorry that I can't remember the games but it was in a genre i didn't care about.

        --
        ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2015, @04:09PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2015, @04:09PM (#229044)

      It depends on the game. For instance, I just launched Starbound without going through Steam, even though it was downloaded and installed through the service.

      May I also recommend Humble Bundle. The games are usually DRM-Free and you often get a Steam key if you want to use it.

      Gog.com is also very nice. And DRM-Free.