Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 28 2015, @06:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the studying-what-to-study dept.

The article comes out of the Australian press, but unless there's something truly unique about the Australian job market, it's almost certainly true elsewhere as well: a recent study shows more than half of young Australians are receiving college education to persue careers that will soon no longer exist. Thank robotics, industry consolidation, and the nature of the markets for the shrinking number of ways you will some day be able to earn a living.

There's a flip side to the debate, of course: there are certainly new things coming that haven't even been invented yet, that will provide job opportunities. But the trick is positioning yourself appropriately to take advantage of the new chances.

The not-for-profit group, which works with young Australians to create social change, says the national curriculum is stuck in the past and digital literacy, in particular, needs to be boosted. Foundation chief executive Jan Owen says young people are not prepared for a working life that could include five career changes and an average of 17 different jobs.

She says today's students will be affected by three key economic drivers: automation, globalisation and collaboration. "Many jobs and careers are disappearing because of automation," Ms Owen said. "The second driver is globalisation — a lot of different jobs that we're importing and exporting. And then thirdly collaboration which is all about this new sharing economy."

How does one future-proof his/her life and career?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2015, @02:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 28 2015, @02:44PM (#228987)

    The biggest problem I can see is that if everyone has the same minimum, guaranteed income what's to stop the prices of essentials being inflated to swallow up all of that income and require people to find extra ways of earning money again to survive?

    Regulation, duh. Without capitalism as the primary survival method there's no reason for the intentional inflation we've had going on for centuries. Rather than 'motivating people to spend and invest', the reason for the intentional inflation, keeping prices stable would be the goal, or possibly the slightest level of deflation so we could perhaps go back to the gold standard after a century or two.