Science is a messy, error fraught business, which is why reproducibility is so essential. Unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be one of psychology's strong suits, according to a massive analysis published yesterday in Science.
A years-long effort to reproduce more than 100 psychology studies across three leading journals paints a pretty dismal picture. When re-tested by independent research psychologists, the conclusions of more than 60 studies on personality, relationships, learning, and memory, turned out to be far less whelming. Strongly significant findings often became weaker, while weakly significant findings became non-existent.
http://gizmodo.com/a-lot-of-published-psychology-results-are-bullshit-1727228060
[Source]: The New York Times
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday August 30 2015, @05:24AM
I suppose that I should look up subluxation, and dr. bob, and offer some witty response.
I'll just stay out of the polluted gene pools to avoid catching it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 30 2015, @12:42PM
It's a reference to one of the few great trolls of pre-beta /.'s later years.