Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 31 2015, @07:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-about-time dept.

A pretty nice addition to [the third developer preview of the OS formerly known as Android M] is granular control over the permissions [which] each and every app requires upon installing it, giving Android users "meaningful choice of control". Just like in iOS, apps in Android 6.0 Marshmallow will only [allow] you to grant them a certain permission immediately before the app needs it and not in bulk during the installation, [as was the case] in previous Android installments.

[...] Android 6.0 Marshmallow officially introduces API Level 23, which is one of the requirements to have app permissions that can be granted on demand. All Android apps need to be updated [by their developers] so that they support the brand new API0 Level 23 libraries in order to introduce the individual granular app permissions.

SiliconANGLE notes that 6.0 is also getting native fingerprint support, a new power-saving mode, and Android Pay.
They also note

Hardly anyone with an existing Android phone will ever get to use [6.0].

[...] Android-powered devices rely on the manufacturer to update the operating system and the reality is that it rarely happens.

To put it more crudely, the Android update process is f**ked.

[...] [As Android remains open source and free to use,] Google can't force manufacturers to come to the party in terms of upgrades [any] more than it can force manufacturers to stop skinning their Android installs with their own custom user interfaces and software.

Release of Android 6.0 is expected in 2015Q4.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by rigrig on Monday August 31 2015, @05:17PM

    by rigrig (5129) Subscriber Badge <soylentnews@tubul.net> on Monday August 31 2015, @05:17PM (#230287) Homepage

    It is not that simple.

    You're definitely right there.

    It is supposed to be an alliance. Blackmailing partners is definitely not a good move.

    Maybe, but Google has already stopped Acer from producing phones with an alternative OS for being too Android-like: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/09/google-blocked-acers-rival-phone-to-prevent-android-fragmentation/ [arstechnica.com]
    If "preventing Android fragmentation" is a good cause, why wouldn't "keeping Android devices secure" be?
    They don't need to mandate providing upgrades to the last version of Android, but timely patches for severe vulnerabilities until N years after last unit sold would be nice.

    Also agreements/contracts are already signed, changing them after the fact to someone's disadvantage be difficult.

    This is true, although I wouldn't know how far into the future those contracts extend. I very much doubt that Google has granted blanket licenses for any future devices for the rest of eternity.

    --
    No one remembers the singer.