Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 31 2015, @09:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the time-to-start-torrenting-on-a-gigabit-connection dept.

PC World reports on the story of an American teenager who has been sentenced to eleven years in jail and who will have his Internet use monitored by the government for the rest of his life.

His crime was to assume that his Constitutionally-protected Freedom of Speech included posting pro-ISIS messages on Twitter and other social media.

"Today's sentencing demonstrates that those who use social media as a tool to provide support and resources to ISIL will be identified and prosecuted with no less vigilance than those who travel to take up arms with ISIL," said U.S. Attorney Dana Boente...

[Ali Shukri Amin] created the Twitter account @AmreekiWitness in 2014, and used it to provide advice and encouragement to ISIS and its supporters, according to court documents. At one point the account had over 4,000 followers. He also helped other ISIS supporters who sought to travel to Syria to join the group, according to the Justice Department.

The question that Soylentils should ask is, "What groups do I belong to that someone in government might decide are 'terrorist', and am I at risk for speaking out?"

The Canadian government for instance has come within a hair of declaring prominent environmental groups to be terrorists.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by RedBear on Monday August 31 2015, @11:50AM

    by RedBear (1734) on Monday August 31 2015, @11:50AM (#230109)

    Your ignorance is overwhelming. I stated, quite clearly, that censorship is bad. Then, I pointed out, just as clearly, that it wasn't just censorship. The dumbass was convicted of crimes far greater than merely posting his opinion that Daesh is great and wonderful, or that he believes the United States to be the Great Satan. Aiding and abetting the enemy is treason. Treason is punishable by death, or such other punishment is deemed appropriate by the court - whether courts civil, or courts martial. Treason. Serious shit, man.

    To be fair, your original post was worded in such a way as to make it easy to interpret it as you hypocritically supporting censorship "in this case". There is only one short, ambiguous sentence that can be interpreted as indicating that you understood that the defendant did something beyond speech.

    Be more clear next time and people won't go off half-cocked.

    --
    ¯\_ʕ◔.◔ʔ_/¯ LOL. I dunno. I'm just a bear.
    ... Peace out. Got bear stuff to do. 彡ʕ⌐■.■ʔ
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2