Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 01 2015, @08:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-"talk-softly-and-CARRY-a-big-stick" dept.

Oder Aderet reports at Haaretz that the United States considered using nuclear weapons against Afghanistan in response to the September 11 attack according to Michael Steiner, who served as a political advisor to then-German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, as reported in Der Spiegel. "The papers were written," Steiner said when asked whether the U.S. had considered using nuclear weapons in response to the attacks orchestrated by Al-Qaida's Osama bin Laden, in which almost 3,000 people were killed. "They had really played through all possibilities." Steiner added that Schröder feared that the US, which was in a state of shock following the attacks, would overreact. "After Sept. 11, the entire administration positively dug in. We no longer had access to Rice, much less to the president. It wasn't just our experience, but also that of the French and British as well. Of course that made us enormously worried."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @08:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @08:55AM (#230708)

    Were many buildings burned down using jet fuel during WW2?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by zugedneb on Tuesday September 01 2015, @09:09AM

    by zugedneb (4556) on Tuesday September 01 2015, @09:09AM (#230715)

    jet fuel burned up in the explosion.
    it does not hang around and burn for 5-6 hours.

    --
    old saying: "a troll is a window into the soul of humanity" + also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @09:13AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @09:13AM (#230718)

      Tell us how you did it.

  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @11:11AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 01 2015, @11:11AM (#230745)

    jet fuel can't melt steel beams maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by zugedneb on Tuesday September 01 2015, @03:19PM

      by zugedneb (4556) on Tuesday September 01 2015, @03:19PM (#230839)

      Generally for something burning in air to give of max energy, there has to be an abundance of O2.
      In those circumstances, I can not see how there was abundance of O2.
      Many think, jet fuel behaves like the flame coming out of jets, but there is compressed and enormous amounts of fucking air in jet engine.
      Crevice and shaft in wall NOT same as jet engine.

      --
      old saying: "a troll is a window into the soul of humanity" + also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax