Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Wednesday September 02 2015, @01:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the together-we-drive dept.

The Center for American Progress reports:

Uber's business model is on the rocks [September 1] after [Federal Judge Edward Chen] granted class-action status to a lawsuit targeting the company's treatment of drivers as independent contractors.

[...] There are 160,000 drivers who will be party to the current lawsuit alleging that drivers are full employees of Uber with full labor law protections, rather than independent contractors. Any person who drove for Uber in California since mid-August 2009 and is not subject to a binding arbitration clause in her contract with the company will be considered part of the case.

[...] A jury trial will still determine whether Uber drivers meet the legal definition of employees--in which case the company would owe massive amounts of back pay to all eligible drivers--or not. And Chen did not give the drivers everything they wanted. The judge rejected class status for drivers' claims involving Uber policy around reimbursing expenses like gas, tolls, and the cost involved in a canceled fare.

[...] The cost of paying back wages and payroll taxes for the entire class, while certainly smaller than the $50 billion that the company is currently worth according to investors, would be vast.

takyon: Also at MarketWatch. In Seattle, City Council members have announced a bill that could allow Uber, Lyft, and other for-hire drivers to unionize.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Wednesday September 02 2015, @07:21PM

    by deimtee (3272) on Wednesday September 02 2015, @07:21PM (#231405) Journal

    Isn't that their claimed business model? Or at least it used to be, sharing the cost of driving to somewhere you were going anyway.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday September 02 2015, @07:43PM

    by VLM (445) on Wednesday September 02 2015, @07:43PM (#231417)

    I actually looked and I'm guessing thats lyft. Or another competitor. Uber is the wanna be taxi driver one of the crowd.

    They (all?) seem to distance themselves from from the old college travel rideshare board mentality.

    • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Thursday September 03 2015, @10:31PM

      by deimtee (3272) on Thursday September 03 2015, @10:31PM (#232007) Journal

      I could be mixing them up with Lyft. Or Maybe they pushed the rideshare angle a bit more here in Oz.
      If they claimed to be unlicenced taxis here, they would get shut down pretty damn fast.

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.