When we talk about artificial intelligence (AI), what do we actually mean ?
AI experts and philosophers are beavering away on the issue. But having a usable definition of AI – and soon – is vital for regulation and governance because laws and policies simply will not operate without one.
This definition problem crops up in all regulatory contexts, from ensuring truthful use of the term “AI” in product advertising right through to establishing how next-generation Automated Weapons Systems (AWSs) [PDF] are treated under the laws of war.
True, we may eventually need more than one definition (just as “goodwill” means different things in different contexts). But we have to start somewhere so, in the absence of a regulatory definition at the moment, let’s get the ball rolling.
http://theconversation.com/why-we-need-a-legal-definition-of-artificial-intelligence-46796
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Friday September 04 2015, @02:55AM
humans are crap at alot of things. We desperately need self-driving cars, we already have mostly-self-flying planes.
AI will just remove the idiot.
However... We still need pilots (when planes domatrange things)
So.. Self-referential definition: true AI will exist whenit performs better than a human pilot when things go wrong.
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Gravis on Friday September 04 2015, @09:28AM
true AI will exist whenit performs better than a human pilot when things go wrong.
i disagree. the majority of plane crashes are actually due to pilot error.
"You shouldn’t be afraid of the plane, you should be afraid of the human element." -- Kyle Bailey, Aviation safety analyst, pilot and FAA Safety Team representative