Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday September 04 2015, @09:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-silent-vroom dept.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has announced that his company's "mass market sedan", the Model 3, can be pre-ordered in March 2016 for $35,000. The cars will not be available until 2017 at the earliest. From CNBC:

What's taking so long, you ask? Right now, the batteries that would power the Model 3 would cost about as much as the car is slated to. Tesla is building an enormous lithium-ion battery manufacturing facility in Nevada to make its own batteries for far less money — the "Gigafactory" mentioned in Musk's tweet.

Not much more can be revealed about the Model 3 except that, as Musk mentioned cryptically during a Q&A session on Reddit, "It won't look like other cars." What does that mean, exactly? We'll find out in March.

In the meantime, you can order yourself a new Model X — if you have the cash. The entry level model will cost around $5,000 more than a Model S with the same options, Musk wrote in yet another tweet — though you can easily spend well into the six figure range for the "Signature" high-end series.

Tesla customers will begin receiving their Model X "all-electric SUVs" beginning on Sept. 29.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quacking duck on Friday September 04 2015, @04:16PM

    by quacking duck (1395) on Friday September 04 2015, @04:16PM (#232309)

    single reason the Model S has a hood and a boot hatch is to appeal to conservative car buyers

    Well, you *do* need some cargo space, so either the hood or trunk has to remain in some form. And while Musk did say it'd be way different, in the very same sentence he also said "in a way that's really useful and just doesn't feel like a weird-mobile."

    So something like a golf-cart like the Google driverless car prototype is out, and maybe the Smart Car too, because although it's fine as a runabout, it doesn't fit the profile of a "really useful" multipurpose car.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Rich on Friday September 04 2015, @04:36PM

    by Rich (945) on Friday September 04 2015, @04:36PM (#232321) Journal

    Of course I thought the 2,20 m over the old Smart would be used for useful things. Like a lounge, or a massive cargo area. The Smart was just used to point out how far forward the driver can be moved without feeling cramped. Likewise, I didn't mean that there should be no access to the "trunk". It's just that a "cargo door" is more useful than a little boot flap. Cf. certain Audi S6 sold as estate only.

    Also, in Limousine territory, the Renault Avantime absolutely beats all metrics for usefulness when compared to similar sized cars. It's just that its shape did not appeal to buyers, so it flopped. Tesla might get away with it when they convince the general public that electric cars are not only hip, but have to look like that. Be there or be square. A bit like with acceptance and desirability of their large centre-console screen.