Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Friday September 04 2015, @12:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the stung dept.

According to the Washington Post all federal law enforcement agencies will need to get a warrant before using a Stingray. (Actual Policy Statement).

The Justice Department unveiled a policy Thursday that will require its law enforcement agencies to obtain a warrant to deploy cellphone-tracking devices in criminal investigations and inform judges when they plan to use them.

The department's new policy, announced by Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates, should increase transparency around the use of the controversial technology by the FBI and other Justice Department agencies.

... The new policy waives the warrant requirement for exigent circumstances. These include the need to protect human life "or avert serious injury," prevent the imminent destruction of evidence, the hot pursuit of a fleeing felon, or the prevention of escape by a convicted fugitive from justice.

The FBI had imposed their own internal warrant requirement back in April.

But the policy does not apply to State, and Local agencies that have been given Stingrays with instructions to keep them secret, even to the extent of dismissing charges rather than admit some evidence was gathered by questionable legal means.

So will ill gotten information now flow in reverse, from local to federal authorities? Will the Feds start practicing "Parallel Construction" using, but hiding, the information supplied by local police?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 04 2015, @01:46PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 04 2015, @01:46PM (#232237) Journal

    Lemme RTFA and I'll probably have something more to say . . . .

    TFA looks pretty good - not great, but pretty good. The link to the actual policy statement won't load for me. I suppose that it is hosted someplace that I have blocked.

    Ehh - paywalls, sites that don't load, I guess I'm not reading the actual policy today. I'm just happy that SOMEONE is finally seeing some sense.

    You can be pretty sure that some of the states will address this same issue, and pass the same requirements. Some other states won't. And, eventually, someone is going to push the issue up to the Supreme Court.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2