Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday September 07 2015, @06:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the public-money-for-private-profit dept.

Common Dreams reports

The Seattle Times reports that

The ruling--believed to be one of the first of its kind in the country--overturns the law [I-1240] voters narrowly approved in 2012 allowing publicly funded, but privately operated, schools.

Teacher and author Mercedes Schneider offers more on the Act:

As is true of charter schools nationwide, the charters in Washington State (up to the current ruling) were eligible for public funding diverted from traditional public schools. Charter schools were approved via a November 2012 ballot initiative (I-1240, the Charter Schools Act) in which charters were declared to be "common schools" despite their not being subject to local control and local accountability. And also like America's charters in general, Washington's charters are not under the authority of elected school boards.

Thus, Washington voters had approved to give public money to private entities--a one-way street that provided no means for such funds to overseen by the public.

[...] The new ruling (pdf)[1] states that charters, "devoid of local control from their inception to their daily operation", cannot be classified as "common schools," nor have "access to restricted common school funding."

[...] "The Supreme Court has affirmed what we've said all along--charter schools steal money from our existing classrooms, and voters have no say in how these charter schools spend taxpayer funding," said Kim Mead, president of the [Washington Education Association], in a statement.

"Instead of diverting taxpayer dollars to unaccountable charter schools, it's time for the Legislature to fully fund K-12 public schools so that all of Washington's children get the quality education the Constitution guarantees them," Mead continued.

The Associated Press reports that the state had one charter school last year, and eight more have opened in the past few weeks.

I pity Ms. Schneider's students if she routinely starts sentences with conjunctions--especially consecutive, redundant conjunctions.

[1] I had trouble with the connection.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @04:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @04:11PM (#233322)

    So much wrong here. Not sure if the unions are the biggest lobbiest anymore. I'm pretty sure industry has far surpassed them. The unions if anything are weakening here as elsewhere. I urge people to look at the financing of I-1240; the initiative that put charter schools in the state. Heavy funding (something like 10:1) by gates, broad, and the Wallmart clan. over the unions. We were bombarded by advertising by only one side. The union can only lobby with money contributed separately from union dues. Not the ogres that people make them out to be. Pretty toothless at the end of the day.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @04:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @04:55PM (#233340)

    The teacher's union is, as of recent figures, the biggest single lobbying group in Washington. These are public figures, go check them out yourself. I see no reason to expect that this has changed in 2015, but I guess it's possible. You'll want to get the numbers from the public disclosure commission - they have a website and everything.

    Alternatively, if you're lazy, you can just google for "news washington olympia biggest lobby teachers" and find lots of news stories.

    You're wrong about the dues thing - the terms of the Washington State Supreme Court's judgement on the topic of agency fees and freedom of speech issues simply stipulated that agency fees can't be used for political purposes, but that all other funds may - thus basically freeing the unions to pay administrative costs from agency fees, and do anything else with all the rest. Again, the ruling is public record.

    You need in this context to distinguish lobbying from other political spending as well. These are different numbers. Advertising for an initiative is not lobbying, and they do plenty of both.

    I'm not saying the unions are ogres. I'm not saying they shouldn't exist. I'm not even saying that they shouldn't lobby. I'm saying that as a group they are greatly threatened by alternatives and have done everything in their power to restrict those alternatives at every turn. Charter schools? In the ballots and courts, check. Home schooling? They tried to stamp it out and finally managed to restrict it massively, check. Private schools? They couldn't outlaw those, but paradoxically their hostility massively increased the independence of the private schools because now they owe the unions absolutely nothing. The same goes for religious schools, who are basically private schools with organised backing.

    And to what end? They have ringfenced financing, a large captive audience, they have mostly lapdog school boards, you would think that the quality of education would be absolutely second to none, you'd think that Washington would utterly crush Finland, Singapore and all those other famously successful countries.

    But no. The education available in Washington's public schools is mediocre, and when measured against the expenses, an incredibly expensive mediocrity at that.

    And the teachers' unions prescription? More teachers, more money, fewer people in alternative education. That at least hasn't changed in the last decade or more that I've been watching this issue.

  • (Score: 2) by albert on Monday September 07 2015, @05:31PM

    by albert (276) on Monday September 07 2015, @05:31PM (#233356)

    Gates is not Microsoft. The Walmart clan (Sam's now-elderly kids) is not Walmart.