SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the the-GPL-is-open-to-interpretation dept.
Grsecurity® is an extensive security enhancement to the Linux kernel that defends against a wide range of security threats through intelligent access control, memory corruption-based exploit prevention, and a host of other system hardening that generally require no configuration. It has been actively developed and maintained for the past 14 years. Commercial support for grsecurity is available through Open Source Security, Inc.
In a big red block at the top of their home page is the following warning:
Important Notice Regarding Public Availability of Stable Patches
Due to continued violations by several companies in the embedded industry of grsecurity®'s trademark and registered copyrights, effective September 9th 2015 stable patches of grsecurity will be permanently unavailable to the general public. For more information, read the full announcement.
And I thought GRSecurity was based on the GPL'd work called "Linux". Guess I was wrong.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @09:41AM
Therefore, two weeks from now, we will cease the public dissemination of the stable series and will make it available to sponsors only.
The GPL does NOT EVER guarantee you free shit for free, which is what you seem to want "because Linux."
But the GPL does promise that you can do what you like with it, without any restriction other than preserving GPL terms. So, it only takes one person to subscribe to their "improvements", and publish them for everyone to use.
Personally, I' take the view that if their "improvements" to the kernel were uncontroversially beneficial, they would have been absorbed into mainstream code already, so I'm not intending to use them.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @09:52AM
But the GPL does promise that you can do what you like with it, without any restriction other than preserving GPL terms. So, it only takes one person to subscribe to their "improvements", and publish them for everyone to use.
That's why the market value of Free Software is $0.00 and Linux users are smelly freetard neckbeards who beg on street corners.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @10:51PM
beggars in IN make over 100k, AND they have neckbeards!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 07 2015, @11:13PM
>That's why the market value of Free Software is $0.00 and Linux users are smelly freetard neckbeards who beg on street corners.
They make a deal with a devil and then wish not to give him his due when it turns out that the deal was exactly as stated:
We give you something for "free", you give us the best years of your lives.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by ThePhilips on Monday September 07 2015, @10:03AM
But the GPL does promise that you can do what you like with it, without any restriction other than preserving GPL terms. So, it only takes one person to subscribe to their "improvements", and publish them for everyone to use.
Yes.
But recall the whole RHEL vs CentOS debacle.
RedHat sells lots of of GPLed components to the RHEL customers. And even though they are GPLed, you would rarely, if ever, find them for free download on the net.
Personally, I' take the view that if their "improvements" to the kernel were uncontroversially beneficial, they would have been absorbed into mainstream code already, so I'm not intending to use them.
That discussion is more than a decade old.
GrSecurity patches (and similar) are very intrusive, and generally trade performance for a promise of higher security. It's not just couple of places patched or a loadable module a-la AppArmor or SELinux. They patch and change lots of code, including the very low-level routines, making the kernel as a whole harder to develop and maintain.
OTOH, the security people also not very eager. The fame of merging it into the mainline would fade quickly. While by maintaining their own patchsets, they have something akin to a product, and an associated with it service to sell.