| Title | Fingerprint Analysis Could Finally Get Scientific, Thanks to a New Tool | |
| Date | Sunday May 20 2018, @05:39PM | |
| Author | mrpg | |
| Topic | ||
| from the if-mode>4-then-guilty dept. | ||
Submitted via IRC for Fnord666
[...] A landmark report published in 2009 by the National Academy of Sciences highlighted the lack of scientific foundation for fingerprint evidence, as well as other commonly used metrics in forensic science, like bite marks and bloodstain patterns. This isn't to say that fingerprints aren't useful in the justice system. But they aren't entirely reliable, and in the current practice of print analysis, there's no place to signal that uncertainty to an attorney, judge, or jury.
Using statistics and probabilities to help bolster fingerprint results and signal the weight of the evidence isn't a new idea, but this is the first time a tool has actually been put in the hands of fingerprint examiners. FRStat was developed by Henry Swofford, chief of the latent print branch at the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory at the Department of Defense. "We're the first lab in the United States to report fingerprint evidence using a statistical foundation," Swofford said.
[...] Adding a element of quantitative analysis to fingerprint identification is positive progress for forensic science, which struggles, overall, to live up to the "science" side of its name. Implementing the program, though, requires a significant culture change for a field that's remained largely the same for decades, if not a century—posing additional challenges for people like Swofford who pushing for progress.
Source: Fingerprint Analysis Could Finally Get Scientific, Thanks to a New Tool
| Links |
printed from SoylentNews, Fingerprint Analysis Could Finally Get Scientific, Thanks to a New Tool on 2024-04-24 03:56:40