Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Woods on Saturday May 10 2014, @02:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the my-favorite-acronym-that-sounds-like-Mario-asking-for-cleaning-supplies dept.

Cory Doctrow at bOing bOing brings us Congressmen ask ad companies to pretend SOPA is law, break anti-trust:

A murder of Congresscritters and Senators have told Internet ad-brokers that they expect them to behave as though SOPA passed into law (instead of suffering hideous, total defeat); they want the companies to establish a secret, unaccountable blacklist of "pirate" sites. The group comprises Congressmen Bob Goodlatte and Adam Schiff, and Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Orrin Hatch. This isn't just a terrible idea, it's also an obviously illegal antitrust violation.

He also links Mitch Stoltz from the Electronic Frontier Foundation Who points out this is a violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust law.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by SpockLogic on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:23AM

    by SpockLogic (2762) on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:23AM (#41463)

    Congressmen Bob Goodlatte and Adam Schiff, and Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Orrin Hatch should be in jail.

    --
    Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:48AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:48AM (#41470)

    This is just another reason to dislike America. I'm sorry (well, not really) but your politicians and law makers set the benchmark for how far other western countries push their lucky in many regards.

    Other western 'governments': "If they get away with it in America, why can't we?"

    You have long served as an oracle of sorts to the rest of the world. What happens in your financial markets generally hits the rest of the world eventually. We can predict many things worldwide based on what happens in your country.

    I for one look forward to eventually seeing wide-spread civil disobedient (Arab spring anyone?) over the pond. It will either make the rest of the western world pull it's socks up or signal the forth-coming liberation many of us have been waiting for for a long time.

    • (Score: 4, Informative) by Reziac on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:56AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Saturday May 10 2014, @03:56AM (#41471) Homepage

      Meanwhile in America, the usual excuse for lunacy is "This is how it's done in Europe."

      Fact is we both copy the worst of each other. :(

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by davester666 on Saturday May 10 2014, @05:31AM

        by davester666 (155) on Saturday May 10 2014, @05:31AM (#41503)

        Implemented via "free trade" deals. "The other side insisted on it, and it's just a minor thing so we went along with it."

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Fluffeh on Saturday May 10 2014, @09:04AM

        by Fluffeh (954) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 10 2014, @09:04AM (#41532) Journal

        It makes it easier for the politicians to do what they (and by they, I mean the people that buy them) want that way. They copy (and often extend just a little) what was done on the other side of the pond.

        • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Saturday May 10 2014, @12:34PM

          by Reziac (2489) on Saturday May 10 2014, @12:34PM (#41563) Homepage

          Yep, that's a good point.... Take advantage of the age-old fad of Exotic Foreigners. You can justify any sort of nonsense if only you can get your constituents to buy into "but they do it this way and it's so much better than how we do it".

          --
          And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
    • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:17AM

      by Nerdfest (80) on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:17AM (#41474)

      I think it's a lot closer than people realize. Because of the speed of communication these days everything is 'amplified' to a degree.

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Rune of Doom on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:35AM

      by Rune of Doom (1392) on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:35AM (#41481)

      It's long past being a matter of politics or which side you prefer. At least, for sane human beings it is. America's institutions are broken and dysfunctional, and it's pretty clear that they will never be fixed in any real sense. The only questions left are how long things can keep going before the whole thing comes apart (around 15 years is my best guess), how bad the crash will be (hopefully no worse than Orlov's mid-State Three), and how much damage will be done by the shockwaves around the world (not devastating, I hope/guess).

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday May 10 2014, @11:38AM

        You're too optimistic of the American people. I'd guess no less than 20 years and likely closer to 50. The state will not allow itself to collapse. It will bleed the people for life support first and we simply have not bred any generations of fighters to stand up to it since WWII. The closest we've come are the Gen-Xers and they're more cynical and nihilistic than angry. Whatever generation does finally stand up and say fuck this noise is going to have to be willing to bleed and die for their cause; the entrenched, corrupt power structure will not willingly or easily give up power.
        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Thesis on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:17AM

    by Thesis (524) on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:17AM (#41475)

    I'm not a violent individual, and despise violence overall. However, if someone were to string them up, as a lesson to others in such a position, I would not lift a finger to stop it. In fact, I would probably celebrate. The blatant corruption must be stopped somehow, and voting has thus far proven to not be the answer, as most Americans know.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by jelizondo on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:56AM

    by jelizondo (653) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 10 2014, @04:56AM (#41490) Journal

    Many people think that disregard for laws amongst the elite is recent, but that is nothing new. They believe the U.S. of A. was different from other countries. Read your history, it was this way in the time of the Greeks and the Romans and it was this way in the U.S. of A. from the very founding of the country.

    The big difference is that now the news travels around the world in minutes, and people tend to think things are getting worst. (Check the availability heuristic, Daniel Kahneman [wikipedia.org].)

    The way I see it, is either people will get off their couches and use this new-found power of the Internet to bring elected representatives to behave and a true and wonderfull democratic period will ensue or they will continue to watch TV and not give a damn, making the elite impervious to limited criticism.

    Now get off your couch and don't even think about hanging around my lawn!

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by hash14 on Saturday May 10 2014, @08:52AM

    by hash14 (1102) on Saturday May 10 2014, @08:52AM (#41531)

    There's no such thing as a law against legislative malpractice - but this is exactly what it would be: abusing your position as a legislator to push an agenda that has been overwhelmingly rejected is a criminal act and should be treated as such.

    The problem is that there is no repercussion for this behavior, just as there is no repercussion for patent trolls (including the corporate ones like Microsoft, IBM, Apple, etc.). Suggestions on how to fix it?

    Yes, yes, I know - the US Congress members actually are serving those they represent, it's just it's not the people who elect them, it's the ones who pay for them to get elected.