Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the [im]plausible-deniability dept.

Matthew Fisher reports that to support part of its claim to about 85 per cent of the South China Sea, Beijing is building artificial islands on tiny outcroppings, atolls and reefs in hotly disputed waters in the Spratly Archipelago.

Tons of sand, rocks, coral cuttings, and concrete are transforming miniscule Chinese-occupied outcroppings into sizable islands with harbors, large multi-story buildings, airstrips, and other government facilities. Adm. Harry Harris Jr., commander of the U.S. Navy’s Pacific fleet, dubbed Beijing’s island-building project in the South China Sea “a great wall of sand" and says China has created “over four square kilometers of artificial land mass,” adding there were serious questions about Beijing’s intentions. The scale of China's construction in the Spratly Islands is clear in new satellite images. "What's really stunning in these images, every time you see a new set of images come out, is just the speed and scale at which this work is occurring," says Mira Rapp-Hooper.

A spokeswoman for China’s Foreign Ministry insists the islands are being built to give ships a haven in the typhoon heavy region. “We are building shelters, aids for navigation, search and rescue as well as marine meteorological forecasting services, fishery services and other administrative services” for both China and its neighbors, the spokeswoman said, according to Reuters, though no one was buying that explanation.

Related Stories

Chinese Weaponry Spotted on Artificial Islands 16 comments

U.S. surveillance imagery has spotted weapons on artificial islands in the South China Sea:

The U.S. imagery detected two Chinese motorized artillery pieces on one of the artificial islands built by China about one month ago. While the artillery wouldn't pose a threat to U.S. planes or ships, U.S. officials said it could reach neighboring islands and that its presence was at odds with China's public statements that the reclaimed islands are mainly for civilian use.

"There is no military threat," a U.S. official told The Wall Street Journal on Thursday. "But it is about the symbolism."

While posing no military threat to the U.S., the motorized artillery was within range of an island claimed by Vietnam that Hanoi has armed with various weaponry for some time, the American officials said. Vietnamese officials didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

A Chinese Embassy spokesman in Washington wouldn't comment specifically on the weaponry, but said its development work within the Spratly Islands—known by the Chinese as the Nansha Islands—was primarily civilian.

China's first white paper on military strategy [single page], published on May 26th by the State Council Information Office, reveals that China is planning to project naval power beyond its offshore borders and focus on "open seas protection." Additional BBC reporting.


Original Submission

U.S. Spy Plane Deploys to Singapore Amid South China Sea Tensions 21 comments

A Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft is being deployed to Singapore amid growing tensions over territorial claims in the South China Sea:

The United States has deployed a P-8 Poseidon spy plane to Singapore for the first time. It is the latest in a series of US military actions seen as a response to China's increasingly assertive claims over territory in the South China Sea.

The US says it will also base a military reconnaissance plane at Singapore's Paya Lebar air base. US P-8s already operate from Japan and the Philippines, and surveillance flights have taken off from Malaysia. The P-8 was deployed on Monday, and will remain in Singapore until 14 December.

In addition to the P-8 deployment, the US says it will operate a military plane, either a P-8 Poseidon or a P-3 Orion, from Singapore for the foreseeable future, rotating planes on a quarterly basis. The US-Singapore agreement, announced after a meeting in Washington on Monday between US Defense Secretary Ash Carter and Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, also covers co-operation on counter-terrorism, fighting piracy, and disaster relief.

Previously: China's Island Factory
China Builds Artificial Islands in South China Sea
Chinese Weaponry Spotted on Artificial Islands


Original Submission

China's South China Sea Claims Rejected By "Binding" but Unenforceable Tribunal Ruling 24 comments

China is a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, but that won't stop it from ignoring this ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague:

An international tribunal in The Hague delivered a sweeping rebuke on Tuesday of China's behavior in the South China Sea, including the construction of artificial islands, and found that its expansive claim to sovereignty over the waters had no legal basis.

The tribunal also said that Beijing had violated international law by causing "severe harm to the coral reef environment" and by failing to prevent Chinese fishermen from harvesting endangered sea turtles and other species "on a substantial scale."

The landmark case, brought by the Philippines, was seen as an important crossroads in China's rise as a global power. It is the first time the Chinese government has been summoned before the international justice system, and the decision against it could provide leverage to other neighboring countries that have their own disputes with Beijing in the South China Sea.

"It's an overwhelming victory. We won on every significant point," said the Philippines' chief counsel in the case, Paul S. Reichler. "This is a remarkable victory for the Philippines."

But while the decision is legally binding, there is no mechanism for enforcing it, and China, which refused to participate in the tribunal's proceedings, reiterated on Tuesday that it would not abide by it. "The award is invalid and has no binding force," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "China does not accept or recognize it."

Now the U.S. can feel properly justified as it continues to do nothing. This news is also reported at Time , Reuters, The Guardian , and The Washington Post . Full response at Xinhua.

Previously: China Builds Artificial Islands in South China Sea
U.S. Spy Plane Deploys to Singapore Amid South China Sea Tensions
China Places Surface-to-Air Missile Launchers on Disputed Island
U.S. Admiral Warns of New Activity Near Reef Seized by China
The West Protests as the Chinese Military Continues to Operate in the South China Sea


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:46AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:46AM (#169229)

    China has developed technology to thwart rising sea levels?

    • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:17AM

      by davester666 (155) on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:17AM (#169239)

      Yeah, it's not a secret. Just pile more dirt on your land. This trick works everywhere.

      I expect the US gov't to pay for this to happen along both coasts "to preserve our way of life".

      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:21AM (#169242)

        "to preserve our way of life".

        Waterboarding and warmongering?

      • (Score: 2) by deimios on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:47AM

        by deimios (201) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:47AM (#169247) Journal

        And since we know that China is good at it, why not pay them to do the same in the US?

        • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:49AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:49AM (#169248)

          Sure, we already pay Mexicans to steal our dirt, why not pay Chinese to put it back.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:56AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:56AM (#169230)

    Never ever trust China. The Internet sayed so! Uhuhuhuhuhuh.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:59AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @03:59AM (#169231)

    An't no Mericans ordered new islands in south sea! Do what Mer'ca says or else we drone the shit otta ya!

  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by GungnirSniper on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:08AM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:08AM (#169249) Journal

    There's a good number of reasons China is doing this now:

    • China is now strong enough to do so, economically and navally.
    • America, wrapped up in the Middle East, does not have the will to stop them.
    • China's energy needs are growing rapidly as cities are popping up at a dramatic pace.
    • Should China want to make a deeper threat to Taiwan, these islands will be strategic.
    • Fisheries may grow a bit around them, helping to feed China, especially if they end their one-child policy.

    Aside from the obvious costs I don't see any downside. Their neighbors aren't going to stop them.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @07:55AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @07:55AM (#169276)

      Aside from the obvious costs I don't see any downside. Their neighbors aren't going to stop them.

      And that's exactly why you see the US govt bitching about it. A stronger China is the last thing they want to see.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @08:53PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @08:53PM (#169408)

        It should be the last thing any westerner wants to see. If not, they've drank the cool-aid of "anything an enemy of America is good".

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by zocalo on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:19PM

      by zocalo (302) on Sunday April 12 2015, @04:19PM (#169348)
      You left off "massive natural resources suspected/proven to exist below the South China Sea", but otherwise you pretty much nailed it I think. In combination with China's growing ability to exploit those resources and the internationally accepted implications that applying territorial limits to these artificial and enhanced islands I think fishereries are probably not exactly the primary benefit they are thinking about here given how badly they want natural resources at the moment. Sell any excess to their trading partners and thing might even work out that they turn a huge financial profit from their current investments. Strategically this is a good move for China's future, and the overall timing and disposition of those who might want to try and oppose the idea is just about perfect for them.

      Not sure if you were aware or not, but the one child policy is now in the process being consigned to history. It didn't attract much fanfare in the West at the time but it was relaxed in November 2013 to a two child policy provided one of the parents is a single child, although the story I did see recently on this was that the people are having a hard time getting used to the idea and are voluntarily sticking to the policy.
      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
      • (Score: 2) by arslan on Sunday April 12 2015, @11:12PM

        by arslan (3462) on Sunday April 12 2015, @11:12PM (#169457)

        Yea, rumor has it that there's gas and oil in the South China Sea bed..

  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:08AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:08AM (#169254)

    A spokeswoman for China’s Foreign Ministry insists the islands are being built to give ships a haven in the typhoon heavy region.

    this is obvious bullshit, just like how they claimed they were the victims in the github attack when lo and behold their operation was exposed. sadly, it remind me of the kind of denials you get from parts of the US government.
     
    you can't trust governments to tell the truth. :(

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:09AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:09AM (#169255)

    I watched a documentary either on TV or Netflix over a year ago about exactly this (China building artificial islands to exert land claims in South China Sea).
    I only did a quick Google just now and they have been doing this since at least early 2013 if not sooner. So the "China doing this now..." is about two years late.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:55AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @06:55AM (#169268)

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32126840 [bbc.com]

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-32234448 [bbc.com]

      The US is concerned China is using "sheer size and muscle" to strong-arm smaller nations in the row over the South China Sea, Barack Obama says.

      The US president's comments came amid heightened focus on Beijing's construction of artificial islands in disputed areas of the sea.
      On Thursday a US think tank released images showing land reclamation work on a reef claimed by the Philippines.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:57PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:57PM (#169333)

        LOL its the pot calling the kettle black.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:12PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:12PM (#169325)
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by inertnet on Sunday April 12 2015, @11:56AM

    by inertnet (4071) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 12 2015, @11:56AM (#169292) Journal

    Chinese children learn a Chinese version of the world map where all the disputed territories are shown as Chinese, so good luck trying to change the world view of the whole Chinese population.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by caffeinated bacon on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:31PM

      by caffeinated bacon (4151) on Sunday April 12 2015, @02:31PM (#169327)

      That's what the rest of the world thinks about American Science textbooks, and Japanese History textbooks also.

  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:25PM

    by Bot (3902) on Sunday April 12 2015, @05:25PM (#169360) Journal

    Cut them some slack! they probably don't have enough land in that country.

    --
    Account abandoned.