Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the core-business dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

For years Google Maps has offered Street View, giving viewers a street level glimpse into far away destinations.

Word on the street (no pun intended!) is that Apple is sending out vehicles to photograph various locales in Ireland, UK, and the United States, with the imagery being used in their Apple Maps application.

In the US, Apple will be driving around parts of Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Texas, Utah, and Washington state.

In Ireland, Apple will map the greater Dublin area. For the UK, street mapping will be done in Essex, Greater London, Kent, and Birmingham.

Apple's page states:

[...] Apple is driving vehicles around the world to collect data which will be used to improve Apple Maps. Some of this data will be published in future Apple Maps updates.

[...] We are committed to protecting your privacy while collecting this data. For example, we will blur faces and license plates on collected images prior to publication.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:16AM

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:16AM (#195642) Homepage Journal

    Google does it. If Apple does it it's doxxen? Anyone can drive down am street and record it. Its called the 1st amendment. This is clickbait non news.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:42AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:42AM (#195649) Journal
      • (Score: 1) by Gertlex on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:15AM

        by Gertlex (3966) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:15AM (#195657)

        The rumor mill ignored anyone noting that the equipment on the vans was commonplace mapping and road quality equipment. An autonomous car has no need for a large set of laser scanners specifically for down-imagery of pavement.

        They're probably collecting the data for future autonomous purposes, though. In the past few years, car companies developing autonomous systems have been working with existing companies that do pavement scanning/mapping, etc.

        (Had a previous job at a company doing this stuff; good reminder of how many facts tech articles are completely unaware of.)

    • (Score: 2) by tibman on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:50AM

      by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:50AM (#195650)

      Neither the articles nor the summary insinuated that apple was trying to dox anyone. It also appears to be tech news. The van doesn't look like something you would associate with Apple. The camera system does look really apple though.

      Don't forget that google did get in a lot of trouble for just driving down the street and recording.

      --
      SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:41AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:41AM (#195664)

      If Apple does it it's doxxen?

      Where do you see that? I'm an Apple fan, but I think you're overreacting to this story. And saying "Its called the 1st amendment" when places not in the U.S. are in the discussion is another indicator you've not thought it through.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by janrinok on Saturday June 13 2015, @07:15AM

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 13 2015, @07:15AM (#195687) Journal

      The USA has the first amendment - other countries (in this case the UK and Ireland) have their own laws and are not obligated to comply with any US versions. However, it is irrelevant. Firstly, nobody has suggested that the activity is illegal in any way. I'm not quite sure why you thought that someone had suggested such a thing.

      Secondly, the point of the article is that there was earlier speculation that the work was related to Apples autonomous vehicles. This reports indicates that the primary function is the collection of data to improve Apple Maps. However, there may still be useful data collected in addition to mapping that will be of interest to future autonomous vehicles.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Whoever on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:29AM

    by Whoever (4524) on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:29AM (#195645) Journal

    We would not want Google to get complacent with Maps. The only problem might be if Google decides that their support for hipsters is not good enough and un-improves Maps (although, this process may have already started).

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:40AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday June 13 2015, @04:40AM (#195648) Journal

      The rumor mill thought it might be Apple testing out autonomous cars.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @09:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @09:15AM (#195706)

      this process may have already started

      this process has definitely started

      it started when they removed wikipedia links from google maps, and the new version of maps user interface is total garbage

      • (Score: 2) by Appalbarry on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:09PM

        by Appalbarry (66) on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:09PM (#195828) Journal

        What? You're saying that removing the "Print" function is not an improvement?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 13 2015, @05:57AM (#195666)

    You blur the fucking faces DURING collection, NOT prior to publication.
    But no, you have another agenda don't you?

    • (Score: 2) by BasilBrush on Saturday June 13 2015, @09:17PM

      by BasilBrush (3994) on Saturday June 13 2015, @09:17PM (#195891)

      That's a stupid idea. If the algorithm makes a mistake, seeing an inanimate object or a billboard as a face, then there will be an improperly blurred area on a picture, and it's not practical to go back and retake the picture. Keeping the originals and blurring before publication means that when errors are spotted, they can be fixed.

      --
      Hurrah! Quoting works now!
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Saturday June 13 2015, @10:27AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Saturday June 13 2015, @10:27AM (#195733) Homepage Journal

    that was quite cool.

    The driver had this shit-eating grin on his face when he drove by. To my surprise the camera looked homemade; there were eight cameras on a small tower on the car's roof. That tower was constructed quite crudely of plywood.

    I haven't been able to dig up the photos with me in them. I don't know whether those particular photos were never selected for use or were simply replaced by new photos of the same place taken at a later time.

    There is a way to look up street view from the past but I've never had the headspace to deal with it. It was at the Starbucks on Snell Avenue, South of Blossom Hill Road in San Jose, I think it was in the late spring of 2010. Do yer worst.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]