Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday January 28 2016, @11:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the putting-it-on-the-fast-track dept.

It's a race befitting the goal of moving passengers and cargo at the speed of sound: Three Southern California companies are building separate test tracks to see how well the "hyperloop" transportation concept works in the real world.

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk breathed life into the hyperloop in 2013, when he proposed a network of elevated tubes to transport specially designed capsules over long distances. Top speed: about 750 mph.

Though momentum to build a hyperloop has been growing since, the concept dates back decades.

Capsules would float on a thin cushion of air and use magnetic attraction[sic] and solar power to zoom through nearly airless tubes. With little wind resistance, they could make the 400-mile trip between Los Angeles and San Francisco in about a half-hour. Musk has said that while he does not plan to develop the hyperloop commercially, he wants to accelerate its development.

On Tuesday, his SpaceX rocket launching firm said global infrastructure firm AECOM would build a one-mile track at SpaceX headquarters near Los Angeles International Airport.

If all goes well, by summer's end, the track will host prototype capsules that emerge from a design competition this weekend at Texas A&M University. The prototype pods would be half the size of the system that Musk envisioned and would not carry people.


Original Submission

Related Stories

MIT Design Wins SpaceX Hyperloop Design Competition 11 comments

A Massachusetts Institute of Technology team has placed first in the design phase of SpaceX's Hyperloop competition. 115 teams submitted designs, and 22 teams will be able to test their designs on a 1.5 km test track during the summer:

Designs for passenger pods that could travel through airless tubes have been revealed by a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Hyperloop is a conceptual transport system in which passenger pods could be fired through vacuum tubes at more than 600mph (1,000km/h). The MIT team came first in a SpaceX competition to design pods that could be tested in a prototype tube. The team will now have the opportunity to build and test its design in the US.

Elon Musk - the entrepreneur behind companies such as Paypal, SpaceX, and Tesla Motors - announced his vision for a Hyperloop transport system in August 2013. Although SpaceX is not developing its own commercial Hyperloop, the company says it wants to "accelerate development" of the idea and is building a mile-long test track in California. The winning entries in the company's design competition will now have the opportunity to test them in full-scale tubes over the summer.

Popular Science, Space.com.

Previously:
SpaceX will hold a Hyperloop Pod Competition in 2016
Three Tracks Planned to Test 'Hyperloop' Transportation Idea


Original Submission

Hyperloop Could Debut in Europe Instead of California 41 comments

Hyperloop, the transportation technology associated with Elon Musk, could be coming to Europe instead of California:

The Hyperloop could easily become the next big thing after bullet trains. It's a tube-based transportation system, in which pressurized passenger pods are accelerated through reduced-pressure tubes, which enables them to develop speeds as high as 760 miles per hour.

[...] While resolving technical issues was just a matter of time, crossing the red-tape sea in the U.S. forced one of the companies competing to make the Hyperloop a reality — Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, or HTT — to consider building their futuristic transportation pod in Slovakia, at the center of Europe. Just a few weeks ago, HTT CEO Dirk Ahlborn announced that his company has reached an agreement with the Slovakian government. Their plan is to establish the Hyperloop transportation route from Vienna to Bratislava, Slovakia, and from Bratislava to Budapest, Hungary. It normally takes about eight hours to travel from Košice, Slovakia, to Vienna to Budapest. But it's only 43 minutes with the Hyperloop.

[...] In an interview with Vice, HTT Chief Operating Officer Bibop G. Gresta said the initial feasibility study showed that the Hyperloop pod could transport up to 10 million people a year [in California]. The biggest challenges, he said, are politics and regulation.

Previously: The Race to Create Elon Musk's Hyperloop Heats Up
Three Tracks Planned to Test 'Hyperloop' Transportation Idea
MIT Design Wins SpaceX Hyperloop Design Competition


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @12:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @12:25AM (#296174)

    I know a guy that help Musk lobby CA for the Hyperloop. Cool stuff.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Friday January 29 2016, @12:38AM

      by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday January 29 2016, @12:38AM (#296181) Journal

      http://iveybusinessreview.ca/blogs/mzawalskyhba2014/2014/01/15/hyperloop-a-100-billion-boondoggle/ [iveybusinessreview.ca]
      http://iveybusinessreview.ca/blogs/mzawalskyhba2014/2014/07/16/a-20-dollar-hyperloop-ticket/ [iveybusinessreview.ca]

      I doubt hyperloop will be able to conquer California, but it would be neat to see it happen.

      I'm glad that Musk is investing a little money to make a working prototype rather than dumping the idea into the public domain and backing off as it first appeared.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Friday January 29 2016, @02:05AM

        by Gravis (4596) on Friday January 29 2016, @02:05AM (#296203)

        I'm glad that Musk is investing a little money to make a working prototype rather than dumping the idea into the public domain and backing off as it first appeared.

        i'm not because it seems like a money pit and a waste of time! the other projects have pitfalls but this project has nothing but pitfalls!

        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Friday January 29 2016, @02:29AM

          by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday January 29 2016, @02:29AM (#296209) Journal

          Elon Musk is all about pitfalls.

          If hyperloop can beat high speed rail, test tracks are a good start towards finding that out and dealing with the pitfalls. And California's money won't be blown on this test track.

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
          • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Friday January 29 2016, @02:49AM

            by Gravis (4596) on Friday January 29 2016, @02:49AM (#296215)

            the pitfalls i'm talking about are environmental study requirements for installing things anywhere. however, it might be a good idea for places like... Mars.

            • (Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Friday January 29 2016, @03:13AM

              by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday January 29 2016, @03:13AM (#296222) Journal

              http://news.thomasnet.com/IMT/2013/09/03/is-the-hyperloop-the-greenest-track-for-rapid-transit [thomasnet.com]

              Hyperloop employs clean technologies and some aspects of the design seem to offer energy savings and a relatively small environmental footprint. The transit line would be built mostly on the median of the I-5 highway, so little additional land is required. The steel tubes, two of them for two-way travel, are set on 20-foot concrete pylons placed every 100 feet. This elevated configuration avoids the environmental disruption involved with underground construction. Solar arrays cover the tops of the tubes to power the system. Individual capsules are powered by batteries.

              --
              [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @04:06AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @04:06AM (#296232)

                Solar? Batteries? Fuck that expensive shit, use the grid to power the system and Gasoline engines to power the capsules.

              • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Friday January 29 2016, @10:36AM

                by Nuke (3162) on Friday January 29 2016, @10:36AM (#296328)

                a relatively small environmental footprint...... The steel tubes ... are set on 20-foot concrete pylons placed every 100 feet. This elevated configuration avoids the environmental disruption involved with underground construction.

                Depends on what you mean by "envirionmental disruption". If you only ever walk around looking at your feet (as introspective geeks are reputed to do), you will only notice the hyperloop if you bump into a pylon. However, if you look up sometimes, these things will be eysores of the first order.

                avoids the environmental disruption involved with underground construction

                Eh ?? Must have taken a lot of nerve to spin that somersault. In the UK here, underground tunnelling is used as a way of minimising disruption, not just constructional, but environmental and all other forms of it as well. The only disruption is around constructional access points which can be miles apart, and such tunnelling is now routine. OTOH, constructing an overground hyperloop, with a pylon every 100 ft, is going to be a lot of disruption during construction.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @03:12AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @03:12AM (#296221)

          I'm glad that Musk is investing a little money to make a working prototype rather than dumping the idea into the public domain and backing off as it first appeared.

          i'm not because it seems like a money pit and a waste of time! the other projects have pitfalls but this project has nothing but pitfalls!

          Exactly. Because public transit is for poor people, not those who can afford mighty ICE vehicles. Those are the future! And with gas being so cheap now, you should go out and buy one with the biggest engine you can find and remove the catalytic converter -- it just makes things worse.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by bob_super on Friday January 29 2016, @01:09AM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday January 29 2016, @01:09AM (#296193)

    see title. s/jetpacks/hyperloop_tubes

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday January 29 2016, @02:32AM

      by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday January 29 2016, @02:32AM (#296210) Journal

      Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @07:19AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @07:19AM (#296279)

      Yes, but strapping a jet-powered flying wing to your back and leaping from a perfectly good airplane is safer than any other method of transportation.

      There have been zero fatalities thus far.

    • (Score: 2) by mojo chan on Friday January 29 2016, @11:07AM

      by mojo chan (266) on Friday January 29 2016, @11:07AM (#296334)

      This thing isn't actually that fast anyway. The Japanese maglev is expected to hit these speeds eventually, and to be honest that's fast enough for most purposes. As fast as a passenger jet, but much more comfortable, quiet, easy to use, cheaper and greener.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @10:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2016, @10:34PM (#296731)

    Please justify your use of sic THIS time. "attraction" is spelled correctly. I cannot figure out what word that I might confuse it with because it might be a transcription typo. In fact, I would be highly impressed if you managed to change the word outright with a copy-paste. In fact, when it is an obvious copy and paste, there is absolutely NO reason to insert your own sics.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 05 2016, @08:20PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 05 2016, @08:20PM (#299593)

      Ah, there's always a sick/sic guy somewhere.

      At least some of the maglev concepts use magnetic repulsion, or perhaps some combination of attraction and repulsion -- is that what you are nit picking about?