Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 13 2016, @03:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the company-or-a-crowd? dept.

A study by Newcastle University researchers has found that three-person in vitro fertilization is safe (does not adversely affect embryos) and can be routinely performed. Three-person IVF allows the transfer of donor mitochondria into an embryo in order to prevent mitochondrial disease:

Published today in the journal Nature, scientists at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Disease at Newcastle University report the first in-depth analysis of human embryos created using a new technique designed to reduce the risk of mothers passing on mitochondrial disease to their children, which is debilitating and often life-limiting.

[...] Today researchers, in a study involving over 500 eggs from 64 donor women, publish results that indicate that the new procedure does not adversely affect human development and will greatly reduce the level of faulty mitochondria in the embryo. Their results suggest that the technique will lead to normal pregnancies whilst also reducing the risk of babies having mitochondrial disease. The results of this study will be considered by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's (HFEA) Expert Scientific Panel. The HFEA will ultimately decide whether to issue the first licence to a clinic. A licensed clinic would allow couples affected by mitochondrial disease to have the choice of whether to use pronuclear transfer to try and have healthy children.

Also at the BBC. You can fill out this form to donate eggs or sperm to the Newcastle Fertility Centre at Life.

Towards clinical application of pronuclear transfer to prevent mitochondrial DNA disease (DOI: 10.1038/nature18303)

Previously: UK Approves Three-Person IVF Babies
U.S. Panel Gives Tentative Endorsement to Three-Person IVF


Original Submission

Related Stories

UK Approves Three-Person IVF Babies 23 comments

The BBC reports that three-person IVF will soon be legal in the United Kingdom. The procedure involves replacing mitochondrial DNA in an embryo from that of a second woman in order to eliminate deadly mitochondrial genetic disorders. Alana Saarinen was successfully conceived in the U.S. using the procedure back in 2000, but the FDA banned ooplasm transfer in 2001.

The UK has now become the first country to approve laws to allow the creation of babies from three people. The modified version of IVF has passed its final legislative obstacle after being approved by the House of Lords. The fertility regulator will now decide how to license the procedure to prevent babies inheriting deadly genetic diseases. The first baby could be born as early as 2016. A large majority of MPs in the House of Commons approved "three-person babies" earlier this month. The House of Lords tonight rejected an attempt to block the plan by a majority of 232. Estimates suggest 150 couples would be suitable to have babies through the technique each year.

Additional coverage at Wired UK and The Guardian.

Related: UK Parliament Gives Three-"Source" IVF the Go-Ahead.

U.S. Panel Gives Tentative Endorsement to Three-Person IVF 12 comments

A National Academy of Medicine (formerly known as the Institute of Medicine) committee has given conditional backing to the use of mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRT). Three-person in vitro fertilisation was approved and legalized in the United Kingdom last year, but has been banned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 2001, despite having been used to conceive a patient back in 2000. Mitochondrial replacement is intended to allow a couple to conceive a child, but with healthy mitochondria inserted into the embryo from a female donor:

Would it be ethical for scientists to try to create babies that have genetic material from three different people? An influential panel of experts has concluded the answer could be yes. The 12-member panel, assembled by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, released a 164-page report Wednesday outlining a plan for how scientists could ethically pursue the controversial research. "The committee concludes that it is ethically permissible" to conduct such experiments, the report says, but then goes on to detail a long list of conditions that would have to be met first.

For example, scientists would have to perform extensive preliminary research in the laboratory and with animals to try make sure it is safe. And then researchers should initially try to make only male babies, because they would be incapable of passing their unusual amalgamation of DNA on to future generations. "Minimizing risk to future children should be of highest priority," the committee writes.

The report was requested by the Food and Drug Administration in response to applications by two groups of scientists in New York and Oregon to conduct the experiments. Their goal is to help women have healthy babies even though they come from families plagued by [mitochondrial] genetic disorders.

The PDF of the report, "Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Ethical, Social, and Policy Considerations" (DOI: 10.17226/21871) is 8.1 MB and can be downloaded "as guest" with no email confirmation.


Original Submission

University of Missouri Researchers Create Embryos with Both Maternal and Paternal Mitochondrial DNA 12 comments

Scientists have recreated heteroplasmy by producing embryos with both maternal and paternal mitochondrial DNA:

A new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) from the University of Missouri has succeeded in creating embryos with "heteroplasmy," or the presence of both maternal and paternal mitochondrial DNA. This new innovation will allow scientists to study treatments for mitochondrial diseases in humans as well as the significance of mitochondrial inheritance for livestock.

When parents pass along their genes to their children, most of the DNA from the mother and father is evenly divided. However, children only receive one type of [mitochondrial DNA] from their mothers, while the fathers' mitochondrial DNA is naturally removed from the embryos. Peter Sutovsky, a professor of reproductive physiology at Mizzou and lead author Won-Hee Song, a doctoral candidate in the Mizzou College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, have found a way to prevent this paternal mitochondrial DNA removal process in pig embryos, thus creating embryos with "heteroplasmy."

"As many as 4,000 children are born in the U.S. every year with some form of mitochondrial disease, which can include poor growth, loss of muscle coordination, learning disabilities and heart disease," Sutovsky said. "Some scientists believe some of these diseases may be caused by heteroplasmy, or cells possessing both maternal and paternal mitochondrial DNA. We have succeeded in creating this condition of heteroplasmy within pig embryos, which will allow scientists to further study whether paternal heteroplasmy could cause mitochondrial diseases in humans."

Autophagy and ubiquitin–proteasome system contribute to sperm mitophagy after mammalian fertilization (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605844113) (DX)

Previous/Related:
Project to Repair Mitochondria Funded
Three-Person Babies Could Be Possible in Two Years
U.S. Panel Gives Tentative Endorsement to Three-Person IVF
Newcastle University Study Verifies Safety of Three-Person IVF


Original Submission

Singapore Could Become the Second Country to Legalize Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy 10 comments

Singapore could become the second country to legalize mitochondrial replacement therapy

This small city state could become the second country—after the United Kingdom—to explicitly legalize mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), a controversial assisted reproduction technique that allows women who are carriers of some rare genetic disorders to give birth to healthy babies.

Members of the Singaporean public and religious groups have until 15 June to provide their feedback about MRT to the Bioethics Advisory Committee (BAC). Based on its findings, a 13-member BAC review committee will make formal recommendations to the government later this year about whether to legalize the technology.

"Our position is to keep a close watch on what happens in the U.K., to track the U.K. experience, and to learn from what they have done," says Oi Lian Kon, who studies human genetics at the National Cancer Centre Singapore and is leading the BAC review group.

MRT is used to address devastating genetic diseases that arise from abnormalities in the DNA in mitochondria, the cell's power sources, and that commonly affect energy-intensive organs such as the brain and heart, as well as muscles. Children inherit mitochondria only from their mothers; replacing faulty mitochondria in an egg or embryo with normal ones from a donor can result in healthy babies. But it also means that offspring will bear DNA from three "parents," which makes MRT a controversial procedure.

Previously: UK Parliament Gives Three-"Source" IVF the Go-Ahead.
Approval for Three-Parent Embryo Trials
UK's Fertility Regulator Approves Creation of First "Three-Parent" Babies

Related: U.S. Panel Gives Tentative Endorsement to Three-Person IVF
Newcastle University Study Verifies Safety of Three-Person IVF
First Three-Person Baby Born Using Spindle Nuclear Transfer
Baby Girl Born in Ukraine Using Three-Parent Pronuclear Transfer Technique


Original Submission

First UK Baby With DNA From Three People Born After New IVF Procedure 7 comments

Mitochondrial donation treatment aims to prevent children from inheriting incurable diseases:

The first UK baby created with DNA from three people has been born after doctors performed a groundbreaking IVF procedure that aims to prevent children from inheriting incurable diseases.

The technique, known as mitochondrial donation treatment (MDT), uses tissue from the eggs of healthy female donors to create IVF embryos that are free from harmful mutations their mothers carry and are likely to pass on to their children.

Because the embryos combine sperm and egg from the biological parents with tiny battery-like structures called mitochondria from the donor's egg, the resulting baby has DNA from the mother and father as usual, plus a small amount of genetic material – about 37 genes – from the donor.

The process has led to the phrase "three-parent babies", though more than 99.8% of the DNA in the babies comes from the mother and father.

Research on MDT, which is also known as mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), was pioneered in the UK by doctors at the Newcastle Fertility Centre. The work aimed to help women with mutated mitochondria to have babies without the risk of passing on genetic disorders. People inherit all their mitochondria from their mother, so harmful mutations in the "batteries" can affect all of the children a woman has.

[...] The Newcastle process has several steps. First, sperm from the father is used to fertilise eggs from the affected mother and a healthy female donor. The nuclear genetic material from the donor's egg is then removed and replaced with that from the couple's fertilised egg. The resulting egg has a full set of chromosomes from both parents, but carries the donor's healthy mitochondria instead of the mother's faulty ones. This is then implanted in the womb.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:03AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:03AM (#359122)

    Every girl should have three mothers. Women don't need men to reproduce. Let men die and become extinct. For the good of womankind everywhere.

    Now some men might object. That's what prisons are for.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 13 2016, @04:06AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 13 2016, @04:06AM (#359125) Journal

      Aren't men the superior gender since they can theoretically create both boys or girls using their chromosomes?

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:13AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:13AM (#359135)

        Women have all the chromosomes they need to make more women, without the involvement of men. The Y chromosome is a defective X chromosome. Men are defective by birth.

        • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 13 2016, @04:21AM

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 13 2016, @04:21AM (#359142) Journal

          Fair enough, but a group of men could also create just males by picking X and Y chromosomes. The only things they are missing are an egg, which would have to be synthesized from scratch or transformed from another cell somehow, and an artificial womb. Those are engineering problems... should be a few men out there willing to tackle those, right?

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
          • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Monday June 13 2016, @09:13AM

            by butthurt (6141) on Monday June 13 2016, @09:13AM (#359263) Journal

            > [...] create just males by picking X and Y chromosomes.

            or create female offspring by picking X chromosomes from two different males?

            • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 13 2016, @09:25AM

              by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 13 2016, @09:25AM (#359267) Journal

              I already wrote that in another comment.

              The point of the post you replied to is to show that men could exclusively produce male offspring with no female involvement. However, it would be considerably harder than women exclusively producing female offspring with no male involvement, so that will happen first.

              I'm sure both scenarios have already seen extensive coverage in science fiction.

              --
              [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:22AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @04:22AM (#359143)

      Strindberg, the Swedish realist playwright, beat you to it. [theatrehistory.com]

    • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Monday June 13 2016, @05:38AM

      by butthurt (6141) on Monday June 13 2016, @05:38AM (#359176) Journal

      > [...] three mothers.

      One for the egg, one for the mitochondrion, and one for the womb?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @05:58AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2016, @05:58AM (#359182)

        The egg and womb could come from the same woman.

        The point is that an X chromosome from each of the two women can create a girl with two biological moms. The donor mitochondria are only needed if a mitochondrial disease is likely, and with two moms to choose from instead of just one that low risk is cut lower.

        The first girl to be born from two lesbian mothers will infuriate the religious more than IVF ever did. They will have to live in hiding and lie about the origin of the daughter.

        • (Score: 5, Informative) by butthurt on Monday June 13 2016, @09:24AM

          by butthurt (6141) on Monday June 13 2016, @09:24AM (#359266) Journal

          > with two moms to choose from instead of just one that low risk is cut lower.

          As I understand it, ordinarily the child gets an exact copy of the mother's mitochondria, and the father does not pass on his mitochondria. There's no process where mitochondrial DNA from two parents gets mixed. If you combined two eggs including both of their mitochondria, you'd have two distinct kinds of mitochondria. If the result grew into an embryo, I assume that it would wind up chimeric, having cells with each type of mitochondrion, and perhaps cells with both types, each exactly the same as provided by the two mothers. If one mother had defective mitochondria, the offspring would as well.

          • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 13 2016, @03:36PM

            by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 13 2016, @03:36PM (#359389) Journal

            I'm pretty sure the mitochondria are going to come from the mother who's egg was used. But the possibility of flushing out those mitochondria and replacing them with some from the second mom or a third woman is completely on the table. Mitochondrial disease is rare enough, but for both mother's mitochondria to be unsuitable would be extremely rare.

            --
            [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]