Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday September 21 2016, @04:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the every-little-bit-counts dept.

Fujitsu Laboratories and the Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute HHI today announced the development of a new method to simultaneously convert the wavelengths of wavelength-division-multiplexed signals necessary for optical communication relay nodes in future wavelength-division-multiplexed optical networks, and have successfully tested the method using high-bandwidth signal transmission in the range of 1 Tbps.

In the conventional optical wavelength conversion method each individual optical wavelength is converted into an electrical signal and re-transmitted at a new wavelength, which is impractical for terabit-class processing as each wavelength requires its own O/E/O [Optical/Electrical/Optical] circuit. Using the new technology, the optical wavelength conversion and the polarization state are controlled at the same time, so simultaneous wavelength conversion of wide-band optical signals can be achieved without restrictions on the wavelengths of the optical input signal or the modulation formats. As a result, processing can be achieved with a single wavelength converter, regardless of the number of wavelengths multiplexed. Therefore, considering optical signals in excess of 1 Tbps multiplexed from ten wavelengths, for example, the new method can process them using just one-tenth of the power or less compared to previous technologies that required a separate circuit to convert each wavelength into an electrical signal and back.

The researchers assert the method will boost signal throughput.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday September 21 2016, @05:25AM

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday September 21 2016, @05:25AM (#404661) Journal

    this will be useful for the [FOURTH DIRECTIVE TRIGGERED]

    --
    Account abandoned.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 21 2016, @09:46AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 21 2016, @09:46AM (#404722)

    So what's the trade-off here?
    Is it higher latency, higher cost, reduced bandwidth?

    • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Wednesday September 21 2016, @06:08PM

      by RamiK (1813) on Wednesday September 21 2016, @06:08PM (#404867)

      Looking at the summary, it's lower latency, lower cost & higher bandwidth.

      So, I'm guessing the downsides will be efficiency for narrow bandwidth applications. Maybe low tolerance to wide spectrum interference\spikes?

      Considering they only just built a demo circuit in the lab, we'll know in 3-5 years when \ if this hits the market.

      --
      compiling...