Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the capitalism-rocks! dept.

El Reg reports

A leaked presentation to Samsung executives has provided further insight into the company's damaged internal culture.

The PowerPoint document focuses on strategies to prevent the creation of labor unions at the South Korean company and takes a very aggressive stance, treating employees as enemies, and suggesting "countermeasures", as well as ways to "dominate employees".

It also talks about "punishing" union leaders, isolating "troublesome" employees, and "inducing internal conflicts" as a way of intimidating employees and preventing the creation of unions. The presentation is also dismissive of labor laws and government ministers that have proposed changes to protect employees.

The presentation [PPT] [PDF] is dated 2012, but appears to have been used repeatedly by Samsung executives up until two years ago. It was unearthed by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), which drew a direct line between the approach demonstrated in the presentation and the recent aborted launch of the Galaxy Note 7 due to exploding batteries.

"Inhumane conditions are rife" at the company, the ITUC reports, noting that Samsung employees are overworked, under-paid, and forced to suffer appalling conditions, including "standing for 11 to 12 hours, verbal and physical abuse, severe age and gender discrimination, and lack of worker safety".

It quotes one worker who claimed that during an intense three-month period in the run-up to the release of a Galaxy tablet she slept only two or three hours a night and had to give up breastfeeding her three-month-old baby as a result.

One [slide] lists examples of employee deaths that have been attributed to overwork. One employee, Kim, killed himself and the presentation notes that he had worked 100 hours of overtime each month for nine months. A widow of a manager is quoted as saying he "died from overwork".


Ed Note: Title changed to more accurately reflect content. 0700UTC

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:18AM (#418342)

    The title of the article is in no way linked to the content of the article.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41AM (#418345)

    And it's all by this spamming douchebag, phoenix, or the submission bot. We all need to step up, or else SN will shrivel away to death, without even a whimper.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM (#418352)

      Um, you forgot to post the reason you think this submission sucks.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:24AM

        by aristarchus (2645) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:24AM (#418437) Journal

        forgot to post the reason you think this submission sucks.

        We are dealing with an alt-right here, I fear. Reasoning and thinking are beyond his abilities, I am afraid. But he definitely disagrees, most strongly, for some reason he does not consciously recognize or understand. . . Brietbart!!!

    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:28AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:28AM (#418358)

      I wouldn't worry.

      Every time idiots like gewg or phoenix666 post their pathetic cries for attention get shredded and shat out like bran.

      OK, except for a few morons who believe them, but they're clearly in the minority.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM (#418364) Journal

      Do step up.

      I submit stories over morning coffee. Takes about 2-3 mins per. I have RSS feeds I scan for stories. When there are a lot I think the SN community will like discussing, I submit them all at once so the editors can bank them against the pipeline going dry. If others submit enough, you don't see many of my submissions. I prefer those times because it's nice to see something on the main page I haven't already seen. When the pipeline dries up, my submissions are there to keep things rolling. These last couple I submitted about a week ago.

      There's an FAQ with story submission guidelines [soylentnews.org]. It can help you if you haven't submitted before. I would add a couple tips that aren't in those guidelines. First, don't spend hours preparing a submission. If you did and it was turned down, you would probably be annoyed and never submit another; if it was accepted and it generated very little discussion, or even negative comments ("You SUCK!!! SN is going to the dogs, I'm leaving and never coming baaaack," etc.) you'll wonder why you wasted your time. On the bright side our kindly editors would probably give you a reason why it was rejected. (Slashdot never did, and they never accepted any of my submissions, which is why I quickly learned not to. In their case, they had a paid staff of editors who did it for you. Soylent is all volunteer.) So an investment of 2-3 minutes, or at least under 5 minutes per submission, is better.

      Second, copy & paste representative excerpts from the story you're linking to rather than summarizing in your own words. Few of us are expert enough or have enough time to sit there and fact-check everything in our written summary. Do it once, thinking you've got a solid handle of, say, database architecture, and getting chopped into a million tiny pieces by database architecture pedants will convince you to let the person getting paid to get it wrong (ie. the journalist) take the lashing.

      Anyway, those are a couple rules of thumb I use that others might find useful. If not, great. TIMTOWTDI [wikia.com].

      I look forward to seeing new submitters filling the pipeline. I'll keep submitting mine, but it would be quite alright to never see another one of them make the editors' cut.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM (#418365)

      And it's all by this spamming douchebag, phoenix, or the submission bot. We all need to step up and stop whining like a little bitch, or else SN will shrivel away to death, without even a whimper.

      There. FTFY.

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:42AM (#418347)

    So, Samsung (like pretty much everyone else) tries to poison the union well (for reasons both ostensibly good and bad).

    ... so their phones explode.

    What?

    Verizon pisses off unions and workers - oh noes! Teh Verizophones gonna assplode!

    AT&T pisses off unions and workers - duck and cover! Phones incoming!

    Here's a more plausible interpretation:

    Samsung, like most large companies, has a corporate culture that, depending on where you are, varies between great and horrible. Like most large companies, there's a huge problem of the left and right hands not merely not knowing what each other are up to, but frequently not being clear on each other's existence. Samsung, like most large companies, occasionally has monumental screwups.

    If there's anything (and I don't even believe this, but what the hell let's roll with it) to be criticised here, it's korean business law, and the general confucian cultural legacy that has ugly repercussions as measured in overwork, suicide rates and social stratification.

    If the cause and effect were really as suggested by the story, we'd expect rampant decay, incompetence, malfeasance and product failure. But we don't see that. We see one, fairly well-defined problem.

    And a few nitwits with an agenda (hey, gewg!)

    • (Score: 2) by fishybell on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM

      by fishybell (3156) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM (#418351)

      which drew a direct line

      What direct line? What indirect line?

      Workers on the factory floor (essentially everyone described above being inhumanely treated) don't have jack to do with the phone exploding.

      iPhones are made partially by slave labor, and they don't explode.

      It's all about the design. What other Samsung phone explodes? Obviously they have a problem, but the problem doesn't seam to be linkable to employee abuse.

      • (Score: 2) by Bogsnoticus on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:31AM

        by Bogsnoticus (3982) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:31AM (#418359)

        The presentation [PPT] [PDF] is dated 2012, but appears to have been used repeatedly by Samsung executives up until two years ago. It was unearthed by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), which drew a direct line between the approach demonstrated in the presentation and the recent aborted launch of the Galaxy Note 7 due to exploding batteries.

        My reading of it indicates that;
        They stopped using this approach 2 years ago, which coincides roughly when they would have been laying out the plans for the GN7.
        Therefore, the GN7 started exploding because they stopped abusing their employees.

        --
        Genius by birth. Evil by choice.
        • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:21AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:21AM (#418379)

          My reading of it indicates that[:]
          They stopped using this approach 2 years ago

          I took away a different reading:
          All their management types have previously consumed the presentation multiple times and are now fully aware of all of the recommended ways to abuse workers and have been for some time.

          -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

        • (Score: 4, Funny) by krishnoid on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:48AM

          by krishnoid (1156) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:48AM (#418389)

          Therefore, the GN7 started exploding because they stopped abusing their employees.

          Not quite. The culture never changed -- it's just that their R&D group found a way (fairly impressively) to refine and channel the employees' frustration into their battery technology.

          It worked well until the overwhelming depravity strained the batteries' structure until their containment fractured. At that point the batteries became despondent and pretty much just started committing suicide In the process, trying to take anyone in the vicinity with them using their (primarily combustible) available resources.

    • (Score: 1) by snmygos on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:58AM

      by snmygos (6274) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:58AM (#418410)

      Do you have read the article? Workers are deprived of sleep, of course, the quality of their work suffers!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:48PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:48PM (#418638)

        The problem does not appear to have been the quality of the work as such.

        The problem appears to have been the battery sources, or more particularly that they cheaped out on those, with the result that a small proportion, but large enough to make headlines, have catastrophic failures.

        Next time (I'm guessing here) they'll give up on some profit, and insist on massive penalty clauses for quality failures from battery suppliers.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:01AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:01AM (#418349)

    Based only on the summary, this sounds like the union bashing that Henry Ford engaged in before WWII. He hired goons to intimidate the union organizers and a variety of other unsavory tactics.

    • (Score: 2) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Tuesday October 25 2016, @04:21AM

      by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @04:21AM (#418396)

      Are you trying to say that's what caused the exploding Model T problem?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:21AM (#418436)

        They do not call it the Ford "Exploder" for nothing! Not to mention the S-Cape and the Extradition. Or was I thinking Dodge, or Bronco? Or Pinto, a cheaper Mustang, which is actually a valley in Tibet where the CIA funded Buddhists to fight the Godless Atheist Chi-coms? I forget, and so should you.

  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:22AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:22AM (#418355)

    I'd like to buy American, but I can't, because American corporate slavers implicitly condone overseas yellow slave labor.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:11AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:11AM (#418447)

      And American quality is trash. Local slaves have no work ethic.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:06PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:06PM (#418696)

        Exactly! The yellow man loves his work-till-you-drop peon culture! Lazy Americans demand things like safety, sane working hours, employee benefits and worst of all, a decent wage. Disgusting. Thank god for the yellow man. He'll work himself to the bone and be proud of it! He will show his fellow yellow that he too is a hard worker so they can both pat each other on the back on their way to an early grave. He doesn't need nor desire these silly lazy persons luxuries. Yellow culture FTW!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:16AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:16AM (#418378)

    I guess there are some haters with a hard on looking for somewhere to vent. The idea that corporate culture made the Samsung phones explode is pretty thin, but it is still plausible. Maybe an engineer got fed up with a shitty workplace... Still thin, but given some of the tripe that floats through here I'm surprised by the vitriol over the title.

    By hey, always nice to know the trolls are under the bridge; a certain comfort in the world being stable.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:46PM (#418507)

      Or maybe non-exploding phones requires the folks assembling them to care and provide attention to detail.

      This is hard to come by consistently unless your workers feel they are your partners.

      Kind of a repeat of Detroit versus Japan for cars a few decades ago.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:57PM

      by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:57PM (#418675) Journal

      The problem is that if you make it difficult to question management decisions, management will not get the information needed to make the right decisions. I would bet considerable that several of the Samsung engineers knew that there was a danger of this problem, but that either they didn't dare say so or were quashed.

      I'm not saying that the fact that the company is inhumane and treacherous is irrelevant, I'm saying that top-down domination requires that the decisions made be the top always be sufficiently correct.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by snufu on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:33AM

    by snufu (5855) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:33AM (#418418)

    Japanese workforce, 1970: "We are tired of being poor. We can make a better product for less than the Americans can. They are rich and lazy."
    Japanese workforce, 2000: "Screw this. I'm tired of slaving away for a company. Life is too short. You want me to work, treat me fairly and pay a fair wage."

    South Korean workforce, 2000: "We are tired of being poor. We can make a better product for less than the Japanese. They are rich and lazy."
    South Korean workforce, 2016: "Screw this. I'm tired of slaving away for a company. Life is too short. You want me to work, treat me fairly and pay a fair wage."

    Repeat for China, Mexico, etc, until we run out of exploitable desperate people in poor nations.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @07:26AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @07:26AM (#418431)

      I feel bad for you if you actually think people will be producing anything by hand in the near future, automation replaces these jobs every day.

    • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:08PM

      by LoRdTAW (3755) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:08PM (#418698) Journal

      Repeat for China, Mexico, etc, until we run out of exploitable desperate people in poor nations.

      At the rate we're going it'll come back full loop.
      (Made in America)

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by FatPhil on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:24AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:24AM (#418452) Homepage
    I applied for a job with Samsung at a new R&D office in Finland. It took 9 months for them to sort everything out. Me and 2 other ex-Nokia devs were employees 1-3 - initially we didn't even have a manager! After all that wait, by goodness I was excited by the new prospects.

    Until I saw Samsung from the inside, and handed in my resignation 9 weeks later.

    I genuinely can't believe they actually make any working products they're so disfuntional. Everything's so controlling. (E.g. they force Linux kernel developers to use Windows machines, including using a dysfunctional internally-written mail system (IE6.0 + Active-X) to send auto-mangled patches to LKML - that's just not going to work.) And they treat their lowly Korean workers like shit. And being good Koreans, they won't complain, as that brings shame on your superiors, which they are afraid to do at a deep-seated cultural level. (Being ingrained in Finnish culture - when you see something wrong, you bring it up, nobody keeps quiet just to be polite - I didn't fit in at all.)

    (The Finnish R&D manager was demoted within weeks of me resigning, I still wonder if that was because him losing a staff member so soon had brought shame on the company.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:01PM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:01PM (#418546) Journal

      Wow, FatPhil, I am glad you posted that. I was once interviewed to head up IT at some division of Samsung's. They turned me down because I don't speak enough Korean; I only speak enough to drink soju with my father-in-law. For years I've kicked myself for not having put more time into learning that language, for having missed out on the posh life in Korea I and my family might have had, a car with a driver, a palatial home, endless soju and Korean BBQ, all the perqs.

      You freed me of all that. Now I know we dodged a bullet.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:39PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @09:39PM (#418723)

        You forgot to mention Korean pussy.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:11PM (#418623)

    Page (of the pdf), gaffe

    15, mind control of our employees
    19, dominate employees in ordinary ways
    21, no-union policy
    43, employee "drinking capacity" monitored
    etc ad nauseam

    What an ugly document, the mangled English, the always funky and everchanging layout, the overlapping and partially invisible text (white text on white background), the frequent typos and of course the sickening content itself. Looks like it was dictated by Mussolini and composed by a toddler.

    Talk about class warfare. Makes me proud not to own a single Samshit product.