Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday October 28 2016, @01:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-it-doesn't-exist-we-would-need-to-create-it dept.

Sterile neutrinos (or inert neutrinos) are hypothetical particles (neutral leptons – neutrinos) that interact only via gravity and do not interact via any of the other fundamental interactions of the Standard Model. The term sterile neutrino is used to distinguish them from the known active neutrinos in the Standard Model, which are charged under the weak interaction.

From the Phys.Org article:

Dr Justin Evans, senior lecturer in particle physics at The University of Manchester, said the elusive 'sterile' neutrino, if proven to exist, has the potential to unlock the great mysteries of our Universe – even potentially explaining why we exist as we do. Researchers believe identifying this new particle would be even more significant than locating the original so-called 'God particle', the Higgs boson.

As part of an international collaboration Dr Evans has been the Physics Coordinator on the MINOS experiment, leading the experiment's physics programme. As well as leading this part of the MINOS collaboration he also coordinated the research combination with another programme called Daya Bay.

        --The MINOS experiment uses an intense beam of muon neutrinos that travels 735 km from the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Chicago to the Soudan Underground Laboratory in northern Minnesota. MINOS has made world-leading measurements to study how these neutrinos disappear as they travel between the two detectors.
        --The Daya Bay experiment looks at electron antineutrinos coming from a nuclear power plant in the Guangdong province of China. The Daya Bay project measured, for the first time, one of the parameters governing neutrino oscillations.
...
"The sterile neutrino could explain the puzzle of why the neutrino is so much lighter - by orders of magnitude - than any other massive particle. It could help to explain why the universe contains more matter than antimatter, ie help to explain why we exist as we do. And, if the sterile neutrino is heavy enough, it could even be part of the solution for the dark matter puzzle."

'God Particle' is taken. How about 'Satan Particle?'


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by mtrycz on Friday October 28 2016, @01:13PM

    by mtrycz (60) on Friday October 28 2016, @01:13PM (#419819)

    Higgs had reffered to it as "the goddamn particle" expressing his (and collegues') frustration of not being able to find it. Or something.

    The editor said they wouldn't publish a book with a "swear word" in it, so they edited it into this now-famous phrase of "God particle". Because, you know, religion meets physics and stuff. Such bullshit.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-Higgs-boson-called-the-God-particle [quora.com]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Particle_(book) [wikipedia.org]

    --
    In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
    • (Score: 2) by melikamp on Friday October 28 2016, @01:42PM

      by melikamp (1886) on Friday October 28 2016, @01:42PM (#419826) Journal
      This. And while I got nothing but respect for Higgs (listen to him on the radio, he's like the world's most likeable scientist), and have no desire to diminish his contributions, I don't particularly like the "Higgs" name, which is even less fair than the corresponding Nobel, given the massive number of people who should properly be credited with the discovery. How about "No Spin Particle"?
      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:55PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:55PM (#419832)

        How about "No Spin Particle"?

        That would be "scalar boson". Just like a spin 1 particle is a "vector boson".

        The problem is, we don't know for sure that Higgs is the only scalar boson. If some day it turned out that there are other scalar bosons that are not associated with the Higgs mechanism, the term would get problematic. For example, the inflaton (the inflaton field is supposed to have driven the inflation phase during big bang, and may or may not be identical with the Higgs field) is also assumed to be a scalar boson.

      • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Immerman on Friday October 28 2016, @01:56PM

        by Immerman (3985) on Friday October 28 2016, @01:56PM (#419833)

        Yeah, but the Jacob-Marley-Fytrfg-Ksfbh-Hasiugf-Msdvcak-Nadlyjvgf-Walsdgf-Xsdkjf-................. particle just doesn't roll off the tongue as easily, and can you imagine how long the papers would be? Heck, just refer to the particle by name and you've exceeded the 20 page minimum for your undergrad essay.

        So realistically, what are you going to do? Name it for the guy who first theorized it existed? Something random? Or for one of the many people who were mostly looking for *anything* at higher energy levels, with the Higgs just giving them some possible convenient energies to suspect something might exist at?

      • (Score: 4, Funny) by Thexalon on Friday October 28 2016, @02:33PM

        by Thexalon (636) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 28 2016, @02:33PM (#419854)

        How about "No Spin Particle"?

        Because then people will start calling it the "O'Reilly Particle" after Bill O'Reilly?

        --
        The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
        • (Score: 2, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday October 28 2016, @04:37PM

          by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday October 28 2016, @04:37PM (#419881) Journal

          No they won't. I've never seen a whiny, red-faced, apoplectic Higgs boson before.

          --
          I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @10:13PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @10:13PM (#419973)

          The "Cut his mike!" Particle.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:02PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:02PM (#419839)

      You're thinking Leon Lederman, not Higgs.

      • (Score: 2) by mtrycz on Friday October 28 2016, @08:25PM

        by mtrycz (60) on Friday October 28 2016, @08:25PM (#419949)

        Yeah, thanks.

        --
        In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
    • (Score: 2) by archfeld on Friday October 28 2016, @08:57PM

      by archfeld (4650) <treboreel@live.com> on Friday October 28 2016, @08:57PM (#419956) Journal

      How about the 'Limbo' particle. Implying those of virtue prior to Christ. Not a bad place, not Heaven, just sort of there. It seems appropriate.

      http://danteworlds.laits.utexas.edu/circle1.html [utexas.edu]

      --
      For the NSA : Explosives, guns, assassination, conspiracy, primers, detonators, initiators, main charge, nuclear charge
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:35PM (#419824)

    "New god particle," yeah. What is this, the guy's resume? Looking for a stable gig, eh.

  • (Score: 5, Funny) by inertnet on Friday October 28 2016, @02:02PM

    by inertnet (4071) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 28 2016, @02:02PM (#419840) Journal

    If they're sterile we should call them "neutered neutrinos".

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:08PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:08PM (#419844)

      No, that would be claiming they had some explicit procedure to neuter them, as opposed to being naturally sterile.

      • (Score: 1) by pTamok on Friday October 28 2016, @03:47PM

        by pTamok (3042) on Friday October 28 2016, @03:47PM (#419871)

        The hinny particle?

    • (Score: 4, Funny) by jimshatt on Friday October 28 2016, @03:05PM

      by jimshatt (978) on Friday October 28 2016, @03:05PM (#419860) Journal
      Neuterinos
      • (Score: 4, Funny) by Nerdfest on Friday October 28 2016, @03:09PM

        by Nerdfest (80) on Friday October 28 2016, @03:09PM (#419861)

        "The Flanders Particle"

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @05:32PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @05:32PM (#419897)

          "The Flanders Particle"

          That's not what Edna says. And and she's pretty much the Springfield bicycle, so she'd know.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday October 28 2016, @02:26PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday October 28 2016, @02:26PM (#419851) Journal

    Two God particles???!!!

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:38PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @02:38PM (#419856)

      Of course physics is polytheistic. Does that really surprise you?

  • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Friday October 28 2016, @03:14PM

    by mhajicek (51) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 28 2016, @03:14PM (#419864)

    How exactly do they plan on detecting it?

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday October 28 2016, @06:58PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Friday October 28 2016, @06:58PM (#419923)

      Since the Neutrinos are already excessively hard to detect, the trick is to properly sort the things you don't find.

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @04:18PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @04:18PM (#419876)

    'God Particle' is taken. How about 'Satan Particle?'

    How about "Trump particle". I leave the statement of the reason for this name as a reader exercise.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Friday October 28 2016, @07:16PM

      by HiThere (866) on Friday October 28 2016, @07:16PM (#419933) Journal

      You think it's orange?

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @06:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @06:53PM (#419920)

    To that end, new disease names should not include geographic locations; the names of people, occupations, animals, or food; or “terms that incite undue fear” (such as unknown, fatal, and epidemic). Instead, the names should use generic descriptions of symptoms (respiratory disease or watery diarrhea) and specific terms describing patients, epidemiology or the environment (juvenile, maternal, seasonal, summer, coastal), as well as pathogen names and arbitrary identifiers (alpha, beta, 1, 2, 3).

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/05/discovered-disease-who-has-new-rules-avoiding-offensive-names [sciencemag.org]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @07:03PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @07:03PM (#419927)

      Seasonal-Alpha-2-Watery-Alpha-1-Diarrhea-Omega-3/2-Gamma-1 particle

  • (Score: 3) by Gaaark on Friday October 28 2016, @09:27PM

    by Gaaark (41) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 28 2016, @09:27PM (#419961) Journal

    call it, say, "42"? :)

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Saturday October 29 2016, @05:42AM

      by Gaaark (41) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 29 2016, @05:42AM (#420055) Journal

      How is this spam??????

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Saturday October 29 2016, @12:25AM

    by t-3 (4907) on Saturday October 29 2016, @12:25AM (#419999) Journal

    Then we can get the conservatives to take action against climate change!