Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 15 2016, @03:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the hello,-ma,-ma-and-pa dept.

The UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority will decide on December 15th whether to let three-person embryo trials proceed:

Authorities in the United Kingdom may soon approve clinical testing of the so-called "three-parent embryo" technique to prevent the transmission of potentially fatal genetic disease, despite ongoing concerns about its effectiveness. An advisory panel of the U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), announced today that the procedure is ready for limited clinical testing, Nature reports, and HFEA is expected to make an official decision on whether to allow such trials on 15 December.

The first baby born using the technique occurred in September.


Original Submission

Related Stories

Fatal Genetic Conditions Could Return in Some 'Three-Parent' Babies 3 comments

Troubling new findings have been discovered that could affect the lives of (misleadingly* branded) "three-parent" offspring born thanks to breakthrough mitochondrial replacement therapy.

The technique grabbed the world's attention when in September a baby was born bearing the DNA of three parents, a feat that overcame the otherwise fatal Leigh syndrome** genetic disorder carried by the child's mother.

It was heralded as a major step up from in vitro fertilisation. in the technique, the nucleus of an egg from the syndrome-affected mother is implanted into a female donor egg with healthy mitochondria which has had its nucleus removed. The resulting egg is fertilised with the father's sperm.

It has since been approved by the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority with the first treatments possible in 2018.

Now a paper (pdf) published in the journal Nature – and written by 30 researchers headed by Oregon Health and Science University Dr Shoukhrat Mitalipov – has found mitochondrial replacement therapy in 15 per cent of cases may allow the fatal defects it amends to resurface, even introducing new defects.

[Ed. Note: The asterisk in the first line refers to a footnote in the source article; it is not a typo.]


Original Submission

Baby Girl Born in Ukraine Using Three-Parent Pronuclear Transfer Technique 5 comments

Ethicists are bothered by the circumstances surrounding the world's first use of pronuclear transfer to create a baby:

It was a first for the entire world: Using a controversial in vitro fertilization technique, doctors in Kiev, Ukraine, helped a previously infertile couple conceive and deliver a baby girl. Some critics say, for genetic reasons, the use of this IVF method should have been restricted to producing a baby boy. The baby was born on January 5, the result of an experimental technique known as "pronuclear transfer" and sometimes referred to as three-parent IVF. The 34-year-old Ukrainian mother suffered from "unexplained infertility," according to Dr. Valery Zukin, director of the Nadiya Clinic for Reproductive Medicine, where the controversial pronuclear transfer technique was performed. She did not have mitochondrial disease.

[...] The reason this experimental method is a cause for concern -- and was vigorously debated in the UK before approval -- is the genetic modifications produced in a girl baby could be passed onto her children, according to Lori P. Knowles, adjunct assistant professor at the University of Alberta School of Public Health.

Boy babies carrying donor mitochondria cannot pass their modified genetics onto any future children they may have because once a sperm fuses with an egg to form an embryo, the masculine mitochondrion withers and dies leaving the resulting embryo with only mitochondrion from the mother's egg. "I do think it's highly significant that this is a girl because we know for sure that she will be passing on her mitochondrial DNA through her maternal line," said Knowles. If in the future this baby girl has genetic children, they will inherit her genetic modifications "and that's always been a really bright line," said Knowles -- a line not to be crossed until rigorous scientific testing proves it is safe.

The previous three-parent baby was conceived using spindle nuclear transfer, and couldn't pass on donor mitochondrial DNA (well, conventionally anyway) as a male. The Ukrainian procedure was used as a workaround for infertility rather than mitochondrial disease. The article also notes that Dr. Valery Zukin, director of the Nadiya Clinic for Reproductive Medicine where the procedure was performed, is also the vice president of the medical review board that approved the procedure.

Also at BBC and Smithsonian Magazine:

The mother in question had been unable to get pregnant for 15 years. Using the procedure as an IVF technique allows doctors to bypass cells or enzymes in the mother's egg that might prevent pregnancy or hinder cell division, explains Andy Coghlan at New Scientist .

Previously: Mitochondrial DNA Manipulation and Ethics
Approval for Three-Parent Embryo Trials
Fatal Genetic Conditions Could Return in Some 'Three-Parent' Babies


Original Submission

UK's Fertility Regulator Approves Creation of First "Three-Parent" Babies 13 comments

Doctors have been given permission to create the UK's first "three-parent" or "three-person" babies to mitigate the risk of inheritable mitochondrial diseases:

Doctors have received permission to create the UK's first "three-person" babies for two women at risk of passing inheritable diseases to their children.

The two cases involve women who have mitochondrial diseases, which are passed down by the mother and can prove fatal.

Three-person babies involve an advanced form of IVF that uses a donor egg, the mother's egg and the father's sperm.

Doctors at the Newcastle Fertility Centre will carry out the procedure.

The decision was approved by the UK Fertility Regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).

Also at New Scientist.

Previously: Mitochondrial DNA Manipulation and Ethics
Approval for Three-Parent Embryo Trials
Fatal Genetic Conditions Could Return in Some 'Three-Parent' Babies
Baby Girl Born in Ukraine Using Three-Parent Pronuclear Transfer Technique
FDA Warns Doctor Against Marketing Three-Person IVF Technique

Related: First Human Embryo Editing Performed in the UK


Original Submission

Singapore Could Become the Second Country to Legalize Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy 10 comments

Singapore could become the second country to legalize mitochondrial replacement therapy

This small city state could become the second country—after the United Kingdom—to explicitly legalize mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), a controversial assisted reproduction technique that allows women who are carriers of some rare genetic disorders to give birth to healthy babies.

Members of the Singaporean public and religious groups have until 15 June to provide their feedback about MRT to the Bioethics Advisory Committee (BAC). Based on its findings, a 13-member BAC review committee will make formal recommendations to the government later this year about whether to legalize the technology.

"Our position is to keep a close watch on what happens in the U.K., to track the U.K. experience, and to learn from what they have done," says Oi Lian Kon, who studies human genetics at the National Cancer Centre Singapore and is leading the BAC review group.

MRT is used to address devastating genetic diseases that arise from abnormalities in the DNA in mitochondria, the cell's power sources, and that commonly affect energy-intensive organs such as the brain and heart, as well as muscles. Children inherit mitochondria only from their mothers; replacing faulty mitochondria in an egg or embryo with normal ones from a donor can result in healthy babies. But it also means that offspring will bear DNA from three "parents," which makes MRT a controversial procedure.

Previously: UK Parliament Gives Three-"Source" IVF the Go-Ahead.
Approval for Three-Parent Embryo Trials
UK's Fertility Regulator Approves Creation of First "Three-Parent" Babies

Related: U.S. Panel Gives Tentative Endorsement to Three-Person IVF
Newcastle University Study Verifies Safety of Three-Person IVF
First Three-Person Baby Born Using Spindle Nuclear Transfer
Baby Girl Born in Ukraine Using Three-Parent Pronuclear Transfer Technique


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by fishybell on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:43AM

    by fishybell (3156) on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:43AM (#441514)

    If the first baby was already born, weren't they already doing trials? Someone needs to explain why that trial is different from the clinical trials they are now starting.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @08:09AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @08:09AM (#441540)

      Different countries have different rules. Shocker.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:55AM (#441516)

    If an X chromosome and a Y chromosome are placed into another woman's egg then the process always has two genetic mothers. On this basis, does the father of a three parent child pay more alimony or less alimony?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:02AM (#441518)

      If an X chromosome and a Y chromosome are placed into another woman's egg then the process always has two genetic mothers.

      No, I think you misunderstand what "genetic" means. One genetic, another mitochondrial, and possibly a third gestational. But I am just here to preemptively remind Runaway1946 that he is an ass.

      • (Score: 2) by fishybell on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:04AM

        by fishybell (3156) on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:04AM (#441519)

        Two genetic, one mitochondrial, possibly a fourth gestational.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:34PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:34PM (#441716) Journal

      I doubt a judge will factor in the mitochondrial mother at all, but we may be in for crazier scenarios, such as pick-and-choose genetics from 3 mothers, 1 mitochondrial, and a surrogate to give birth. That's 5 "mothers". And I think I know who to market that procedure to..........

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:42AM (#441523)

    That's gonna make for some tricky paper-work

    • (Score: 2, Flamebait) by aristarchus on Thursday December 15 2016, @07:17AM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Thursday December 15 2016, @07:17AM (#441534) Journal

      And you are forgetting the one that actually parents the child, the one that matters, the one that stays after all the other biological mercenaries have been paid off and have left, like Francis. The REAL parent. Genes mean nothing. It is the one, or the two, or the many, that raises the child who are the actual parents.

      • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday December 15 2016, @01:17PM

        by Thexalon (636) on Thursday December 15 2016, @01:17PM (#441581)

        Well, I guess we need to change all the forms then, to ask for all the parents: Mother, Father, Smizmar, etc.

        --
        The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @01:46PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @01:46PM (#441587)

        If the genes mean nothing then why not just adopt?