Canada's telecom regulator yesterday declared that broadband Internet must be considered "a basic telecommunications service for all Canadians" and created a fund to connect rural and remote communities. With this decision, high-speed broadband is now treated as an essential technology similar to voice service.
All Canadians should be able to purchase home Internet with 50Mbps download speeds and 10Mbps uploads, and they should have the option of purchasing unlimited data, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announcement said. A new fund will make $750 million available over the next five years to support projects in areas where that level of broadband isn't available.
Money will be distributed to applicants based upon a competitive process. Funding can be used either for fixed broadband service or to upgrade mobile networks, but the goals of 50Mbps/10Mbps and unlimited data for all is specifically for home Internet service. About 10 percent will be allocated to communities that are dependent on satellite access.
Currently, about 18 percent of Canadians, representing 2 million households, don't have access to 50Mbps/10Mbps service. "The CRTC's goal is to reduce that to 10 per cent by 2021 and down to zero in the next 10 to 15 years," a CBC article said.
This sort of thing is why I have so much affection for Canada.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @11:36AM
Hold on let me run a speed test. 750kbps. That's fast enough for me, and I've been streaming CBC TV shows tonight. What are these whiners whining about. Bunch of whiners.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @12:06PM
Grandpa got out of bed, eh?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @12:33PM
Corner Gas looks fine to me in 360p, jackass!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @02:18PM
Hold on let me run a speed test. 750kbps. That's fast enough for me, and I've been streaming CBC TV shows tonight. What are these whiners whining about. Bunch of whiners.
640k ought to be enough for everyone!
On an unrelated note, why do people keep making wheelchairs? I can still walk just fine. Bunch of whiners.
(Score: 1) by marknmel on Saturday December 24 2016, @02:48PM
I'm a Canadian. Sorry eh.
I live in a medium sized city, fairly close to Trumpland.
The problem that's I think this legislation is trying to solve is fair access for all. It doesn't matter if you are in the far north, or even the populated south, it's the incumbents that have been screwing the country for years, and doing so with one hand in the pocket of the taxpayers and with one hand in the pocket of the consumer. (I have two pockets...)
The incumbents have egregious pricing (dsl), or lack features like staticc ip addresses (cable). Both incumbents offer reasonable network access speeds. I'm more aware of the DSL side as that's my preference, but speeds from 5/1, 8/1 , 15/1, 25/10, 50/10 are common. The data caps and overage charges were ridiculous.
It's always been my preference to use an industry isp. They buy access to the incumbent system at a wholesale rate, offer you a bit of a break on pricing and overage charges, are very reliable technically, employ Canadians, and are generally nice and helpful if you need them.
At the end of my street (about 15 houses away) there is a fiber node. The incumbents (until semi-recently) have access to 5/1 infrastructure, despite (at the time) paying for 8/1, and originally having 8/1 - the incumbent is also using dsl to offer their own television service. The incumbent without warning would downgrade my circuit.
Recently the CRTC has allowed Indy ISPs to fully access fiber to the node infrastructure. Currently on 25/10 with a 400GB cap.
So I'm a bit weary of the pricing models and offerings to say the least.
There is nothing that can't be solved with one more layer of indirection.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Saturday December 24 2016, @07:04PM
There's a few Canucks here, me also.
I was always going over my cap and paying extra for it (made my wife mad, lol). Then Bell made an offer of "for $5.00 more per month, I could get unlimited!"
So I went for it and haven't looked back at the money I'm 'saving', lol.
Yes, they throttle me, but overnight, I can get good torrent speeds.... for my Linux distribution downloads of course :)
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by dry on Sunday December 25 2016, @04:04AM
I'm also not far from Trumpland, perhaps 40 miles east of Vancouver and all I can do is dream of even 5/1 as I post on my $38 (I see it's gone up again as well as call display is now $9 a month, bastards) 26.4 kb/s dial up connection. Be nice to be able to get Satellite (hiding behind a hill) and I dream of having working cell service. Worst is that Telus announced they're dropping dial-up on Nov 16th due to not being able to get equipment (it's still working for now), so soon I'll be in a worst position (at home) then the average person in Nunavut while be easily able to commute to Vancouver.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @03:26PM
Let's see you do it with a few hundred million extra illegals in your country, most of which don't speak either of your national languages.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @06:19PM
Exactly which country has "a few hundred million extra illegals" in it? I'll wait while you google the answer. Math is hard. So is common sense.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @04:08PM
Yeah, who cares if using the wrong pronoun is a criminal offence when there's decent internet on offer?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @05:30PM
unlimited interwebz = unlimited misgender trolling
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 24 2016, @05:54PM
Is there something else people use these interwebs for? That's all I use them for.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by dbv on Saturday December 24 2016, @04:20PM
For Bell/Rogers/Telus (our triopoly). In case anyone doubts. The government will build the lines, even to places where it makes little economic sense. Then they'll turn them over to the triopoly. It would be a good idea if they built the lines and then formed municipal corporations to lease the lines to telecoms.
It's hard to avoid the triopoly service. Smaller, municipal telecoms, only exist if the triopoly isn't interested in providing service in a particular area.
(Score: 2) by acid andy on Saturday December 24 2016, @04:47PM
Does Fair Use apply?
Master of the science of the art of the science of art.
(Score: 2) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Saturday December 24 2016, @08:23PM
No.
In Canada we have a concept of fair dealing, which is similar.
(Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Saturday December 24 2016, @08:26PM
I swear I searched for the key-word "internet" before submittting.
CRTC declares broadband internet access a basic service [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 25 2016, @02:03PM
Just like everybody can purchase a Tesla... whether you can afford one is another question altogether!