China's President has pledged $124 billion for a new "Silk Road" connecting Asia, Africa, and Europe:
Chinese President Xi Jinping on Monday urged major multilateral institutions to join his new Belt and Road Initiative, stressing the importance of rejecting protectionism in seeking global economic growth.
Addressing other world leaders at a summit on the initiative in Beijing, Xi said it was necessary to coordinate policies with the development goals of institutions including the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), ASEAN, African Union and the European Union.
Xi pledged $124 billion on Sunday for his new Silk Road which aims to bolster China's global leadership ambitions by expanding links between Asia, Africa, Europe and beyond, as U.S. President Donald Trump promotes "America First".
No one is totally sure. At the most basic level, One Belt, One Road (OBOR) is a collection of interlinking trade deals and infrastructure projects throughout Eurasia and the Pacific, but the definition of what exactly qualifies as an OBOR project or which countries are even involved in the initiative is incredibly fuzzy. "It means everything and it means nothing at the same time," said Christopher Balding, a professor of economics at Peking University. [...] According to Chinese state media, some $1 trillion has already been invested in OBOR, with another several trillion due to be invested over the next decade.
Fuzzier story at CNN. More at Wikipedia.
Related: China Plans World's Longest Tunnel
China to Spend $182 Billion on Network Infrastructure
China Invests $45 Billion in Megacity Project
China Finances and Builds $13 Billion Railway in Kenya
China Plans $503 Billion Investment in High-Speed Rail by 2020
Related Stories
mrbluze writes:
"Projected to cost around US$37 billion, China has resurrected plans for an underwater tunnel 123km in length, Daily Mail reports that 'the tunnel will run from the port city of Dalian in northeastern Liaoning province to Yantai city in eastern Shandong, slashing travel time to 40 minutes.'
China first announced plans in 1994 to build the tunnel, at an estimated cost of $10 billion, with completion set before 2010. But 20 years on, the project remains stuck in the planning stage. The project has also been proposed at the annual session of China's parliament every year since 2009.
A world wonder, or just another pipe dream?"
China has announced plans to spend $182 billion over the next 30 months to modernize the nation's network infrastructure:
The State Council, China's chief administrative authority, said the government will invest at least $69.3bn in network construction this year, which in turn will be supplemented with $112.8bn in expenditure before the end of 2017, all in order to accelerate the construction of fiber optic networks and 4G networks.
The state investment follows Li Keqiang, the State Council Premier, announcing China's "Internet Plus" policy, which is intended to see the nation focus on domestic technology adoption in order to boost domestic growth while also giving Chinese technology firms a chance do do better overseas.
Complaining about China's internet speeds previously, Keqiang undershot the Network Readiness Index [which ranks China 62nd], instead seemingly favouring Akamai's State of the Internet: Q4 2014 report [Subscription required], stating that "China has more cellphone users than any other country, but its net service speed ranks below 80th in the world due to underdeveloped information infrastructure".
The State Council has said: "By the end of 2017, all households in locations above prefecture level will have access to 100 Mbps fiber optic networks, over 80 per cent of villages will be covered by fiber optic networks, all cities and villages will be covered by 4G networks, and broadband speeds in municipalities and provincial capitals will reach 30 Mbps."
China is investing an additional $45 billion in a megacity project that will merge Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei provinces:
China on Friday earmarked 290 billion yuan ($45.45 billion) for manufacturing and industrial park projects to support its efforts to integrate Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province into a megacity, state media reported.
The government hopes to ease pressures on its crowded capital by transferring industries further out into the integrated metropolis, which it says has a combined population of about 110 million people. It dubbed the area "Jing-Jin-Ji" last year, using shortened versions of the names of the cities and province.
Demographia World Urban Areas lists the fastest growing cities as Batam, Mogadishu, Burkina Faso, Xiamen, and Yinchuan. Megacities and the impending 70% urbanization of the world's population have their proponents, such as architect Lord Foster:
Design plays a huge part. Cities that are consistently rated highly by the public in terms of quality of life are relatively compact and pedestrian-friendly, with good public transport and generous parks and civic spaces. These more desirable cities are comparatively dense and have evolved historically from a traditional European concept. They consume less energy than the more recent suburban model of cities – like LA with its low-density housing and a dependence on car travel. A new study suggests that urban sprawl costs the US economy more than $1 trillion annually.
Across the globe, people are likely to live longer and healthier lives in cities. In most countries in the world, cities provide better access to education and health services. The longest life expectancies today can be found in high-density, highly developed cities like Hong Kong or Singapore. Unlike cumbersome national governments and international organisations, cities can act quickly and decisively. When it comes to the future of life on Earth, cities are not the problem – they are the solution.
Via NextBigFuture.
CNN reports:
It's been billed as the most ambitious project in Kenya since it gained independence in 1963.
Now, the first section of the east African nation's $13.8 billion railway is nearly finished.
Originally planned to link Mombasa and Nairobi, the decision was made to extend the line to the market town of Naivasha in 2015, and 75% of civil works have reportedly been completed. This first Mombasa-Nairobi stretch will be completed by June 2017, consulting firm CPCS told CNN.
It is hoped that the track will shorten the journey between the two cities from 12 hours to four hours. Passenger trains will travel at 120km/h, and freight trains will be able to carry 25 million tonnes per year, according to the International Railway Journal.
Eventually, the East Africa Railway Masterplan will link Mombasa with other major east African cities such as Kampala, in Uganda, and Juba, in South Sudan.
[...] The railway is being built by the state-owned China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC), 90% of the ongoing development of the Mombasa-Nairobi section is being financed by The Export-Import Bank of China.
China has been investing heavily in Africa over the last decade. Some have accused it of "neo-colonialism," of only trying to lock-in access to the continent's natural resources.
According to a report at Bloomberg , China plans a major investment in high-speed rail over the next five years: $503 Billion:
China plans to spend 3.5 trillion yuan ($503 billion) to expand its railway system by 2020 as it turns to investments in infrastructure to bolster growth and improve connectivity across the country.
The high-speed rail network will span more than 30,000 kilometers (18,650 miles) under the proposal, according to details released at a State Council Information Office briefing in Beijing Thursday. The distance, about 6.5 times the length of a road trip between New York and Los Angeles, will cover 80 percent of major cities in China.
The plan will see high-speed rail lines across the country expand by more than half over a five-year period, a boon to Chinese suppliers of rolling stock such as CRRC Corp. and rail construction companies including China Railway Construction Corp. and China Railway Group Ltd. Earlier this year, China turned to a private company for first time to operate an inter-city rail service on the mainland, part of President Xi Jinping's push to modernize the nation's transport network amid slowing growth in the world's second-largest economy.
China will also add 3,000 kilometers to its urban rail transit system under the plan released Thursday.
At the end of 2015, China had 121,000 kilometers of railway lines, including 19,000 kilometers of high-speed tracks, according to a transportation white paper issued Thursday. The U.S. had 228,218 kilometers of rail lines as of 2014, according to latest available data from the World Bank.
The Chinese government will invite private investment to participate in funding intercity and regional rail lines, Yang Yudong, administrator of the National Railway Administration, said at the briefing.
Compare that to what it would cost, and how long it would take, to create the same high-speed rail links between 80% of major cities in the USA. I suspect it would be considered a miracle if half the cases would make it out of the courts in five years. Think of the advancements in manufacturing that can arise when "here" and "there" are "nearby" instead of "far away".
G7 aims to raise $600 billion to counter China's Belt and Road
Group of Seven leaders on Sunday pledged to raise $600 billion in private and public funds over five years to finance needed infrastructure in developing countries and counter China's older, multitrillion-dollar Belt and Road project.
U.S. President Joe Biden and other G7 leaders relaunched the newly renamed "Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment," at their annual gathering being held this year at Schloss Elmau in southern Germany.
Biden said the United States would mobilize $200 billion in grants, federal funds and private investment over five years to support projects in low- and middle-income countries that help tackle climate change as well as improve global health, gender equity and digital infrastructure.
The Belt and Road Initiative, formerly known as One Belt One Road or OBOR for short, is a global infrastructure development strategy adopted by the Chinese government in 2013 to invest in nearly 70 countries and international organizations.
Previously:
China Plans $503 Billion Investment in High-Speed Rail by 2020
Chinese President Xi Jinping Pledges $124 Billion for One Belt, One Road Initiative
China's 'Belt and Road' Plan in Pakistan Takes a Military Turn
When President Trump started the new year by suspending billions of dollars of security aid to Pakistan, one theory was that it would scare the Pakistani military into cooperating better with its American allies.
The reality was that Pakistan already had a replacement sponsor lined up.
Just two weeks later, the Pakistani Air Force and Chinese officials were putting the final touches on a secret proposal to expand Pakistan's building of Chinese military jets, weaponry and other hardware. The confidential plan, reviewed by The New York Times, would also deepen the cooperation between China and Pakistan in space, a frontier the Pentagon recently said Beijing was trying to militarize after decades of playing catch-up.
All those military projects were designated as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative, a $1 trillion chain of infrastructure development programs stretching across some 70 countries, built and financed by Beijing.
Chinese officials have repeatedly said the Belt and Road is purely an economic project with peaceful intent. But with its plan for Pakistan, China is for the first time explicitly tying a Belt and Road proposal to its military ambitions — and confirming the concerns of a host of nations who suspect the infrastructure initiative is really about helping China project armed might.
Related: China's Xi Jinping Negotiates $46bn Superhighway to Pakistan
China Plans $503 Billion Investment in High-Speed Rail by 2020
Chinese President Xi Jinping Pledges $124 Billion for One Belt, One Road Initiative
Gunmen Attack Chinese Consulate in Pakistan
Italy joins China's New Silk Road project
Italy has become the first developed economy to sign up to China's global investment programme which has raised concerns among Italy's Western allies.
A total of 29 deals amounting to €2.5bn ($2.8bn) were signed during Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Rome. The project is seen as a new Silk Road which, just like the ancient trade route, aims to link China to Europe. Italy's European Union allies and the United States have expressed concern at China's growing influence.
The new Silk Road has another name - the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) - and it involves a wave of Chinese funding for major infrastructure projects around the world, in a bid to speed Chinese goods to markets further afield. Critics see it as also representing a bold bid for geo-political and strategic influence.
Also at Bloomberg and The Washington Post.
Related: China's Xi Jinping Negotiates $46bn Superhighway to Pakistan
China Plans $503 Billion Investment in High-Speed Rail by 2020
Chinese President Xi Jinping Pledges $124 Billion for One Belt, One Road Initiative
China's $1 Trillion Belt and Road Project Includes Military Cooperation With Pakistan
Karachi attack: China consulate attack leaves four dead
Gunmen have killed at least four people in an attack on the Chinese consulate in the Pakistani port city of Karachi. Gunshots were heard at about 09:30 local time (04:30 GMT) outside the consulate in the upmarket Clifton area. Police shot dead three attackers.
Separatist militants who oppose Chinese investment projects in western Pakistan say they carried out the attack. [...] All the staff inside the consulate are safe, China said. The government condemned the attack on its mission and the foreign ministry in Beijing called for extra measures to protect Chinese citizens in Pakistan. "At the same time we mourn the deaths of the Pakistani police and think of their families at this time," a spokesman said.
[...] A separatist group, the Balochistan Liberation Army, said it had carried out the attack. It is one of a number of separatist groups operating in the province, which has seen a long-running nationalist insurgency. "We have been seeing the Chinese as an oppressor, along with Pakistani forces," a spokesman for the group told the AFP news agency.
Over the years, construction projects and Chinese workers in Balochistan have been repeatedly targeted by militants. Most recently, a suicide bombing in August injured a number of Chinese engineers. So far, none of the incidents has been large enough in scale to really threaten the viability of Chinese investment in the country. But this is one of the most prominent attacks to date.
(Score: 2) by gawdonblue on Tuesday May 16 2017, @11:11AM (9 children)
So China is spending the equivalent of the next 8 countries worth on building up trade. It could have been on arms instead. Which one will pay off?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 16 2017, @11:45AM (4 children)
So China is spending the equivalent of the next 8 countries worth on building up trade.
I know this is meant merely as literary flourish, but the US and EU probably spend more each on trade than China does, being considerably larger economic zones, and all of this government-level spending on trade is dwarfed by private trade-related spending from any one of the three.
(Score: 2) by butthurt on Tuesday May 16 2017, @01:42PM (3 children)
What do you mean by "larger"?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 16 2017, @11:05PM (2 children)
What do you mean by "larger"?
Larger GDP.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 17 2017, @04:43AM (1 child)
You would probably like to still revisit that statement.
So they aren't really "considerably" larger economic zones. Keeping aside USA, the next 5 countries in EU altogether are barely larger than China. And don't get me started on area of economic zones, or even population.
This image [wikipedia.org] captures this very well.
Secondly, GDP doesn't measure living costs which is almost 200% lower in China than the topmost EU country - Germany. While this means purchasing power parity of Germany is bigger than China, what it really means is that number of $124 billion is actually a lot more when adjusted to ppp.
So OP is correct to say that China is investing more in building up trade than European countries selling arms.
To OP, you are wrong to say that selling arms is not investing in building up trade. The West owes everything it has today to investing in arms, including NASA, the Internet, almost all of the economy after WW1 and most importantly, the colonial loot.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday May 17 2017, @01:01PM
(Score: 3, Interesting) by ikanreed on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:24PM (3 children)
History has shown that the largest economies can shift rapidly to being the largest military, without requiring huge standing armies.
The USA's inverse approach of sinking endless amounts of potential economic growth into military forces essentially forces a political necessity of wasting that military wealth on unnecessary, meaningless wars.
The end game for every empire like that in history is to start dumping fiscal assets into mercenaries, and then being dumbfounded when the mercenaries switch sides to the people who want to plunder you a generation or two later.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:54PM (1 child)
History has shown that the largest economies can shift rapidly to being the largest military, without requiring huge standing armies.
Can't build 4000 nukes in 30 minutes though.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by ikanreed on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:58PM
China has about 5% as many nukes as the US, but it's almost as much deterrent for us to want to not want to fuck with them, the intricacies of Sino-Russian geopolitics notwithstanding.
(Score: 2) by GungnirSniper on Wednesday May 17 2017, @04:02AM
We can't build roads because that will induce demand, man.
Tips for better submissions to help our site grow. [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @11:58AM
Wait a few years for stories about literal billions unaccountably disappearing into a vast bureaucracy without anyone being able to trace it and the stonewalling of a large monolithic entity preventing effective journalism.
Don't worry though! There's a new anti-corrpution campaign, focused on both ants and tigers, which is ideally situated to handle this well, and it even is headed by Xi Jinping himself (IIRC) What luck it has such access!
Surely the inevitable scandal won't be used to, after it has enriched Xi and friends, imprison his rivals?
Surely not, this is China after all.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @01:12PM
One of the most nationalistic countries in the world, chuck full of trade barriers for its domestic market (and other underhanded tactics), is coming out AGAINST protectionism. Yeah Xi, go fuck yourself.
(Score: 2) by AnonTechie on Tuesday May 16 2017, @01:24PM
Exclusive: CPEC master plan revealed
Dawn has acquired exclusive access to the original document, and for the first time its details are being publicly disclosed here. The plan lays out in detail what Chinese intentions and priorities are in Pakistan for the next decade and a half, details that have not been discussed in public thus far.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1333101 [dawn.com]
+++
Albert Einstein - "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @02:37PM (5 children)
The running narrative seems to be:
Chinese nationalism=good.
American nationalism=bad.
Palestinian nationalism=good.
Israeli nationalism=bad.
Ukrainian nationalism=good.
Russian nationalism=bad.
Japanese nationalism=good.
North Korean nationalism=bad.
Swiss nationalism=good.
German nationalism=bad.
So nationalism itself=?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:01PM (2 children)
You seem to be confusing nationalism and jingoism.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @05:24PM
A distinction without a difference
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @07:35PM
You seem to be confusing reason and ideology.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:56PM
roads != nukes.
trade deals != sponsoring and training terrorists.
(Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 16 2017, @08:01PM
Citation needed for all of these.
I think the thing you're missing is that "nationalism to protect your country from an aggressive invader isn't too bad", and that "nationalism which encourages invading your neighbors is bad".
Palestine isn't invading anyone, they're being occupied and oppressed by Israel.
Ukraine isn't invading anyone, they're being invaded and occupied by Russia.
Japan isn't invading anyone these days, so no one really cares if they're nationalistic as long as they're not militaristic, which they're not any more.
North Korea wants to take over the South, and has wanted this ever since the Korean War.
The Swiss have never invaded anyone, and are very strongly neutral.
American nationalism seems to usually involve blatant racism and white supremacy much like the German nationalism during the Nazi era.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @03:17PM
communism is the better capitalism.
with communism you get to officially brainwash your workers thus instilling
a solid nationalism.
with capitalism there is always the danger of making a quick buck by selling out (to the better capitalism).
all the ethics, being green, protecting nature etc etc. is a sham to burden down further growth.
of course the sucrupel-less will not be hampered by it and after enough asphalt and shipping lanes have been established
it should be fairly simple to roll some tanks to these green and healthy location to claim all the outstanding debts ...
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday May 16 2017, @04:52PM (3 children)
Which is to say, using economic growth to build up to global hegemony.
I want you all to remember something: China is 4,000+ years old. Not in its modern form of course, but even when it was basically a collection of warring states on the east coast of Asia, there was already a long-seated culture (or several) that had taken root. China isn't so much a country as it is a sort of multi-millennial concept of civilization, and I have no doubt many of its leaders see themselves as heads of a temporarily-embarrassed natural elite. We would do well to "get inside their heads" as it were, something I've been trying to do by learning at least a little Mandarin.
And you know what else? They'll do it, too. The US has long since lost what little moral standing it had--and given what we've done to other countries since the mid 19th century and to our own indigenous people since the mid 17th, that's not a hell of a lot. Now we've become a corrupt cesspool of cronyism, and are suffering the national-institutions versions of diabetic dementia and arteriosclerosis. China is worse than we are in many ways, and I don't see it improving much when--not if, when--they become the global dominant superpower, but it will happen.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16 2017, @09:28PM (2 children)
Last I checked the USA wasn't murdering political prisoners to harvest their organs for party members.
Killing other countries innocents as collateral damage in a war is far better than intentionally murdering the innocents one literally exists to protect.
By all means USA, continue your self-hatred party, but don't attempt to place such scum as China beneath you. That isn't just virtue signalling self-degrading, it's insulting to the billions who suffer under properly oppressive regimes.
(Score: 3, Touché) by FunkyLich on Tuesday May 16 2017, @10:46PM
I wonder when was the last time you checked a history book? I mean books which don't have the wars like in Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Laos, Lebanon, Cambodia, Panama, Haiti, Iraq, censored out?
Why won't you spend the time reading a bit about the world instead of admiring your new star spangled undies in front of the mirror?
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday May 17 2017, @01:13AM
China also never claimed to be a bastion of freedom. Their leadership is a bunch of right bastards, and they've never pretended to be anything but a bunch of right bastards.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday May 17 2017, @04:39PM
Considering the environment. Wouldn't it be way better to build a railway?
It can actually be cheaper total cost anyway.