Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday July 23 2017, @07:10AM   Printer-friendly
from the running-more-miles-to-burn-off-calories dept.

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/06/new-robotic-exosuit-could-push-the-limits-of-human-performance/

What if you could improve your average running pace from 9:14 minutes/mile to 8:49 minutes/mile without weeks of training?

Researchers at Harvard's Wyss Institute and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) at Harvard University have demonstrated that a tethered soft exosuit can reduce the metabolic cost of running on a treadmill by 5.4 percent, bringing those dreams of high performance closer to reality.

"Homo sapiens has evolved to become very good at distance running, but our results show that further improvements to this already extremely efficient system are possible," says corresponding author Philippe Malcolm, former postdoctoral research fellow at the Wyss Institute and SEAS, and now assistant professor at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, where he continues to collaborate on this work. The study [DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan6708] [DX] appears today in Science Robotics.

[...] "Our goal is to develop a portable system with a high power-to-weight ratio so that the benefit of using the suit greatly offsets the cost of wearing it. We believe this technology could augment the performance of recreational athletes and/or help with recovery after injury," adds Lee.


Original Submission

Related Stories

MacDill Matters: Iron Man Suit Out at SOCom, but New Innovations Still Needed for Commandos 21 comments

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

MacDill Matters: Iron Man suit out at SOCom, but new innovations still needed for commandos

A competition with an entry deadline of Feb. 15 seeks innovations in 12 areas, including artificial intelligence for psychological operations, improved human performance and undetectable video manipulation.

[...] Last week, James Smith, SOCom's acquisition executive, announced that the final product, known as the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit, or TALOS, would not match the initial sales pitch, according Patrick Tucker writing in Defense One.

"It's not the Iron Man. I'll be the first person to tell you that," Smith told the crowd at a key D.C. special operations forum. The exoskeleton, Smith told the audience, is "not ready for prime time in a close-combat environment."

Instead, Tucker writes, the technologies developed, including lightweight body armor and situational awareness in helmet displays, will be chunked off and used elsewhere, if wanted.

(Full disclosure: I work for tampabay.com - and normally would not submit articles from the site, however, in this case I think the technologies and decisions about how to use them discussed in the articles would be of interest to the community.)

Related: Exoskeletons in Industry
New Developments in the World of Exoskeletons
Japanese Exoskeleton Could Help Users Walk and Run, No Batteries Required
Russian Exoskeleton Suit Turns Soldiers Into Stormtroopers
Tethered, Soft Exosuit Can Reduce Metabolic Cost of Running
Turning Workers Into 'Super Workers' With Robotic Suits


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @07:40AM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @07:40AM (#543297)

    I see only the following cases:
    - You run for competition and this thing would not be allowed.
    - You run for fun and nobody cares how fast you run. Wearing this would be like riding a bicycle and showing your logged data to your friends, saying "look how fast I ran today!"
    - You run for an utilitarian purpose, and maybe it's time you left the 19th century and accept automation of tiresome tasks.
    What am I missing?

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:10AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:10AM (#543302)

      The summary mentions recovery after injury too. It's extremely frustrating to get an injury and find that all of the work you've expended building up your cardio slowly slip away because of some stupid injury. And well, think of what it would be like to have certain infantry or special forces units equipped with something of this sort. Could give a significant advantage during combat.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:32AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:32AM (#543305)

        Could give a significant advantage during combat.

        Like retreating faster.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday July 23 2017, @01:27PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 23 2017, @01:27PM (#543352) Journal

          Could give a significant advantage during combat.

          Like retreating faster.

          Not sure why this is modded funny. For that is part of the reason mobility is such a significant advantage. Hit the enemy where they are weak and avoid (say by retreating faster) where the enemy is strong is a classic tactic that the higher mobility side can do.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:34AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:34AM (#543306) Journal

      What am I missing?

      Running with your friends... with a lion on the chase?

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by kaszz on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:44AM

      by kaszz (4211) on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:44AM (#543309) Journal

      The missing application may be various service missions and space applications. People may simple lack the strength or rather spend electrical energy than more food etc.

    • (Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday July 23 2017, @06:15PM

      by frojack (1554) on Sunday July 23 2017, @06:15PM (#543420) Journal

      You are missing the fact that the reason many if not most people run us precisely to kick their metabolism's lazy ass into gear.
      Do not want.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:43AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 23 2017, @08:43AM (#543308) Journal

    I'm still waiting for my Caterpillar P-5000 loader and you are fooling around with mile runners?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Sunday July 23 2017, @10:52AM (2 children)

    by Nuke (3162) on Sunday July 23 2017, @10:52AM (#543331)

    FTFA :-

    improve your average running pace from 9:14 minutes/mile to 8:49 minutes/mile

    This thing basically adds wires between a waist belt and the thighs, that pull with actuators in addition to your muscles. And they only get that amount of improvement? Are we supposed to be amazed? Sounds like a pathetic result to me.

    I would be looking at doubling running speed with a device like that. What is the limit? Balancing issues probably, but instead the researchers go into minute detail about "metabolic cost".

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @01:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @01:58PM (#544635)

    improve your average running pace from 9:14 minutes/mile to 8:49 minutes/mile

    improve your average running pace from 5:44 minutes/km to 5:29 minutes/km

(1)