Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday October 21 2017, @02:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the Nice-Kitty!! dept.

Many different creatures have roamed the Earth over the years, and scientists now have a better idea of when saber-tooth cats were around... quite possibly at the same time as humans:

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that the saber-toothed cats shared a common ancestor with all living cat-like species about 20 million years ago. The two saber-toothed cat species under study diverged from each other about 18 million years ago.

"It's quite crazy that, in terms of their mitochondrial DNA, these two saber-toothed cats are more distant from each other than tigers are from house cats," says Johanna Paijmans at the University of Potsdam in Germany.

Paijmans and colleagues reconstructed the mitochondrial genomes from ancient-DNA samples representing three Homotherium from Europe and North America and one Smilodon specimen from South America. One of the Homotherium specimens under investigation is a unique fossil: a 28,000-year-old mandible recovered from the North Sea.

"When the first anatomically modern humans migrated to Europe, there may have been a saber-toothed cat waiting for them," Paijmans says.

Wikipedia entries on Homotherium and Smilodon.

Why do I have a sudden urge to sing the theme song to The Flintstones?

Journal Reference: Johanna L.A. Paijmans, et al. Evolutionary History of Saber-Toothed Cats Based on Ancient Mitogenomics. Current Biology, 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.033


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:04PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:04PM (#585669) Journal

    "Why do I have a sudden urge to sing the theme song to The Flintstones?"

    Or something by Cat Stevens?
    "Wild world"
    "The first cut is the deepest"
    "But i might die tonight"

    "I love my dog"

    Those crazy, crazy muslims....

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:10PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:10PM (#585672) Journal

    We had a cat, which had a litter of kittens. I wanted to look at them, and she didn't want me look at them. Arched back, fluffed tail, bared teeth. I says, "Relax, Kitty, I'm just going to eat a couple of them." Well, Kitty promised me that if I ate any of her kittens, she would come back and eat ALL of my babies. I laughed at her, until she reminded me about mountain lions, and saber toothed cats.

    I just withdrew my hands, and found other business to attend to.

    Only reason cats gave up those big saber teeth is, they domesticated us humans. Today's housecat is a direct descendant of the saber tooth.

    Don't take some scientist's word for it - my cat told me of herstory. (and no, herstory never did refer to human women's versions of history, herstory was always about the cats)

  • (Score: 2) by KiloByte on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:10PM

    by KiloByte (375) on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:10PM (#585689)

    What happened seems rather obvious to me: if a human fails to deliver food on time, the kitteh responds with a gradual series of reminders, which escalate if the human doesn't act appropriately. The list of reminders includes, at some point, a bite. But here's the difference: while a bite from a housecat can mean a trip to the first aid kit, a bite from a sabretooth is likely to permanently stop that human's food-providing abilities.

    Thus, this explains both the bottleneck of human population at the time, and extinction of sabretooths. Only after natural selection turned kittehs into a less vicious variant that lords over us today, human population could rebound.

    --
    Ceterum censeo systemd esse delendam.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:14PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:14PM (#585690)

    The data suggest [...] It's quite crazy that

    It is clear that they do really not believe the data only "suggests" their conclusion. They just put the word in there to seem more scientific.

    • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:36PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @04:36PM (#585693)

      publish or perish aka fake science

    • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Saturday October 21 2017, @06:24PM

      by t-3 (4907) on Saturday October 21 2017, @06:24PM (#585731)

      I believe the "suggest" is referring to sharing a common ancestor with modern cats around 20 million years ago.

  • (Score: 2) by aliks on Saturday October 21 2017, @08:07PM

    by aliks (357) on Saturday October 21 2017, @08:07PM (#585759)

    . . . and die out fast.

    Apparently there have been many species of cats which evolved into apex predators. Generally these were physically large, highly specialised hunters, dependent on particular habitat/prey and needing a large territory to survive. Of course, when the climate changed, they were restricted to smaller and smaller areas, and quickly died out.

    I am not a biologist - my source is a Bradt guide to East African Wildlife by Philip Briggs.

    From this point of view, its not so hard to see why different species of sabre-tooth diverged so much.

    --
    To err is human, to comment divine
(1)