Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday December 01 2017, @08:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the cloud-has-a-leak dept.

A contractor misconfigured an Amazon Web Services storage "bucket", exposing top secret information from the U.S. Army's Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM):

UpGuard's director of cyber risk research, Chris Vickery, discovered the publicly accessible S3 storage "bucket" on September 27 in the AWS subdomain "inscom." INSCOM is the US Army's Intelligence and Security Command, the Army's internal operational intelligence branch based at Fort Belvoir in Virginia. INSCOM is also integrated into the National Security Agency's Central Security Service—connecting the Army's signals intelligence operations to the NSA.

The public bucket was accessible via the Web and had "47 viewable files and folders in the main repository, three of which were also downloadable," UpGuard reported in a blog post today. The largest downloadable file was an Open Virtual Appliance file named "ssdev.ova," which contained a virtual hard drive and configuration data for a Red Hat Linux-based virtual machine. "While the virtual OS and HD can be browsed in their functional states, most of the data cannot be accessed without connecting to Pentagon systems—an intrusion that malicious actors could have attempted had they found this bucket," UpGuard's research team noted.

Still, the contents of the virtual hard drive itself were highly sensitive. Some of the files were marked as "Top Secret/NOFORN"—meaning that they were not to be shared even with US allies. Metadata on the virtual drive shows that "the box was worked on in some capacity by a now-defunct third-party defense contractor named Invertix, a known INSCOM partner," including private encryption keys used for hashed passwords and for accessing DCGS that belonged to Invertix system administrators.

Also at Techdirt, TechCrunch, and The Next Web.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @09:12AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @09:12AM (#603841)

    This is especially true of a monopoly that arises by the barrel of a gun, rather than by profitable business.

    You know what the NSA/Army needed? MORE MONEY! That's all they were missing; they just didn't have enough money to do it right.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Friday December 01 2017, @06:57PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday December 01 2017, @06:57PM (#604004) Journal

      This is especially true of a monopoly that arises by the barrel of a gun, rather than by profitable business.

      Damn, I heard Amazon's Jeff Bezos is a tough negotiator but damn!

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Friday December 01 2017, @10:52AM (1 child)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Friday December 01 2017, @10:52AM (#603856)

    Even my company, which is a small company in the middle of nowhere important, and a pure Windows outfit full of MCSE-holding halfwits, isn't all that keen on giving into the whole cloud concept and turning control over company data and applications over some unaccountable provider halfway across the intarweb. You'd think the NSA and the US army would know better...

    • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Friday December 01 2017, @12:29PM

      by Gaaark (41) on Friday December 01 2017, @12:29PM (#603867) Journal

      "You'd think the NSA and the US army would know better..."

      Yes! Yes you would.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @12:55PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @12:55PM (#603873)

    Misread "Top Secret/NOFORN" as "Top Secret/NOPORN", yeah.... that would have helped. ;-)

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @03:17PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @03:17PM (#603925)

      Doesn't NOFORN mean "NO FORNICATING KIDDING!"?

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by looorg on Friday December 01 2017, @01:04PM (4 children)

    by looorg (578) on Friday December 01 2017, @01:04PM (#603875)

    Isn't the first lesson at spook school to cover your tracks and not leave sensitive materials out and about?

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Friday December 01 2017, @01:23PM (2 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday December 01 2017, @01:23PM (#603883) Journal

      Mistakes are the greatest learning experience.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by looorg on Friday December 01 2017, @02:25PM

        by looorg (578) on Friday December 01 2017, @02:25PM (#603891)

        True. But you normally prefer to learn from your small mistakes and not the large epic once.

      • (Score: 2) by edIII on Friday December 01 2017, @07:31PM

        by edIII (791) on Friday December 01 2017, @07:31PM (#604011)

        Normally though that results in a star on the wall, not epic level fuckups with top secret data.

        --
        Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:44PM (#603903)

      Except they only teach offense these days... NSA policy.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @01:18PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @01:18PM (#603881)

    Lock Her ...

    Wait, nevermind. I just got a little triggered for a second.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:39PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:39PM (#603898)

      If they find a lowly guy to blame for this, they may well lock him up.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by bob_super on Friday December 01 2017, @07:55PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Friday December 01 2017, @07:55PM (#604015)

        You have to hope for the person who transferred classified data to AWS, that (s)he kept a hard copy of the order to do so.

        When I was supporting military suppliers, they couldn't even have classified discussions with us in their own building. Now we have classified info being piped to random servers which could get duplicated or moved anywhere in the world...

  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @02:52PM (#603910)

    You can't be too careful in keeping the secure stuff behind the firewall.

    It would be interesting to see what logic allowed it to be outside.
    Maybe the same at that controlling seamanship in the Navy.
    That is, focus on mission prevented focus on reality.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Friday December 01 2017, @04:40PM (5 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Friday December 01 2017, @04:40PM (#603955) Homepage Journal

    "... we have to wait six months for an expert to fly out from Washington, then wait another month until he blesses it."

    The Hell is classified information doing on a server in an unsecured data center? What if one of the employees stole the box then sold it to the Soviets... er... ah... I mean the Russian Federation.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Geezer on Friday December 01 2017, @05:44PM (2 children)

      by Geezer (511) on Friday December 01 2017, @05:44PM (#603979)

      One way or another somebody will find some kind of Russia angle to all this, and the media will go apeshit.

      Maybe somebody at Amazon uses Kaspersky or listens to Borodin.

      Nothing sells papers/clicks like "Teh Rushins dood it!!!1!!1!

      • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @06:26PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 01 2017, @06:26PM (#603992)

        Not to mention triggering old farts before the stories even run!

      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday December 02 2017, @06:47AM

        by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday December 02 2017, @06:47AM (#604151) Journal

        You mean, it might turn out that Bezos is actually a Russian? Did anyone check his birth certificate? ;-)

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 5, Informative) by edIII on Friday December 01 2017, @07:55PM (1 child)

      by edIII (791) on Friday December 01 2017, @07:55PM (#604016)

      Actually, the data center was likely very well guarded. Most of I've been too have extreme physical security. To get into a place where I was sysadmin'n, I went through the following steps:

      1. Drove to a veritable fortress. Completely surrounded by 15ft walls with what looked like glass spikes lining the top.
      2. Biometric panel where I authenticated into the system, spoke with a guard, and then watched as a massive steel gate opened up.
      3. Drove into a protected courtyard. Curiously, completely absent of anybody. Ghost town.
      4. Walked up to a non-descript steel door that looked like it could repel SWAT.
      5. 2nd Biometric verification
      6. Walk into at least a 2ft cement & steel mantrap with armored bullet resistant windows with at least two guards behind in a control booth.
      7. Drop my drivers license through a depression in the counter. (about the only security weakness I saw)
      8. Watch as the guards pull up my file, which is conveniently displayed on 70" display screens behind the guards. They match it against my DL.
      9. Proceed through a full height turnstyle gate. If I needed to bring in equipment, they open a special door from within and roll out cart for me to use. Escort me to my vehicle too to get the equipment. Worth noting, that I need to tell them I'm bringing in equipment, OR removing equipment before it is allowed. That is verified with the top level account owner, so a lowly sysadmin can't even bring a 1U server out without a security incident
      10. Proceed down several hallways and biometrically authenticate to my own section.
      11. Biometric access panel on my own cage
      12. Now I'm standing in front of servers I need to work on.

      The guards all seemed to be those wonderfully stable ex-military types from Afghanistan/Iraq/{HellHole} that have no problems whatsoever laying their hands on their weapons at their hips while asking you to put the equipment back down. Seriously, they're all well armed and not shy about telling you what to do at the point of a gun. Rubbed a lot of sysadmins the wrong way, but that's another story.

      Physical security is most likely not the problem. Cyberspace is the problem, combined with piss poor sysadmin work. The odds of me getting my hands on an U.S Air force server and getting out of that building without being shot is very low. There was an incident were a bunch of thugs tried storming a less well protected data center, and before they could get through the 2nd door of the mantrap, found themselves face to face with ex-military holding semi-auto assault rifles on them.

      That being said, some kid in a basement can apparently "hack" top secret data because it's been made public in a cloud provider that has ZERO business serving the government. What complete utter moronic shit. If Amazon was better at making and managing a platform than the government (most likely true), then they should run a special one just for the government that is absolutely separate from the rest of Amazon.

      This was the equivalent of a teenager taking out the Death Star.

      --
      Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(1)