Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday February 18 2018, @08:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the there-was-no-life-on-Earth-before-there-was-O2? dept.

The presence of large quantities of oxygen ions may be able to distinguish habitable exoplanets with life from barren exoplanets in the habitable zone (resembling Venus or Mars):

Like Earth, Venus and Mars are small rocky planets; they have permanent atmospheres like Earth, and their atmospheres are exposed to the same solar radiation as Earth's. Data from the Pioneer Venus Orbiter and the Viking descent probe on Mars show that they have very similar ionospheres to each other—which don't contain a lot of atomic O+ ions. Know what else Venus and Mars are missing? Photosynthesis.

[Astronomy PhD candidate Paul] Dalba's contention is that photosynthesis on a planet's surface, which generates a surfeit of molecular oxygen, is the only thing that can account for these atomic O+ ions in a planet's ionosphere. The mere existence of life throws a planet's atmosphere out of chemical balance. O+ would be a neat biomarker because there isn't a numerical cutoff required—just the dominance of O+ among the ionic species in the upper atmosphere would indicate "thriving global biological activity" on the planet below.

Dalba claims that Venus and Mars act as negative controls, demonstrating that planets like Earth but lacking life don't have this O+ layer. Some may think that continuous volcanic activity on the surface could also generate enough oxygen, but Dalba doesn't. Chemistry involving water and UV light [open, DOI: 10.1038/srep13977] [DX] can also release oxygen. But the amount of water on Earth is insufficient to account for the requisite oxygen content, so he thinks that the presence of water on other planets wouldn't make enough oxygen there either.

Atomic oxygen ions as ionospheric biomarkers on exoplanets (DOI: 10.1038/s41550-017-0375-y) (DX)

Related: Nitrogen in Ancient Rocks a Sign of Early Life
Oxygen Ions From Earth Escape to the Moon
Researchers Suffocate Hopes of Life Support in Red Dwarf "Habitable Zones"
Seven Earth-Sized Exoplanets, Including Three Potentially Habitable, Identified Around TRAPPIST-1
Cosmic Methyl Chloride Detection Complicates the Search for Life on Exoplanets
Mars Colonists Could Produce Oxygen by Making a Plasma Out of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
Analysis of Microfossils Finds that Microbial Life Existed at Least 3.5 Billion Years Ago
To Detect Life on Other Planets, Look for Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and an Absence of Carbon Monoxide


Original Submission

Related Stories

Nitrogen in Ancient Rocks a Sign of Early Life 2 comments

Nitrogen is one of the essential nutrients of life on Earth, with some organisms, such as the kinds of microbes found within the roots of legume plants, capable of converting nitrogen gas into molecules that other species can use.

Nitrogen fixation, as the process is called, involves breaking the powerful chemical bonds that hold nitrogen atoms in pairs in the atmosphere and using the resulting single nitrogen atoms to help create molecules such as ammonia, which is a building block of many complex organic molecules, such as proteins, DNA and RNA.

With organisms playing such a crucial role in the chemistry of nitrogen on Earth, scientists are examining nitrogen in billion-year-old rocks to decipher its potential as a bio-signature of life on other planets. New findings in this area of research appeared recently in the paper, "Nitrogen in Ancient Mud: A Biosignature?" in the journal Astrobiology.

"This study identifies nitrogen abundances as a potential tool to detect remnants of life on Mars," said one of the study's authors, Eva Stüeken, an astrobiologist at the University of Washington at Seattle and the University of California at Riverside.


Original Submission

Oxygen Ions From Earth Escape to the Moon 11 comments

Oxygen ions from Earth are periodically transferred to the lunar surface, according to a new study:

A small bit of Earth's air leaks into space each day. (Don't worry, it's only about 90 metric tons out of a total of about 5 quadrillion metric tons.) Some atoms and molecules near the top of our atmosphere are simply moving so fast they overcome Earth's gravitational tug. Charged particles can be accelerated to even higher speed by our planet's magnetic field. Once these émigrés escape our world, they remain inside a teardrop-shaped region of space surrounding Earth called the magnetosphere (whose rounded end is pointed toward the sun) and are eventually blown away from the sun by the solar wind and into interplanetary space.

For the largest part of each month, the moon is bombarded with high-speed, highly charged atoms spewing from the sun and carried by the solar wind. But for 5 days every month, Earth's magnetosphere passes over the moon, shielding it from the solar particles and allowing slower speed particles from Earth to take their place, says Kentaro Terada, a cosmochemist at Osaka University in Toyonaka, Japan. Moon-orbiting probes experience the same conditions, he notes.

[...] During each burst of oxygen, an estimated 26,000 ions per second passed through each square centimeter of [the Kaguya moon-orbiting probe's] sensor, the researchers say. [...] Those atoms' origin in the ozone layer might also help explain a longstanding mystery about some grains of lunar soil brought back by Apollo astronauts. A few of those grains sport higher-than-normal proportions of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18 isotopes (as compared with the universe's predominant form of the element, oxygen-16). Notably, Terada and his colleagues say, previous studies have shown that the overall proportions of oxygen isotopes in the ozone layer also are skewed toward above-average concentrations of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18.

Biogenic oxygen from Earth transported to the Moon by a wind of magnetospheric ions (open, DOI: 10.1038/s41550-016-0026) (DX)


Original Submission

Researchers Suffocate Hopes of Life Support in Red Dwarf "Habitable Zones" 2 comments

Astrophysicists have modeled the effects of red dwarf star flare activity on the atmospheres of orbiting exoplanets, and found that heavy gases including oxygen would be lost quickly, even in the so-called "habitable zone":

[When] the scientists accounted for superflares, their new model indicates the violent storms of young red dwarfs generate enough high-energy radiation to enable the escape of even oxygen and nitrogen – building blocks for life's essential molecules.

"The more X-ray and extreme ultraviolet energy there is, the more electrons are generated and the stronger the ion escape effect becomes," Glocer said. "This effect is very sensitive to the amount of energy the star emits, which means it must play a strong role in determining what is and is not a habitable planet."

Considering oxygen escape alone, the model estimates a young red dwarf could render a close-in exoplanet uninhabitable within a few tens to a hundred million years. The loss of both atmospheric hydrogen and oxygen would reduce and eliminate the planet's water supply before life would have a chance to develop.

"The results of this work could have profound implications for the atmospheric chemistry of these worlds," said Shawn Domagal-Goldman, a Goddard space scientist not involved with the study. "The team's conclusions will impact our ongoing studies of missions that would search for signs of life in the chemical composition of those atmospheres."

The research has obvious implications for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b.

YouTube video (20 seconds).

How Hospitable Are Space Weather Affected Habitable Zones? The Role of Ion Escape (DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/L3) (DX)


Original Submission

Seven Earth-Sized Exoplanets, Including Three Potentially Habitable, Identified Around TRAPPIST-1 41 comments

Astronomers have observed enough planetary transits to confirm the existence of seven "Earth-sized" exoplanets orbiting TRAPPIST-1, an ultra-cool (~2550 K) red dwarf star about 39.5 light years away. Three of the exoplanets are located inside the "habitable zone" of their parent star. These three orbit from 0.028 to 0.045 AU away from the star:

Astronomers using the TRAPPIST–South telescope at ESO's La Silla Observatory, the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at Paranal and the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope, as well as other telescopes around the world, have now confirmed the existence of at least seven small planets orbiting the cool red dwarf star TRAPPIST-1. All the planets, labelled TRAPPIST-1b, c, d, e, f, g and h in order of increasing distance from their parent star, have sizes similar to Earth.

The exoplanets are presumed to be tidally locked. The six closest to TRAPPIST-1 have been determined to be rocky, while the seventh, TRAPPIST-1h, requires additional observations to determine its characteristics due to its longer orbital period.

Mass estimates for the planets range from 0.41 Earth masses (M) to 1.38 M. Radii range from 0.76 Earth radii (R) to 1.13 R.

Spitzer, Hubble, and other telescopes will continue to make observations of the TRAPPIST-1 planetary system, but the best data will likely come from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which is scheduled to launch in late 2018. JWST will allow the atmospheres and temperatures of many exoplanets to be characterized, which will help to settle whether the "habitable zones" of red dwarf stars are actually hospitable.

Artist illustrations and data for the TRAPPIST-1 system compared to Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth.

Here's a website dedicated to the star.

Seven temperate terrestrial planets around the nearby ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1 (DOI: 10.1038/nature21360) (DX)


Original Submission

Cosmic Methyl Chloride Detection Complicates the Search for Life on Exoplanets 5 comments

A "biomarker" molecule presumed to indicate the presence of industrial or biological activity has been found to be naturally occurring in interstellar clouds:

A molecule once thought to be a useful marker for life as we know it has been discovered around a young star and at a comet for the first time, suggesting these ingredients are inherited during the planet-forming phase.

The discovery of methyl chloride was made by the ground-based Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, and by ESA's Rosetta spacecraft following Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. It is the simplest member of a class of molecules known as organohalogens, which contain halogens, such as chlorine or fluorine, bonded with carbon.

Methyl chloride is well known on Earth as being used in industry. It is also produced naturally by biological and geological activity: it is the most abundant organohalogen in Earth's atmosphere, with up to three megatonnes produced a year, primarily from biological processes.

As such, it had been identified as a possible 'biomarker' in the search for life at exoplanets. This has been called into question, however, now it is seen in environments not derived from living organisms, and instead as a raw ingredient from which planets could eventually form.

This is also the first time an organohalogen has been detected in space, indicating that halogen- and carbon-centred chemistries are more intertwined than previously thought.

Also at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Protostellar and cometary detections of organohalogens (open, DOI: 10.1038/s41550-017-0237-7) (DX)


Original Submission

Mars Colonists Could Produce Oxygen by Making a Plasma Out of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide 34 comments

Mars colonists could create a carbon dioxide plasma in order to supply oxygen to their settlement(s):

The atmosphere on Mars is 96 per cent carbon dioxide, says Vasco Guerra at the University of Lisbon in Portugal. This can be split to extract breathable oxygen and carbon monoxide, a fuel that could give us a "gas station on the Red Planet", he says. He and his team calculate that creating a carbon dioxide plasma — a mush of ions made by passing an electric current through a gas — could split carbon dioxide from oxygen more easily on Mars than on Earth.

The lower atmospheric pressure on Mars would allow us to create plasmas without the vacuum pumps or compressors necessary on Earth. Also, the temperature of around -60°C is just right to let the plasma more easily break one of the chemical bonds that keeps carbon and oxygen tightly bound, while preventing the carbon dioxide from re-forming.

For now, this is largely theoretical, but they say such a system needing only 150 to 200 Watts for 4 hours each 25-hour Mars day could produce 8 to 16 kilograms of oxygen. "The International Space Station currently consumes oxygen in the range of 2 to 5 kilograms per day, so this would be enough to support a small settlement," says Guerra.

The case for in situ resource utilisation for oxygen production on Mars by nonequilibrium plasmas (open, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595) (DX)


Original Submission

Analysis of Microfossils Finds that Microbial Life Existed at Least 3.5 Billion Years Ago 10 comments

According to a new fossil analysis, previously described Australian fossils do contain evidence of 3.5-billion-year-old microbial life. However, the complexity of the fossilized microbes suggests that life arose much earlier, possibly as far back as 4 billion years ago:

In 1992, researchers discovered evidence of what was then potentially the earliest life on Earth: 3.5-billion-year-old microscopic squiggles encased in Australian rocks. Since then, however, scientists have debated whether these imprints truly represent ancient microorganisms, and even if they do, whether they're really that old. Now, a comprehensive analysis of these microfossils suggests that these formations do indeed represent ancient microbes, ones potentially so complex that life on our planet must have originated some 500 million years earlier.

The new work indicates these early microorganisms were surprisingly sophisticated, capable of photosynthesis and of using other chemical processes to get energy, says Birger Rasmussen, a geobiologist at Curtin University in Perth, Australia, who was not involved with the work. The study "will probably touch off a flurry of new research into these rocks as other researchers look for data that either support or disprove this new assertion," adds Alison Olcott Marshall, a geobiologist at the University of Kansas in Lawrence who was not involved in the effort.

[...] The analysis detected several distinct carbon ratios in the material [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718063115] [DX], Schopf, Valley, and colleagues report today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Two types of microfossils had the same carbon ratio as modern bacteria that use light to make carbon compounds that fuel their activities—a primitive photosynthesis that did not involve oxygen. Two other types of microfossils had the same carbon ratios as microbes known as archaea that depend on methane as their energy source—and that played a pivotal role in the development of multicellular life. The ratio of a final type of microfossil indicated that this organism produced methane as part of its metabolism.

That there are so many different carbon ratios strengthens the case that these are real fossils, Schopf says. Any inorganic processes that could have created the squiggles would be expected to leave a uniform carbon ratio signature, he says. The fact that microbes were already so diverse at this point in Earth's history also suggests that life on our planet may date back to 4 billion years ago, he says. Other researchers have found signs of life dating back at least that far, but those findings are even more controversial than Schopf's.

Also at University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Previously: Ancient Rocks Record First Evidence for Photosynthesis That Made Oxygen
3.7 Billion-Year-Old Fossil Found
Oldest Evidence of Life on Earth Found in 3.77-4.28 Billion Year Old Fossils
Earliest Known Evidence for Microbial Life on Land: 3.48 Billion Years Old


Original Submission

To Detect Life on Other Planets, Look for Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and an Absence of Carbon Monoxide 12 comments

A new study suggests a biosignature that the James Webb Space Telescope could search for:

The new study looks at the history of life on Earth, the one inhabited planet we know, to find times where the planet's atmosphere contained a mixture of gases that are out of equilibrium and could exist only in the presence of living organisms — anything from pond scum to giant redwoods. In fact, life's ability to make large amounts of oxygen has only occurred in the past one-eighth of Earth's history.

By taking a longer view, the researchers identified a new combination of gases that would provide evidence of life: methane plus carbon dioxide, minus carbon monoxide.

"We need to look for fairly abundant methane and carbon dioxide on a world that has liquid water at its surface, and find an absence of carbon monoxide," said co-author David Catling, a UW professor of Earth and space sciences. "Our study shows that this combination would be a compelling sign of life. What's exciting is that our suggestion is doable, and may lead to the historic discovery of an extraterrestrial biosphere in the not-too-distant future."

Also at Popular Mechanics.

Disequilibrium biosignatures over Earth history and implications for detecting exoplanet life (open, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5747) (DX)


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1) by tftp on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:06PM (7 children)

    by tftp (806) on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:06PM (#639841) Homepage

    I'm still surprised: why are they searching for Earth-like life? This one went further: he declared that photosynthesis must be one and the only reason for existence of oxygen in atmosphere. He rejected the proposed alternatives only because they do not provide sufficient effect on Earth!

    I wouldn't be too surprised if we find out that Earth-like conditions are uncommon. There is no obvious reason why all life should be like ours. Even our own life can change into something else once we reach technological singularity. Or even before - we can have whole cities under the soil of Moon and Mars without polluting their atmosphere with oxygen. Of course, astronomers want to do something, but it would be nice if that "something" is useful.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:26PM (#639852)

      why are they searching for Earth-like life?

      Because it's the only life we know.
      Also, we're not, e.g. SETI is searching for any radio-emissions-using life.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:46PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:46PM (#639861) Journal

      We're searching for Earth-like life because it's easier to look for something we can recognize. We already know that it can exist in Earth-like conditions (liquid water, source of heat, etc.).

      What these astronomers are doing is useful, because assuming the launch and deployment succeeds, the JWST will be up and running in a year or two, providing better data about exoplanet atmospheres than we've ever had. If we find multiple presumed biomarkers in the atmosphere of a potentially habitable exoplanet, then that will be a good sign that we've found an exoplanet that needs to be studied closely.

      Oh, and cities under the soil don't matter because the point is to look for obvious surface microbes or vegetation, which you probably won't find on an exoplanet that looks like Mars today. No underground oceans either because you probably need to drill, or at least land there or sample water plumes to confirm life.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:54PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 18 2018, @11:54PM (#639867)

      There is no obvious reason why all life should be like ours.

      Look at the reaction the human has to other humans of different skin colours.
      Do you really think that life-unlike-ours will be classified as life?

      • (Score: 2, Insightful) by tftp on Monday February 19 2018, @12:08AM

        by tftp (806) on Monday February 19 2018, @12:08AM (#639876) Homepage
        If you ask a scientist - yes. We already have plenty of life on Earth that doesn't look like us. I don't mean machine intelligence because we are not quite there yet. Just bacteria and viruses.
      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by requerdanos on Monday February 19 2018, @01:10AM

        by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 19 2018, @01:10AM (#639895) Journal

        There's a relevant passage from Michael Crichton's 1969 novel "The Andromeda Strain [michaelcrichton.com]":

             The group had finally concluded that energy conversion was the hallmark of life. All living organisms in someway took in energy- as food, or sunlight-and converted it to another form of energy, and put it to use. (Viruses were the exception to this rule, but the group was prepared to define viruses as nonliving.)
             For the next meeting, Leavitt was asked to prepare a rebuttal to the definition. He pondered it for a week, and returned with three objects: a swatch of black cloth, a watch, and a piece of granite. He set them down before the group and said, "Gentleman, I give you three living things."
             He then challenged the team to prove that they were not living. He placed the black cloth in the sunlight; it became warm. This, he announced, was an example of energy conversion- radiant energy to heat.
             It was objected that this was merely passive energy absorption, not conversion. It was also objected that the conversion, if it could be called that, was not purposeful. It served no function.
             "How do you know it is not purposeful?" Leavitt had demanded.
             They then turned to the watch. Leavitt pointed to the radium dial, which glowed in the dark. Decay was taking place, and light was being produced.
             The men argued that this was merely release of potential energy held in unstable electron levels. But there was growing confusion; Leavitt was making his point.
             Finally, they came to the granite. "This is alive," Leavitt said. "It is living, breathing, walking, and talking. Only we cannot see it, because it is happening too slowly. Rock has a lifespan of three billion years. We have a lifespan of sixty or seventy years. We cannot see what is happening to this rock for the same reason that we cannot make out the tune on a record being played at the rate of one revolution every century. And the rock, for its part, is not even aware of our existence because we are alive for only a brief instant of its lifespan. To it, we are like flashes in the dark."

        His commentary through his characters' voices has aged pretty well, considering that it's almost 50 years old.

        It has flaws and is imperfect, but so too do our definitions of life have flaws and are imperfect.

        Here, they are confronted with the difficult question of whether virii are life, and today we're past virii (without resolution) and now wondering whether prions are life, given that they are just chemicals (until you notice that they know how to operate DNA).

        I believe that we will with alien life that misses our definition treat it like we often treat the virus: As a special exception that's definitely life, even though we can't say why, because we know it when we see it. I don't think that while-vs-light brown-vs-dark brown skin will be an issue in that area.

        Of course, after the alien life is declared to be "life" or even "sentient life" should the case arise, that doesn't mean that killing them to steal their possessions and sell them to make a fortune, for example, or enslaving them to do man's bidding, will necessarily be automatically illegal nor even automatically condemned. Sigh.

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Arik on Monday February 19 2018, @01:13AM

      by Arik (4543) on Monday February 19 2018, @01:13AM (#639897) Journal
      No, there's no obvious reason why all life should be like ours, necessarily, but the closer it is to what we're familiar with, the more likely we are to be able to detect it.

      And, conversely, there's also no obvious a priori reason why our circumstances should be exceptional either.

      So it  seems like a fine assumption to start from. It points out potentially useful lines of inquiry, and if those turn out to prove it wrong, well, that's how science works.

      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 19 2018, @04:19PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 19 2018, @04:19PM (#640129)

      I'm still surprised: why are they searching for Earth-like life?

      Because it's the only form of life we know. We cannot search for forms of life we don't know since we don't know what to search for. Earth-like life is the only form of life we have a realistic chance to detect.

      It's like asking why do you look for a certain information in English-language texts, not in Chinese-language texts (assuming you speak English, but not Chinese)? The answer is not that you'd know in advance that the information cannot be found in Chinese language texts; it may very well be there, and it is entirely possible that it only is found in Chinese-language texts. But searching in Chinese-language texts would be pointless for you, because you couldn't identify the information in those texts anyway, even if it were right under your nose.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by requerdanos on Monday February 19 2018, @12:40AM (2 children)

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 19 2018, @12:40AM (#639887) Journal

    barren exoplanets in the habitable zone (resembling Venus or Mars)

    But now that we've sent non- or incompletely-sterilized [stackexchange.com] spacecraft and equipment to those planets, to Venus occasionally and to Mars a little more frequently, they both stand a good chance of no longer being barren.

    Horrifying in one way (contamination!) and pretty cool in another (Life finds a way!).

    It might seem silly to keep looking for things that "Earth Life" produces or needs (water, and now O+) but it's hard to get away from the fact that all planets known to have developed life have them and all planets known to not have life either don't have them or have them in a different mix and/or temperature and/or pressure range. So perhaps we're not really saying "life must have these things," but rather "I dunno what life must have, but if we see these things, there's probably some life around somewhere."

  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 19 2018, @01:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 19 2018, @01:54AM (#639909)

    Know what else Venus and Mars are missing?

    Good Thai food.

(1)