Chris Sevier, a man who once tried to marry his laptop to make a point against same-sex marriage, has been promoting legislation that would require ISPs to block "sexual content and/or patently offensive material." The block could only be lifted if a user makes a request in writing to the ISP and pays a one-time fee of $20. An "Internet digital blocking" bill will be heard by the Rhode Island Senate on the 27th. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, two dozen similar bills have been introduced in 18 state legislatures this year.
Sevier refers to the legislation on his website and elsewhere with names such as the "Understanding the Human Trafficking And Child Exploitation Prevention Act", "Human Trafficking Prevention Act" (HTPA), "Children's Online Filtering Act", or "Elizabeth Smart Law". Elizabeth Smart was kidnapped in 2002 and raped repeatedly during a span of nine months. While she has since become an activist on behalf of legislation related to human trafficking and child sexual abuse, Smart has sent Sevier a cease-and-desist letter related to the use of her name to promote the porn blocking legislation.
The National Center on Sexual Exploitation, an anti-pornography group, opposes incarnations of the legislation due to their vague language, First Amendment concerns, and Sevier's false claims that the organization supports or has authored the legislation:
The bill (sans resolution language) was developed by Chris Sevier, also known as Chris Severe. We have had a difficult relationship with Mr. Sevier over the last several years, to say the least. We have not found him trustworthy in our past dealings and therefore cannot rely on his assertions that those groups and those legislators that he claims are supporters of HTPA are actually in support. That is because, in the past, Sevier has falsely represented that our organization and NCOSE President Patrick Trueman and NCOSE Executive Director Dawn Hawkins are in support of his work. We have demanded that Sevier stop using our names.
In 2015, the office of a United States Senator alerted us to the fact that Sevier was promoting a version of the HTPA at the U. S. Capitol and was representing to U. S. Senate offices that Patrick Trueman was an author of the bill. This was false. A key legal assistant with that senator's office also said that Sevier was visiting other senate offices claiming that his boss, the senator, was supporting the legislation, which was also false.
Several organizations have contacted us over the past couple years to complain that Sevier was also using their names without authorization and some of those organizations have complained that he was threatening them with legal sanctions when they refused to support him and his work.
And for a little more about Chris Sevier's legal shenanigans, you can check out this TMZ article.
Previously: States Introduce Dubious Anti-Pornography Legislation to Ransom the Internet
Related Stories
More than a dozen state legislatures are considering a bill called the "Human Trafficking Prevention Act," which has nothing to do with human trafficking and all to do with one man's crusade against pornography at the expense of free speech.
At its heart, the model bill would require device manufacturers to pre-install "obscenity" filters on devices like cell phones, tablets, and computers. Consumers would be forced to pony up $20 per device in order to surf the Internet without state censorship. The legislation is not only technologically unworkable, it violates the First Amendment and significantly burdens consumers and businesses.
Perhaps more shocking is the bill's provenance. The driving force behind the legislation is a man named Mark Sevier, who has been using the alias "Chris Severe" to contact legislators. According to the Daily Beast, Sevier is a disbarred attorney who has sued major tech companies, blaming them for his pornography addiction, and sued states for the right to marry his laptop. Reporters Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny uncovered a lengthy legal history for Sevier, including an open arrest warrant and stalking convictions, as well as evidence that Sevier misrepresented his own experience working with anti-trafficking non-profits.
(Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:14PM (6 children)
You say that like it's a bad thing.
Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
(Score: 5, Funny) by LoRdTAW on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:59PM (5 children)
Not if it's a fucking Macbook. Disgusting.
(Score: 3, Touché) by c0lo on Wednesday March 28 2018, @03:27PM (3 children)
Now, now, so hasty to judge... what if his equipment fits only in Apple's connectors, what do you want the poor man do in his constitutional guaranteed pursuit of happiness, ey?
(grin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:26PM (2 children)
But their lightningport connector only fits in my iPhone 7
It doesn't even fit in my Mac mini
Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
(Score: 3, Touché) by c0lo on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:32PM
So? What's the problem?
Don't marry them and that's the end of it!
(grin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:30PM
Can a doctor possibly help find a suitable prescription lubrication?
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 3, Funny) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:28PM
It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve (Jobs)!
(Score: 4, Funny) by c0lo on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:15PM (3 children)
"Porn Blocking Bill Gates Hearing in Rhode Island Senate."
Something is wrong there, I should have gone to specsavers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by Virindi on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:20PM
I also read that initially :)
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:02PM
Didn't you listen to your parents? "Too much porn will gate your hearing"
(Score: 2) by jasassin on Wednesday March 28 2018, @08:58PM
How come the Rhode Island Senate is blocking their porn from Bill Gates?
jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
(Score: 2) by Virindi on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:18PM (3 children)
Seems like this kind of thing is introduced all the time and gets nowhere. As in, perhaps the sponsors know it will go nowhere, but they want to be able to go back home and claim "we tried!"
They are surely not stupid enough to think it would pass Constitutional muster anyway. But that doesn't matter if it is all for show.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:27PM
"I stand for good Christian morals! Its those filthy miscreants from party $X that made this fail."
I would agree that its ignorable impossible to pass stuff from a state that doesn't matter; except that sometimes these bills end up getting passed.
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:55PM
The atmosphere - you might say the smell - from the capital changes periodically. That is, the national, as well as the state capital. Just because you couldn't get a bill passed in any year from 1900 through 2017, doesn't mean you can't get it passed in 2018. All that might be required is, one old diehard has croaked, and some young fool sees this as the time to make a name for himself. Offer to allow him to put his name on the bill, and it's passed.
(Score: 2) by Fluffeh on Wednesday March 28 2018, @09:21PM
I say let it pass. I've always been interested in seeing how many milliseconds it would take to reverse something as stupid as this once it hits the public sphere. I get that it's for the "We tried..." aspect - but it wouldn't it be grand if just for once, one of these bullshit "We tried..." bills got through and the people introducing it would have to live (at least temporarily) with the consequences of their special stupid.
(Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:30PM
You know when the person a bill is named for wants nothing to do with it, the bill is pure rhetoric bullshit.
And if an anti-pornography group can't even support an anti-pornography bill, well...
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 3, Interesting) by fadrian on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:40PM (29 children)
If it's happening in that many states, it has to be ALEC [wikipedia.org].
Why do conservatives hate porn? Is it just to try to keep the Xians in the fold or is it because they're all closeted? Quite the coup for the small government R's.
That is all.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by rigrig on Wednesday March 28 2018, @02:51PM
They don't hate porn, their ISP buddies would like to charge extra for it:
Obviously "a request in writing and a one-time fee of $20" is going to far, so they'll "compromise" on just the one-time fee.
No one remembers the singer.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Justin Case on Wednesday March 28 2018, @03:19PM (1 child)
They don't want little Johnny and Mary to find out what really happens. It is hard to sell the "God made you" bullshit to someone who has seen the truth.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:07PM
Mais non, c'est pas difficile. "Monseigneur Vingt-Trois [wikipedia.org] a trois papas [wikipedia.org]"; ce la est la vérité de l'église catholique.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2, Flamebait) by Justin Case on Wednesday March 28 2018, @03:46PM (18 children)
OK now it's my turn: Why do politically correct lefties hate porn?
Because you might discover that there really is a difference between men and women -- not just shape, but behavior!
What's more, you might see a woman turn the camera on herself and obviously experience great delight knowing you are watching. Now how can we play the "exploited victim" card?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:29PM (16 children)
PC people are in a class of their own, neither left or right.
Like the puritans some hundreds years earlier.
(Score: 2, Disagree) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:50PM (14 children)
I could *almost* accept that - except for the fact that every issue on which the PC people take a stand seems to be moderately left, at the least, more likely extreme left, and in some cases, batshit crazy left. Are you aware of any issues the PC crowd has taken a right leaning stand on?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:26PM (8 children)
How about all the War on Christmas folks? We just don't label it PC but it totally is.
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:43PM (7 children)
The war on Christmas is most definitely PC - but I don't see righties, or Republicans, or even conservatives jumping on that bandwagon. The most "conservative" people on that bandwagon seem to be atheists, and pagans. The left allies itself with atheists pretty often. The left seems willing to use pagans for their own ends, but they don't really seem like allies. Oh - Muslims might be offended by a "Merry Christmas". And, Muslims are very conservative - making most of America's right appear far-left. But, the left loves Islam because Islam hates America. Crazy shit, ain't it? Then, there are the Jews, most of whom are between conservative, and bat-shit-crazy right conservative. But, there aren't a whole lot of American Jews who care about the silly Christian traditions. The Jews are going to observe their own customs, just as they have always done, paying no mind to the world around them.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @06:19PM (1 child)
Maybe you should spend some time watching FOX News between Halloween and New Years. They just can't shut up about it.
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Wednesday March 28 2018, @06:51PM
Bah. Didn't see your post before I said basically the same thing. Sorry. Modded you up. :)
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Wednesday March 28 2018, @06:50PM (1 child)
Pagans wouldn't generally war on Christmas. After all, they invented it. The Christians just sort of dragged their crosses in and set up shop a day late and an orgy short. Which truly isn't all bad, because now I get neat presents under my solstice bush.
And atheists don't generally war on pagans. Some of us (me, for instance) even totally approve of those those orgies and the dancing and the naked women (I could do entirely without the naked men, but life is often challenging. One must take the wood with the glorious.)
So there you go.
OTOH, go watch right-wing, conservative FOX news around that time. There's where you'll find your "War on Christmas" being invented out of whole cloth.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 29 2018, @01:06AM
Bet yet a present of a solstice bush. Much less likely without the orgies.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday March 28 2018, @07:43PM (2 children)
There was a war on Christmas once. You know who was waging it? PURITANS. The people who today would be either too hardcore for the John Birch society or actually in jail for beating their kids to death. You don't know shit about history and boy does it show.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday March 29 2018, @01:39AM (1 child)
Nothing new there. None of the holidays that are celebrated by Christians today are biblical. The Jews are far more faithful to their history and tradition than Christians. Maybe you don't know shit about what I know?
Fact is, we are where we are today, and much of the non-Christian world resents whenever a Christian says "Merry Christmas". And, properly speaking, no shits should be given whenever a non-Christian takes offense.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday March 29 2018, @02:09AM
You do realize (of course you don't, I'm being rhetorical...) that the umbrage they take at that is a proxy for the more serious and more real problem of Christians trying to turn the US government into a theocracy? Yes, getting pissed when someone says "Merry Christmas" is a dumb-assed hill to die on, but it's a microcosm of the real problem here. I wish people would educate themselves, though.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @08:59PM
Not perfect examples, but some of these might refresh your memory:
Not "supporting the troops", speaking against the president, flag burning, not supporting the Iraq war (remember the Dixie Chicks), not standing during the National Anthem, Happy Holidays, not saying the Pledge of Allegiance, McCarthyism, Intelligent Design instead of creationism, Freedom Fries, banning books/media that feature non-heterosexuals, and other things that are considered unnatural/impure/un-American/anti-Christian.
(Score: 2, Disagree) by dry on Thursday March 29 2018, @06:01AM (3 children)
Freedom for the common person. You do understand that left means for the people and right means for the aristocracy, or now a days, the rich?
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday March 29 2018, @01:52PM (2 children)
You're serious, aren't you?
(Score: 2) by dry on Thursday March 29 2018, @03:26PM (1 child)
Look it up. The left-right split happened in the run up to the French revolution. Those who supported the King and church sat on the right and those who supported the people sat on the left.
The problem is things are more complicated then a simple split, people are just as divided in the authoritarian vs libertarian direction and then there are the corrupt who don't really care about left vs right excepting whichever way will enrich themselves. Unluckily it is generally the corrupt who win as they don't give a shit about anything except power. Almost by definition a successful politician needs to be corrupt, especially in America.
(Score: 3, Touché) by Runaway1956 on Thursday March 29 2018, @03:38PM
So - when the bastards are robbing us, we can tell whether they are lefties or righties, by observing which hand takes our money? Ok, that makes some kinda sense, I guess.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Wednesday March 28 2018, @06:24PM
They are one thing for sure: authoritarian.
(Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:32PM
OK now it's my turn: Why do politically correct lefties hate porn?
Do they, or are you begging the question?
The only indication there's any lefties involved with this is the word of a guy who likes to lie about who is involved with this.
(Score: 3, Funny) by Justin Case on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:23PM
C'mon, people, do I have to do all the work?
Why do authoritarian bootlickers hate porn?
Because the person swinging the whip was not wearing a police uniform.
(Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:30PM
That's why you should write a dead tree snail mail letter - don't email or phone - to advise them to blackhole google analytics with their hosts file
Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:33PM (2 children)
They don't. Per-capita, they use it more.
What they see here is an opportunity in all those $20 fees.
What I wish is that this were the other way around. If you want pr0n blocked, then pay a $20 fee to block it.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Wednesday March 28 2018, @07:02PM (1 child)
Yeah, but they consider man-getting-peed-on and female dominance videos "educational", or at any rate, "forgiven", so those will probably be excepted. :)
(Score: 3, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday March 28 2018, @07:44PM
Female dominance can be hot, if not taken too far. Doesn't matter which of the two women it is, either :)
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @06:17PM
Because it's one of the few industries where women are more powerful than men, and they just can't let that happen.
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday March 28 2018, @08:05PM
They love porn, and the dirtier the better. This guy will be just like all those anti-gay campaigners caught with a a rentboy, and be caught with some smut on his laptop.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 28 2018, @03:39PM (2 children)
You'll take my porn from my chafed, slippery hands!
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday March 28 2018, @04:28PM
"Very well."
- Chris Seviieirei
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday March 28 2018, @05:34PM
You can have my pr0n when you pry it from my warm sticky fingers!
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.