Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday June 23 2018, @05:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the be-vewwy-vewwy-quiet...-we're-hunting-weapons dept.

AI can detect signs of nuclear weapons testing banned under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, according to research from the US Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. A group of scientists have built a neural network to sniff out any unusual nuclear activity. Researchers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), one of the United States Department of Energy national laboratories, decided to see if they could use deep learning to sort through the different nuclear decay events to identify any suspicious behavior.

The lab, buried beneath 81 feet of concrete, rock and earth, is blocked out from energy from cosmic rays, electronics and other sources. It means that the data collected is less noisy, making it easier to pinpoint unusual activity.

The system looks for electrons emitted and scattered from radioactive particles decaying, and monitor the abundance of argon-37, a radioactive isotope of argon-39 that is created synthetically through nuclear explosions.

Argon-37 which has a half-life of 35 days, is emitted when calcium captures excess neutrons and decays by emitting an alpha particle. Emily Mace, a scientist at PNNL, said she looks for the energy, timing, duration and other features of the decay events to see if it's from nuclear testing.

"Some pulse shapes are difficult to interpret," said Mace. "It can be challenging to differentiate between good and bad data."

Deep learning makes that process easier. Computer scientists collected 32,000 pulses and annotated their properties, teaching the system to spot any odd features that might classify a signal as ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

"Signals can be well behaved or they can be poorly behaved," said Jesse Ward. "For the network to learn about the good signals, it needs a decent amount of bad signals for comparison." When the researchers tested their system with 50,000 pulses and asked human experts to differentiate signals, the neural network agreed with them 100 per cent of the time. It also correctly identified 99.9 per cent of the pulses compared to 96.1 per cent from more conventional techniques.

[...] The results were presented at the Methods and Applications of Radioanalytical Chemistry conference in Hawaii this year.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @09:43AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @09:43AM (#697162)

    this can be trendsetting, u don't have to manufacture expensive sensors, enough to write AI, it can detect things...

    cool...

    -zug

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @09:46AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @09:46AM (#697163)

      btw, the quality of a comment should reflect the quality of article...

      a better question is, what have signal processing people done up to now?
      used wrong methods?

      for "these" type of physical processes, you should not need NN, other, more conventional, methods should be fine...

      whatever...

      -zug

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @05:10PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 23 2018, @05:10PM (#697242)

    first it came for the nuclear testing and i said nothing because i wasn't north korea...

(1)