Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Friday August 03 2018, @09:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the invest-in-cable-ties dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The Federal Communications Commission today approved new rules that could let Google Fiber and other new Internet service providers gain faster access to utility poles.

The FCC's One Touch Make Ready (OTMR) rules will let companies attach wires to utility poles without waiting for the other users of the pole to move their own wires. Google Fiber says its deployment has stalled in multiple cities because Comcast and AT&T take a long time to get poles ready for new attachers. One Touch Make Ready rules let new attachers make all of the necessary wire adjustments themselves.

Comcast urged the FCC to "reject 'one-touch make-ready' proposals, which inure solely to the benefit of new entrants while unnecessarily risking harm to existing attachers and their customers."

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai rejected this argument, saying that startups are unnecessarily delayed when they have to wait for incumbent ISPs before hanging wires.

But the FCC changes won't solve the problem of slow deployment everywhere. FCC pole-attachment rules apply only to privately owned poles, as opposed to poles owned by municipalities and cooperatives. The FCC rules also don't apply in states that have opted out of the federal regime in order to use their own methods of regulating pole attachments. Twenty states and Washington, DC, have previously opted out of the federal pole-attachment rules, while pole attachments in the other 30 states are governed by FCC rules.

[...] Some local governments had already imposed their own One Touch Make Ready rules, with mixed success. Nashville's OTMR ordinance was thrown out by a court, handing a victory to AT&T and Comcast. But AT&T lost a similar court case against Louisville and Jefferson County in Kentucky.

AT&T said it supported OTMR at the FCC level but asked for limitations that would have slowed the process and made it more expensive, such as a requirement that new attachers pay for engineering analyses when "overlashing" wires. The FCC rejected that suggestion, saying that "utilities may not use advanced notice requirements to impose quasi-application or quasi-pre-approval requirements, such as requiring engineering studies."

Still, the FCC is adopting One Touch Make Ready only for "simple attachments." A shortened version of the old process will apply to attachments that are "complex," meaning they are likely to cause outages or damages. A shortened version of the old process will also apply on the upper parts of a pole, where high-voltage electrical equipment is kept.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

Related Stories

Google Fiber: A "Successful Failure"? 11 comments

Why Google Fiber Is High-Speed Internet's Most Successful Failure (archive)

In the Big Bang Disruption model, where innovations take off suddenly when markets are ready for them, Google Fiber could be seen as a failed early market experiment in gigabit internet access. But what if the company's goal was never to unleash the disrupter itself so much as to encourage incumbent broadband providers to do so, helping Google's expansion in adjacent markets such as video and emerging markets including smart homes? Seen through that lens, Google Fiber succeeded wildly. It stimulated the incumbents to accelerate their own infrastructure investments by several years. New applications and new industries emerged, including virtual reality and the Internet of Things, proving the viability of an "if you build it, they will come" strategy for gigabit services. And in the process, local governments were mobilized to rethink restrictive and inefficient approaches to overseeing network installations.

[...] Google went about announcing locations, and incumbent broadband ISPs, including AT&T, CenturyLink, Comcast, and Time Warner Cable, would quickly counter by promising improved pricing, faster speeds, network upgrades or some combination of the three. A "game of gigs" had erupted. In the end, Google announced plans to build in 34 cities, playing a kind of broadband whack-a-mole game. Incumbents, who initially dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt, accelerated and reprioritized their own deployments city by city as Google announced follow-on expansion.

As the game of gigs played out, city leaders were forced to offer the same administrative advantages to incumbents as they had to Google Fiber. Construction costs fell, and the speed of deployments increased. Only six years after Google's initial announcement, according to the Fiber Broadband Association, 30% of urban residents had access to gigabit Internet service.

Related: Movie Studios Fear a Piracy Surge From Google Fiber
Google Files Letter with FCC Showing Positives of Title II for Broadband Providers
Google Fiber Announces Next 4 Cities to Get 1Gbps
AT&T Charges $29 More for Gigabit Fiber that Doesn't Watch Your Web Browsing
Austinites Outraged as Google Fiber Tears Up Texas Capital
Google Fiber Buys Webpass ISP
After Years Waiting for Google Fiber, KC Residents Get Cancellation E-Mails
FCC Gives Google Fiber and New ISPs Faster Access to Utility Poles


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Gaaark on Friday August 03 2018, @09:52PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Friday August 03 2018, @09:52PM (#716990) Journal

    I want the government to fast track things for me, but i obviously don't have enough money or political power (collectively, i have only one vote plus what i can talk my wife, son and daughter into, if i can).

    Gotta get me more money, power or votes.

    Gonna go see me some Russians (shit! Did my hands just get smaller??? HILLLARY? HILLARY...COME SEE THIS (not my wife's real name))

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @09:59PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @09:59PM (#716991)

    I guess. I still remember days past, when we had real competition in our telecoms services. At first in phone service, after the AT&T breakup, then in internet service, because that (slowly) ran on the liberalized phone service.

    But because he is in Trump's government, are we going to see partisan finger pointing?

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by RandomFactor on Friday August 03 2018, @10:29PM (5 children)

      by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 03 2018, @10:29PM (#717002) Journal

      Forcing a new player to wait 6 weeks per request for a Comcast etc. to get around to taking care of it is simply a death sentence. Everyone knows that. This is absolutely the right call.

      We've all heard the stories of entrenched players screwing with the lines of newcomers. I feel for customers inconvenienced in the rare event something does happen, but that's all.

      They can feel free to set up a decent coordination method instead of whinging like giant spoiled brats and saying "please kill the competition for our convenience" all the damned time.

      --
      В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
      • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Friday August 03 2018, @10:42PM (2 children)

        by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Friday August 03 2018, @10:42PM (#717009) Homepage Journal

        The Green Site reported that whenever AT&T installs FiOS they cut the local loop off at the pole.

        That's just wrong: Local Loop POTS will still work in the event of a natural disaster or national emergency.

        --
        Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @10:57PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @10:57PM (#717014)

          Considering they're no longer battery backed I'd say they're about as useless as VOIP when the power goes down.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 05 2018, @12:34PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 05 2018, @12:34PM (#717494)

          This is what the NBN is doing in Australia even though in many places the copper is still good.
          The copper is rotting! We must get rid of it! Complete BS
          In other places they are putting copper in. For a fibre network. Go figure.

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @01:15AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @01:15AM (#717047)

        Presumably the companies that have those wires will still have the opportunity to handle their own wires, they just won't be able to delay the installation of a competitors wires by procrastinating on moving theirs.

        I can only assume that Comcast didn't offer a sufficient bribe to Ajit Pie in order to mess this decision up.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Spamalope on Saturday August 04 2018, @05:01PM

        by Spamalope (5233) on Saturday August 04 2018, @05:01PM (#717249) Homepage

        Here in Texas when we had local loop competition for a few years (ILECs - independant lecs - SWBell agreed to allow it in exchange for being able to offer long distance again) the SWBell techs would damage the lines our 3rd party service used, switch us over to known bad pairs and rotate us between known bad pairs if we made a service call. Every. Single. Time. I had to make them show me the levels on the test gear... and suddenly they found they had to fix 'one more thing' as they were busted. (I had a list of all the bad pairs by this time - they'd move our data line to one of the same bad pairs most times they were in the building doing a voice install - nice Huh?) Our SDSL service was 1/10th the cost of SWBells offering. (i.e. similar pricing to other countries vs the Bell monopoly pricing)

        SWBell had a solution though. The vast majority of problems were happening with ILEC circuits, so they lobbied the state to end the program to stop all these problems. Why, just euthanize our victim and our abuse will end!

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @01:45AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @01:45AM (#717068)

      But because he is in Trump's government, are we going to see partisan finger pointing?

      When don't we?

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bob_super on Friday August 03 2018, @10:08PM (7 children)

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday August 03 2018, @10:08PM (#716993)

    Hey ! How about giving faster access to conduits ?
    It would be wonderful if the place didn't look like a third world country, with overloaded poles sensitive to wind, snow, and all kinds of critters.

    There are many places in the US served by underground facilities, so it looks like it's not an unknown dark art. Where is Trump's fabled Infrastructure Plan, and does it include mandatory conduit under every road repair yet ?

  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Friday August 03 2018, @10:34PM (2 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Friday August 03 2018, @10:34PM (#717005) Homepage Journal

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @02:18PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 04 2018, @02:18PM (#717214)

    Strange, the federal government seeing thru established business tactics to drag things out and delay.

    That is rare.

  • (Score: 1) by ankh on Saturday August 04 2018, @04:53PM

    by ankh (754) on Saturday August 04 2018, @04:53PM (#717248) Homepage

    Dane, owner of Sonic.net, commented when I reposted this FCC story there:

    =======
    "... unfortunately the new Federal standards only apply in 30 states. California and 19 others elected to engage in reverse preemption. The access to poles here is governed by the CPUC's 1998 Right of Way (RoW) decision. Under that framework we've had better conditions than the Federal standards, and we do have an effective one-touch make-ready process today. But there are a number of improvements where the new Federal standards have overtaken California's regulatory framework, and we'll be working on our advocacy with the CPUC to encourage updates to the RoW standards here as a result."
    =======

    Sonic is building out fiber all over our part of California.

(1)